Re: [VOTE] Release build 4.1.39

2008-12-02 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
According to the release process, the 4.1.39 tag is: [ ] Broken [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta [X] Stable - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE] Release build 4.1.39

2008-12-02 Thread Mark Thomas
Rainer Jung wrote: > Mark Thomas schrieb: >> According to the release process, the 4.1.39 tag is: >> [ ] Broken >> [ ] Alpha >> [ ] Beta >> [X] Stable Any more votes for 4.1.39? We still need another +1 to do the release. Mark ---

Re: [VOTE] Release build 4.1.39

2008-11-27 Thread Rainer Jung
Mark Thomas schrieb: > According to the release process, the 4.1.39 tag is: > [ ] Broken > [ ] Alpha > [ ] Beta > [X] Stable Regards, Rainer - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PRO

Re: [VOTE] Release build 4.1.39

2008-11-25 Thread Mark Thomas
Mark Thomas wrote: > The source tarball and other packages are available here: > http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/apache-tomcat-4.1.39/ > > According to the release process, the 4.1.39 tag is: > [ ] Broken > [ ] Alpha > [ ] Beta > [X] Stable Mark --

Re: [VOTE] Release build 4.1.39

2008-11-21 Thread Rainer Jung
Mark Thomas schrieb: > sebb wrote: >> On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> sebb wrote: >>> > I meant where to find the tag directory for the release 4.1.39. >>> >>> >>> It is in your inbox. Look at the svn commit messages. >> Which all seem to be against trunk, i.e. not a tag.

Re: [VOTE] Release build 4.1.39

2008-11-19 Thread Mark Thomas
sebb wrote: > On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> sebb wrote: >> > On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> sebb wrote: >> >> > On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> sebb wrote: >> >> >> > On 19/11/2008, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: [VOTE] Release build 4.1.39

2008-11-19 Thread sebb
On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > sebb wrote: > > On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> sebb wrote: > >> > On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> sebb wrote: > >> >> > On 19/11/2008, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >>

Re: [VOTE] Release build 4.1.39

2008-11-19 Thread Mark Thomas
sebb wrote: > On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> sebb wrote: >> > On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> sebb wrote: >> >> > On 19/11/2008, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> >>

Re: [VOTE] Release build 4.1.39

2008-11-19 Thread sebb
On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > sebb wrote: > > On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> sebb wrote: > >> > On 19/11/2008, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> > >> >>> The source ta

Re: [VOTE] Release build 4.1.39

2008-11-19 Thread Mark Thomas
sebb wrote: > On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> sebb wrote: >> > On 19/11/2008, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> >>> The source tarball and other packages are available here: >> >> > http://tomcat.apac

Re: [VOTE] Release build 4.1.39

2008-11-19 Thread sebb
On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > sebb wrote: > > However, there are several binary files that are different: > > > > connectors/jni/native/os/win32/logmessages.bin > > connectors/procrun/bin.../tomcat*.exe > > > > This suggests a packaging error - perhaps these bin file

Re: [VOTE] Release build 4.1.39

2008-11-19 Thread sebb
On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > sebb wrote: > > On 19/11/2008, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >>> The source tarball and other packages are available here: > >> > http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/apac

Re: [VOTE] Release build 4.1.39

2008-11-19 Thread Mark Thomas
sebb wrote: > However, there are several binary files that are different: > > connectors/jni/native/os/win32/logmessages.bin > connectors/procrun/bin.../tomcat*.exe > > This suggests a packaging error - perhaps these bin files were > incorrectly formatted to correct the line-endings? Looks like.

Re: [VOTE] Release build 4.1.39

2008-11-19 Thread Mark Thomas
sebb wrote: > On 19/11/2008, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> The source tarball and other packages are available here: >> > http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/apache-tomcat-4.1.39/ >> > > I just ran RAT on the source archive. > > Th

Re: [VOTE] Release build 4.1.39

2008-11-19 Thread sebb
On 19/11/2008, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > The source tarball and other packages are available here: > > http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/apache-tomcat-4.1.39/ > I just ran RAT on the source archive. There are a lot of source fi

Re: [VOTE] Release build 4.1.39

2008-11-19 Thread sebb
On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The source tarball and other packages are available here: > http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/apache-tomcat-4.1.39/ Hashes and sigs all work OK now. However there are some problems with the archives. == There are two copies of the source,

Re: [VOTE] Release build 4.1.39

2008-11-19 Thread sebb
On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > sebb wrote: > > On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> I had network troubles during the upload and I had to retry several times. > >> I thought it completed without error but it looks like > >> apache-tomcat-4.1.39-

Re: [VOTE] Release build 4.1.39

2008-11-19 Thread sebb
On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > sebb wrote: > > Sorry, just discovered the problem. > > > > The key id is not 33C60243 (as reported by GPGV); it is 0x33C60243. > > I'll know next time... > > > Yep - that'll be the problem. When you search for key IDs you always have > t

Re: [VOTE] Release build 4.1.39

2008-11-19 Thread Mark Thomas
sebb wrote: > Sorry, just discovered the problem. > > The key id is not 33C60243 (as reported by GPGV); it is 0x33C60243. > I'll know next time... Yep - that'll be the problem. When you search for key IDs you always have to use hexadecimal format and prefix the id with "0x" (note zero, not the le

Re: [VOTE] Release build 4.1.39

2008-11-19 Thread Mark Thomas
sebb wrote: > On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I had network troubles during the upload and I had to retry several times. >> I thought it completed without error but it looks like >> apache-tomcat-4.1.39-LE-jdk14.exe got corrupted during the upload. The MD5 >> and sig is

Re: [VOTE] Release build 4.1.39

2008-11-19 Thread sebb
On 19/11/2008, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > sebb wrote: > > > On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> The source tarball and other packages are available here: > > >> http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/apache

Re: [VOTE] Release build 4.1.39

2008-11-19 Thread sebb
On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > sebb wrote: > > On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> The source tarball and other packages are available here: > >> http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/apache-tomcat-4.1.39/ > >> > >> According to the release process

Re: [VOTE] Release build 4.1.39

2008-11-19 Thread Mark Thomas
sebb wrote: > On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> The source tarball and other packages are available here: >> http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/apache-tomcat-4.1.39/ >> >> According to the release process, the 4.1.39 tag is: >> [X] Broken > > The sigs and hashes don't agre

Re: [VOTE] Release build 4.1.39

2008-11-19 Thread sebb
On 19/11/2008, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The source tarball and other packages are available here: > > http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/apache-tomcat-4.1.39/ > > > > According to the release process, the 4.1.39 tag is: > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release build 4.1.39

2008-11-19 Thread sebb
On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The source tarball and other packages are available here: > http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/apache-tomcat-4.1.39/ > > According to the release process, the 4.1.39 tag is: > [X] Broken The sigs and hashes don't agree with their targets, e

[VOTE] Release build 4.1.39

2008-11-19 Thread Mark Thomas
The source tarball and other packages are available here: http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/apache-tomcat-4.1.39/ According to the release process, the 4.1.39 tag is: [ ] Broken [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta [ ] Stable Cheers, Mark - To