On 09/13/2010 11:51 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> I just spotted that in a couple of places 6.0.29 reports itself as
> 6.0.0.29. Looking at the tag, it appears
>
> version.patch=29
>
> was used rather than
>
> version.build=29
>
> It isn't a major issue as in most places the version property is used
I just spotted that in a couple of places 6.0.29 reports itself as
6.0.0.29. Looking at the tag, it appears
version.patch=29
was used rather than
version.build=29
It isn't a major issue as in most places the version property is used
(which is set to 6.0.29).
Just something to keep in mind when
