Modeler...?

2006-05-31 Thread robert burrell donkin
as of you are probably aware, there's been talk ( http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/jakarta-general/200605.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]) on jakarta general about modeller and tomcat. opinions? anything i can do to help? - robert

Re: problem using apache's commons-fileupload-1.1 package

2006-05-01 Thread robert burrell donkin
tomcat-dev is for discussions about the development of Apache Tomcat. questions about using Tomcat should be addressed to the user list. however, this question is actually about commons-fileupload. It should have been posted to the commons-user list. please read http://jakarta.apache.org/site/mai

Re: Requesting volunteers to regression test commons-logging release candidate

2006-03-24 Thread robert burrell donkin
On 3/24/06, Costin Manolache <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > An alternative is to use the 'no discovery, no plugins, no layers' > implementation of commons-logging > that we have in sandbox :-) - which just implements the commons-logging > APIs > hardcoding everything to java.util.logging. People wh

Re: Requesting volunteers to regression test commons-logging release candidate

2006-03-23 Thread robert burrell donkin
On 3/23/06, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Remy Maucherat wrote: > > Ok, I tested it by replacing my existing commons-logging-api in the bin > > folder, and it doesn't behave as it was before. For some reason, it > > doesn't seem to be using java.util.logging by default anymore (I have

Re: Requesting volunteers to regression test commons-logging release candidate

2006-03-23 Thread robert burrell donkin
On 3/23/06, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > robert burrell donkin wrote: > > hello one and all > > > > JCL 1.1 is now very close to being released. we've done a lot of > > testing and spent a long time analysing the code base. we think we'v

Requesting volunteers to regression test commons-logging release candidate

2006-03-21 Thread robert burrell donkin
hello one and all JCL 1.1 is now very close to being released. we've done a lot of testing and spent a long time analysing the code base. we think we've solved as many of the issues with the 1.0.x series of releases which can be without breaking compatibility. we're now approaching some major dow