https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49176
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49176
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|INVALID
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49176
--- Comment #3 from Scott Hamilton 2010-04-23
14:03:18 EDT ---
I don't mean to belabor the point, but I also noticed that the usage of this
data for runtime exceptions is not quite consistent. It will only be used and
show up in error mes
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49176
--- Comment #2 from Scott Hamilton 2010-04-23
13:14:01 EDT ---
That's a good point - indeed I missed that in looking thru the code.
I wonder, though, if there's any optimization that could be done here to reduce
the memory footprint of th
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49176
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
