Re: [PROPOSAL] Remove o.a.catlina.InstanceListener

2011-01-07 Thread Remy Maucherat
On Fri, 2011-01-07 at 15:18 +0300, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: > We indeed do not have our own classes that implement InstanceListener, > but if you search for o.a.c.InstanceEvent, it is used in a plenty of places > (to implement this feature actually). > > So it is not just throwing away classes, i

Re: [PROPOSAL] Remove o.a.catlina.InstanceListener

2011-01-07 Thread Mark Thomas
On 07/01/2011 12:18, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: > 2011/1/7 Mark Thomas : >> All, >> >> I just stumbled across o.a.catlina.InstanceListener and the associated >> classes when I was reviewing the results of the unused code detector. >> >> It isn't used at all in 7.0.x, nor can I find any sign of it be

Re: [PROPOSAL] Remove o.a.catlina.InstanceListener

2011-01-07 Thread Konstantin Kolinko
2011/1/7 Mark Thomas : > All, > > I just stumbled across o.a.catlina.InstanceListener and the associated > classes when I was reviewing the results of the unused code detector. > > It isn't used at all in 7.0.x, nor can I find any sign of it being used > in 6.0.x and 5.5.x. A search of the mail arc

[PROPOSAL] Remove o.a.catlina.InstanceListener

2011-01-07 Thread Mark Thomas
All, I just stumbled across o.a.catlina.InstanceListener and the associated classes when I was reviewing the results of the unused code detector. It isn't used at all in 7.0.x, nor can I find any sign of it being used in 6.0.x and 5.5.x. A search of the mail archives doesn't turn up any uses eith