Responses inline...
On Dec 24, 2005, at 4:10 AM, Remy Maucherat wrote:
Kevan Miller wrote:
Bill, Bill, and Remy -- thanks for your help. I've raised bug
38030 --
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38030
- I don't read bugzilla
Certainly your prerogative. I don't care for bugzilla, either...
- it is not a bug (the request is invalid)
So please close your report.
As I have acknowledged, the validity of the POST Request is
debatable. However, there is only a "memo" on which you are basing
your classification. Tomcat's behavior should be governed by the RFC
2616 specification. Tomcat's response is not compliant with RFC 2616
and you have offered no reasons why Tomcat should not be compliant
with the specification. I've also demonstrated that Tomcat's behavior
for bodiless HTTP 1.1 POST Requests is terrible (Tomcat will still
attempt to read a message body and will not send a Response until the
Socket Read times out).
Given my thoughts on the matter, I think it is appropriate for the
Tomcat community to act on the bug report as they see fit...
FYI, I tested TC behavior with an HTTP 1.1 POST without a message
body and
no content-length. It worked, properly. However, I noticed an 8
second delay
between request and response. I assume TC was blocking in a socket
read
until it timed out... That doesn't seem very desirable...
Possible to target the fix for 5.5.14?
No, it's already out. To be honest, I don't really care about the
issue, and you should still be challenging the test.
5.5.15, then. I see that TC Clustering support is broken in 5.5.14,
anyway... I won't comment on challenging/not challenging the test.
--kevan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
