On 06/06/2019 20:06, bugzi...@apache.org wrote:
> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59750
>
> --- Comment #14 from jerry ---
I've disabled this idiot's account.
I'll delete the comment from the database shortly.
Mark
---
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59750
--- Comment #14 from jerry ---
Technical side of the main subject. For example Tomcat F14 Fighter Jet.
The specification of a Tomcat will be a good reference.
The complication of the machine and material.
Will come in handle for us to digest i
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59750
--- Comment #13 from Christopher Schultz ---
(In reply to Mark Thomas from comment #11)
> JASPIC exposes both the request and the response. The solution to this one
> could just be "Use JASPIC".
Sounds great. Now how does one "use JASPIC" to u
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59750
--- Comment #12 from Christopher Schultz ---
(In reply to Christopher Schultz from comment #9)
> Justification for Realm over Authenticator:
Justification for not using Realm:
1. No access to HttpServletRequest (for e.g. IP logging)
:(
--
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59750
--- Comment #11 from Mark Thomas ---
JASPIC exposes both the request and the response. The solution to this one
could just be "Use JASPIC".
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59750
--- Comment #10 from Remy Maucherat ---
I agree you could experiment with a combined realm (lockout realm is an example
of that indeed), it would need to call your listener in authenticate and
invoke.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Y
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59750
--- Comment #9 from Christopher Schultz ---
(In reply to Christopher Schultz from comment #8)
> Two additional thoughts:
>
> 1. Could this be implemented as a Realm which can wrap another realm? This
> may simplify things when a user wants to
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59750
--- Comment #8 from Christopher Schultz ---
Two additional thoughts:
1. Could this be implemented as a Realm which can wrap another realm? This may
simplify things when a user wants to authenticate using one-of-many concrete
realm implementati
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59750
--- Comment #7 from Michael Osipov <1983-01...@gmx.net> ---
(In reply to Christopher Schultz from comment #6)
> (In reply to Michael Osipov from comment #5)
> > GSSName or X509Certificate and like. I always prefer passing Object and the
> > impl
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59750
--- Comment #6 from Christopher Schultz ---
(In reply to Michael Osipov from comment #5)
> GSSName or X509Certificate and like. I always prefer passing Object and the
> implementation decides about the cast.
Seems reasonable.
Tomcat only supp
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59750
--- Comment #5 from Michael Osipov <1983-01...@gmx.net> ---
(In reply to Christopher Schultz from comment #4)
> (In reply to Michael Osipov from comment #3)
> > (In reply to Christopher Schultz from comment #2)
> > > Created attachment 35824 [de
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59750
--- Comment #4 from Christopher Schultz ---
(In reply to Michael Osipov from comment #3)
> (In reply to Christopher Schultz from comment #2)
> > Created attachment 35824 [details]
> > Draft patch to give an idea of the proposal
> >
> > See thi
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59750
--- Comment #3 from Michael Osipov <1983-01...@gmx.net> ---
(In reply to Christopher Schultz from comment #2)
> Created attachment 35824 [details]
> Draft patch to give an idea of the proposal
>
> See this draft patch for something that might w
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59750
--- Comment #2 from Christopher Schultz ---
Created attachment 35824
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35824&action=edit
Draft patch to give an idea of the proposal
See this draft patch for something that might work. At le
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59750
--- Comment #1 from Christopher Schultz ---
What about a listener for authentication events?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To un
15 matches
Mail list logo
