On 3/23/06, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > robert burrell donkin wrote: > > hello one and all > > > > JCL 1.1 is now very close to being released. we've done a lot of > > testing and spent a long time analysing the code base. we think we've > > solved as many of the issues with the 1.0.x series of releases which > > can be without breaking compatibility. > > > > we're now approaching some major downstream projects which have used > > the 1.0.x series releases to see if anyone would be willing to run > > regression tests to make sure we haven't introduced any problems with > > this release. if no issues emerge then it's expected that this release > > candidate will be the final one. > > > > IIRC remy had plans for a next generation replacement (cool by me BTW, > > we're just trying to fix as many problems as possible for existing > > users) but i'm not really sure how advanced these plans are. > > I'd be interested to know what were those cool NG plans :D
in that case, it's probably one of those rumours things :) for some reason using java.util logging and supporting log4j through a java.util logging provider (i believe boris unckel has one of these beasts more or less working now) springs into my mind but that's probably my well known overactive imagination at work... - robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
