https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54503
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54503
--- Comment #4 from Toby Hobson ---
(In reply to Mark Thomas from comment #3)
> That is a big patch.
>
> I have one immediate concern with the proposed patch with is the unknown
> licensing of the new JAR file.
>
> Looking more broadly, I
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54503
--- Comment #3 from Mark Thomas ---
That is a big patch.
I have one immediate concern with the proposed patch with is the unknown
licensing of the new JAR file.
Looking more broadly, I think it would be worth (re-)considering adding JASPI
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54503
--- Comment #2 from Toby Hobson ---
Hi Christopher
"Cloudseal" is certainly not a requirement, SAML2 would indeed be a better
name. I think the term is a hangover from our current implementation of the
authenticator which we offer with our
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54503
--- Comment #1 from Christopher Schultz ---
I'm floored: a great idea, backed-up with a complete set of diffs including
test cases and examples. I'm looking forward to diving-into the code further
when I get some time.
I did have two initi
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54503
Christopher Schultz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #29906|0 |1
is patch|
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54503
Toby Hobson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||toby.hob...@cloudseal.com
