[Bug 52381] Please add OSGi metadata

2018-05-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52381 Mark Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug 52381] Please add OSGi metadata

2018-05-25 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52381 --- Comment #17 from Mark Thomas --- I'm making some progress integrating bnd into the trunk build via the Ant plug-in. I've got it to the point where JARs with OSGI manifests are created. The next steps are: a) add property files for each JAR

[Bug 52381] Please add OSGi metadata

2018-05-25 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52381 --- Comment #16 from Mark Thomas --- I have a few comments but keep in mind my minimal OSGI knowledge: - I see placeholders %bundleProvider, %bundleName etc. nut nothing to populate them - The execution environments look wrong given the java

[Bug 52381] Please add OSGi metadata

2018-01-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52381 --- Comment #15 from Coty Sutherland --- Any thoughts on the patch? It's a rough draft and I should replace all the hard coded spec version info with dynamic stuff, but as far as using these manifests as a template to fill in other info, does t

[Bug 52381] Please add OSGi metadata

2017-12-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52381 --- Comment #14 from Violeta Georgieva --- (In reply to Coty Sutherland from comment #13) > Created attachment 35625 [details] > Attempt to add OSGi metadata > > Back on 2011-09-06 Roland Grunberg added the OSGi manifests that are used in > th

[Bug 52381] Please add OSGi metadata

2017-12-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52381 Coty Sutherland changed: What|Removed |Added CC||csuth...@redhat.com --- Comment #13

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 52381] Please add OSGi metadata

2012-03-22 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52381 --- Comment #12 from pan4o 2012-03-22 13:18:20 UTC --- All dependencies (imports) you need in a project, should be in Import-Package: All packages you want to expose (make them public), should be in Export-Package: In the OSGI way you can

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 52381] Please add OSGi metadata

2012-03-22 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52381 --- Comment #11 from Mark Thomas 2012-03-22 12:54:10 UTC --- The POM is no use since Tomcat is not built with Maven. What is required is details of what needs to go into the manifests. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzi

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 52381] Please add OSGi metadata

2012-03-22 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52381 --- Comment #10 from pan4o 2012-03-22 12:51:21 UTC --- if you need a more detailed POM ... i will submit a complete one :) -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mai

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 52381] Please add OSGi metadata

2012-03-20 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52381 --- Comment #9 from pan4o 2012-03-21 06:18:23 UTC --- Very important for each bundle are the imports and exports sections in the MANIFEST file. We do this so: org.apache.felix maven-bundle-plugin 2.3.4 true

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 52381] Please add OSGi metadata

2012-03-20 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52381 --- Comment #8 from Mark Thomas 2012-03-20 22:36:51 UTC --- As far as I am aware, there is very little OSGI expertise amongst the Tomcat devs. What is really required for this enhancement is either: - a patch that generates the necessary me

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 52381] Please add OSGi metadata

2012-02-17 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52381 --- Comment #7 from Alexander Kurtakov 2012-02-17 11:21:59 UTC --- In order to avoid cyclic dependencies and yes servlet.jar is used in too many places so having dependencies to build its osgi metadata will be a big PITA I think that the s

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 52381] Please add OSGi metadata

2012-02-17 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52381 --- Comment #6 from Glyn Normington 2012-02-17 11:17:56 UTC --- If OSGi metadata is added, I suggest also adding a basic test to Tomcat's build to check that the Tomcat bundle resolve. (I created a similar test for Spring and I recommend t

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 52381] Please add OSGi metadata

2012-01-12 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52381 violet...@apache.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||violet...@apache.org -- Con

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 52381] Please add OSGi metadata

2012-01-12 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52381 --- Comment #5 from violet...@apache.org 2012-01-12 21:49:43 UTC --- Hello, In Eclipse Virgo we add OSGi metadata using Bundlor. The process is pretty straightforward and we have projects that do that stuff. Unfortunately we do not add OSGi

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 52381] Please add OSGi metadata

2012-01-05 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52381 --- Comment #4 from pan4o 2012-01-05 12:45:51 UTC --- This is a very important issue for us too, because of our Apache Karaf environment. See bugs 52318 and 52429 -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 52381] Please add OSGi metadata

2012-01-05 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52381 pan4o changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ssku4...@web.de -- Configure bugmail: htt

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 52381] Please add OSGi metadata

2011-12-29 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52381 Mark Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement --- Comment #3 from Mark

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 52381] Please add OSGi metadata

2011-12-23 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52381 --- Comment #2 from Mark Thomas 2011-12-23 21:27:07 UTC --- Not knowing much about OSGI, if you could provide suitable manifests that would be great. Once we have them, plugging them into the build is relatively simple. -- Configure bugma

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 52381] Please add OSGi metadata

2011-12-22 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52381 --- Comment #1 from Alexander Kurtakov 2011-12-22 12:40:36 UTC --- The manifests used aren't good enough for inclusion but I'll try to come with something better after vacation. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/us