On Sep 2, 2008, at 2:37 PM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/tomcat/tomcat-5.5/v5.5.27/
According to the release process, the 5.5.27 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[X] Stable
-
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/tomcat/tomcat-5.5/v5.5.27/
According to the release process, the 5.5.27 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[X] Stable
Even considering the discussion about the startup problems when t
Rainer Jung wrote:
George Sexton schrieb:
I will try a wild-card permission and see what happens.
Thank you. One caveat: I tried to end it the path with
"${file.separator}-", but that doesn't work. When using the trailing "-"
syntax, you really have to use a real file separator, not the vari
George Sexton schrieb:
> I will try a wild-card permission and see what happens.
Thank you. One caveat: I tried to end it the path with
"${file.separator}-", but that doesn't work. When using the trailing "-"
syntax, you really have to use a real file separator, not the variable :(
> Rainer Jung
I will try a wild-card permission and see what happens.
Rainer Jung wrote:
George Sexton schrieb:
Rainer Jung wrote:
I have 250+ virtual hosts per tomcat instance. It seems like a lot of
overhead that I'm not interested in.
How would I add the correct configuration to catalina.policy for 250
v
George Sexton schrieb:
> Rainer Jung wrote:
> I have 250+ virtual hosts per tomcat instance. It seems like a lot of
> overhead that I'm not interested in.
>
> How would I add the correct configuration to catalina.policy for 250
> virtual hosts/contexts into catalina.policy?
>
> It seems to me tha
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 1:58 PM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I wont stop this release, there are way too many important fixes.
> the only way this release wont happen, is if we don't get 3+ stable votes,
> then we do another release
You don't need 3 stable votes. You need
Rainer Jung wrote:
As far as I understand the issue, the solution is to use the correct
security manager profile. In catalina.policy there is already a comment
how to do that (search for "per context logging").
Just to be perfectly clear. This bug means that tomcat will not work in
securi
I wont stop this release, there are way too many important fixes.
the only way this release wont happen, is if we don't get 3+ stable votes,
then we do another release
Filip
George Sexton wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
George Sexton wrote:
I guess I'm not understanding how you use the
Rainer Jung wrote:
As far as I understand the issue, the solution is to use the correct
security manager profile. In catalina.policy there is already a comment
how to do that (search for "per context logging").
I'm not doing per context logging and I don't want to. That's what I
find terrib
George Sexton wrote:
For me this is a critical error. Tomcat 5.5.26 and 5.5.27 don't work
when run under the security manager.
It's really not a trivial corner case. Did you look at my stack trace
from Saturday? Trying to open a socket in one part of my code triggered
the bug. The class loade
On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 2:37 PM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The candidates binaries are available here:
> http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/tomcat/tomcat-5.5/v5.5.27/
>
> According to the release process, the 5.5.27 tag is:
> [ ] Broken
> [ ] Alpha
> [ X ] Beta
> [ ] Stable
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
George Sexton wrote:
I guess I'm not understanding how you use the term regression. 5.5.25
for sure did not have this problem.
5.5.26 introduced it, and 5.5.27 has it.
How do you mean regression?
x.y.-1 was free of it and x.y.-0 demonstrated it.
This is x.y.
George Sexton wrote:
I guess I'm not understanding how you use the term regression. 5.5.25
for sure did not have this problem.
5.5.26 introduced it, and 5.5.27 has it.
How do you mean regression?
x.y.-1 was free of it and x.y.-0 demonstrated it.
This is x.y.-2 is free of it, x.y.-1 demons
David Rees wrote:
On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 12:01 PM, George Sexton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
To have a build that breaks an application because the container is
violating security policy looking for a non-existent file is just not
acceptable.
In order for me to use this build I would have to i
On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 12:01 PM, George Sexton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To have a build that breaks an application because the container is
> violating security policy looking for a non-existent file is just not
> acceptable.
>
> In order for me to use this build I would have to install the pat
Filip,
I know I don't count, but since the build is broken when running the
security manager I would have to say
> [x] Broken
To have a build that breaks an application because the container is
violating security policy looking for a non-existent file is just not
acceptable.
In order for
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/tomcat/tomcat-5.5/v5.5.27/
According to the release process, the 5.5.27 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] Stable
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [
18 matches
Mail list logo
