https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57708
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57708
--- Comment #7 from Graham Leggett ---
Thanks for this.
We backported all the way back to v7.0.x, as we're forced to use that by
support contracts on various software, such as Jira and Confluence.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57708
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Product|Tomcat 8|Tomcat 7
Component|Catalina
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57708
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Product|Tomcat 9|Tomcat 8
Version|unspecified
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57708
--- Comment #4 from Mark Thomas ---
I did look at this yesterday and I got as far as having something ready to
commit but I'm not entirely happy with.
The question is where to do the authorization.
If authorization is done in the CoyoteAdapto
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57708
--- Comment #3 from Mark Thomas ---
I've taken a quick look at the patch for 9.0.x. I suspect that my comments will
apply equally to the back-ports.
Overall, +1. I'd change some of the details (see below) but the general
approach looks sound.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57708
Graham Leggett changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||PatchAvailable
--
You are receiving
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57708
--- Comment #2 from Graham Leggett ---
Created attachment 32569
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32569&action=edit
Patch for tomcat v9.0.x
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
--
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57708
--- Comment #1 from Graham Leggett ---
Created attachment 32568
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32568&action=edit
Patch for tomcat v8.0.x
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
--
