Re: Comet, next steps

2006-06-16 Thread Remy Maucherat
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: Unfortunately, it looks like it: +for (int i=0; i+//this resets the remaining flag and the content length on the filter +//if we don't do this, then request.getInputStream.read will return 0 +

Re: Comet, next steps

2006-06-16 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
Remy Maucherat wrote: Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: Actually, I think the server should be the one closing the connection. In other cases, since it's a long running request, discarding the connection is easier. In HTTP land, the server is always the one in control of keepalive. That's correct

Re: Comet, next steps

2006-06-16 Thread Remy Maucherat
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: Actually, I think the server should be the one closing the connection. In other cases, since it's a long running request, discarding the connection is easier. In HTTP land, the server is always the one in control of keepalive. That's correct, however, the current

Re: Comet, next steps

2006-06-16 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
Remy Maucherat wrote: Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: Gents, I have played around with the Comet implementation, fixed a few bugs and got the initial it working, including async data from both client and server. I wanted to you get your input on moving forward with the follow

Re: Comet, next steps

2006-06-16 Thread Remy Maucherat
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: Gents, I have played around with the Comet implementation, fixed a few bugs and got the initial it working, including async data from both client and server. I wanted to you get your input on moving forward with the following features: 1. If CometServlet.read

Comet, next steps

2006-06-16 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
Gents, I have played around with the Comet implementation, fixed a few bugs and got the initial it working, including async data from both client and server. I wanted to you get your input on moving forward with the following features: 1. If CometServlet.read return false, the adapter should