On May 1, 2010, at 7:25 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>
> Thanks for the review. My bad. I saw we are using EPL for the JDT
> compiler and assumed we'd be fine for this to. I'll see what I can do to
> work around it or get the license changed.
No problem. The issue seems to have originated in BCEL...
On Apr 14, 2010, at 5:41 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 14/04/2010 21:31, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 14/04/2010 21:06, sebb wrote:
>>> 2 files in BCEL have IBM headers; these headers are presumably OK, but
>>> the NOTICE file probably needs to mention IBM. Not sure why the BCEL
>>> source archive does
Apologies for the broadcast message...
In thinking about ApacheCon 2010, I began to wonder if there is interest in
creating an "Enterprise Java" track for the conference. I think there is the
potential for a lot of interesting content. Many of our projects are busy
implementing JSR specs for Ja
On Mar 1, 2010, at 2:11 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
> Thanks for the answer Mark :)
>
> I have started to fork the Tomcat to implement a Java EE Web Profile, called
> Web Enterprise Server :)
>
> My reasons:
> 1* Without touching source code it is impossible to implement such a
> product.
> 2*
FYI,
Recently, while verifying a Geronimo release, I noticed that your jar
files do not contain Apache LICENSE or NOTICE files.
--kevan
On Feb 13, 2007, at 9:42 AM, Remy Maucherat wrote:
Hi,
New candidate binaries are available for testing:
http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.10/
On Dec 6, 2006, at 8:29 PM, Jeanfrancois Arcand wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Kevan Miller wrote:
Well, that's certainly the way it to be, IMO. However,
the xsd's (e.g. http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc6.0.x/
trunk/java/javax/servlet/resources/j2ee_1_4.xsd) are copyri
On Dec 6, 2006, at 4:23 PM, Remy Maucherat wrote:
Yoav Shapira wrote:
Hi,
I believe they're covered by Sun's intellectual property grant for
the
ASF made when they donated the initial version of Tomcat years ago.
The grant paperwork should be available electronically in the
Foundation repos
On Dec 6, 2006, at 3:24 PM, Yoav Shapira wrote:
Hi,
Ah yes: if you've got access to the Foundation svn repository (ASF
Members have access), you can check out Correspondence/Sun for the
Memorandum of Understanding from 1999 that covers this I think (IANAL
of course). It's makes for fun histori
I see that Tomcat binary distributions (and source tree) contains Sun
j2ee xsd's and dtd's (an ASL v2 license has even been applied to them).
Since the files are Copyrighted by Sun and state:
No part of this document may be reproduced in any form by any
means without prior written authori
Responses inline...
On Dec 24, 2005, at 4:10 AM, Remy Maucherat wrote:
Kevan Miller wrote:
Bill, Bill, and Remy -- thanks for your help. I've raised bug
38030 --
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38030
- I don't read bugzilla
Certainly your prerogative. I don&
Bill, Bill, and Remy -- thanks for your help. I've raised bug 38030 --
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38030
FYI, I tested TC behavior with an HTTP 1.1 POST without a message body and
no content-length. It worked, properly. However, I noticed an 8 second delay
between request and
On Dec 22, 2005, at 4:52 AM, Remy Maucherat wrote:
Bill Barker wrote:
AFAICT, this code is assuming that there will always be a
message body in the POST Request. However, this is not
necessarily the case (and is certainly not true for the problem
at hand). Eventually, SocketInputStream.
The Geronimo project has encountered a TCK issue running with Tomcat
5.5.12. We'd appreciate your help with the problem.
In the test, a POST Request without a message body is being received
and a 403 "The request body was too large to be cached during the
authentication process" is being im
13 matches
Mail list logo
