https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59750
--- Comment #5 from Michael Osipov <1983-01...@gmx.net> --- (In reply to Christopher Schultz from comment #4) > (In reply to Michael Osipov from comment #3) > > (In reply to Christopher Schultz from comment #2) > > > Created attachment 35824 [details] > > > Draft patch to give an idea of the proposal > > > > > > See this draft patch for something that might work. At least, it will meet > > > *my* needs. There is no provision for registering these listeners. It's > > > just > > > an example of how this kind of thing could work with FormAuthenticator as > > > the guinea pig class. > > > > > > Comments welcome. > > > > This applies to FormAuthenticator only? The API isn't generic enough. Don't > > assume the username to be a string only. > > This was a proof of concept, to get feedback. Can you suggest a username > that cannot be represented as a string? GSSName or X509Certificate and like. I always prefer passing Object and the implementation decides about the cast. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
