> On Nov 2, 2018, at 9:59 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>
> On 02/11/2018 13:56, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> If you sign and add it to the KEYS file, you should be fine.
>
> Indeed. Also, you signing it is sufficient for it to be included in the
> web of trust but I'd be
If you sign and add it to the KEYS file, you should be fine.
> On Nov 2, 2018, at 9:13 AM, Christopher Schultz
> wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> All,
>
> It looks like I'll need a PGP key used for code-signing in order to RM.
>
> I can create a new PGP key fo
jim: [X] Beta - go ahead and release as 8.0.1 (beta)
All testing looks fine, but don't have a huge test-suite for
this rev.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@t
+1: TC 7 Fed18
On Oct 10, 2013, at 3:49 PM, Christopher Schultz
wrote:
> Mladen,
>
> On 10/10/13 9:18 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
>> Version 1.1.29 is bug fixing release.
>> The proposed release artefacts can be found at [1],
>> and the build was done using tag [2].
>>
>> The VOTE will remain open
Cool!
On Oct 10, 2013, at 2:52 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> On 10/09/2013 04:42 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 05/10/2013 23:39, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>> Sorry to be a pain. The JSR 356 WebSocket implementation is broken with
>>> APR prior to r1525525 [1]. Tomcat 7.0.x and Tomcat 8.0.x need a 1.1.29
>>>
On Sep 26, 2013, at 10:44 AM, Yoav Shapira wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 9:37 AM, Violeta Georgieva wrote:
>> The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.45 release is now available for voting.
>> This release candidate contains JSR-356 Java WebSocket 1.0 implementation.
>> Note that use of this function
On Jul 24, 2012, at 12:17 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 24/07/2012 14:40, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> Any interest in seeing a 5.5.36 release in the near future?
>
> We should to tie up the remaining loose ends before 5.5.x is EOL. No
> great rush at the moment though.
>
Any interest in seeing a 5.5.36 release in the near future?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
On Jul 11, 2012, at 8:25 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> All,
>
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/11427522/ssl-configuration-getting-classpuretlsimplementation-jsse15factory-not-foun
>
> The SO poster is using 5.5.30 but the problem appears to still exist in
> 5.5.35 (latest).
>
> I downlo
On May 29, 2012, at 5:23 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Apache Tomcat Connectors 1.2.37 release candidate is ready
> for vote at [1]. This version solves regression(s)
> found in released version 1.2.36 which can crash web server
> if configured in certain way.
>
>
> The VOTE will remain ope
The Apache Tomcat team announces the immediate availability of Apache
Tomcat 5.5.35 stable.
Apache Tomcat 5.5.35 is primarily a security and bug fix release. All users
of older versions of the Tomcat 5.5 family should upgrade to 5.5.35.
Please refer to the change log for the list of changes:
http
With 3 binding +1 votes, the VOTE PASSES.
Thx to all testers... The files have been moved to the
dist location and 5.5.35 will be announced (and released)
once the mirrors sync up.
On Jan 12, 2012, at 4:11 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> The builds for Tomcat 5.5.35 are ready for testi
The below makes three... I'll wait another day and release
tomorrow (Friday)
On Jan 6, 2012, at 3:19 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> The builds for Tomcat 5.5.35 are ready for testing and approval.
> The candidates binaries are available here:
>
> http://people.apache.or
Done
On Jan 7, 2012, at 5:54 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
> The signature files for all bin tarballs are missing. Can you please add them?
>
> src and zip/exe are OK.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Rainer
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubs
Ugg... sorry, always forget to chmod when moving from Windows to *nix
Fixed.
On Jan 6, 2012, at 4:41 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
> No luck downloading: all files except for the *.asc are 403. They have
> permission 700 on people.apache.org.
>
> Regards,
>
> Rainer
>
> -
The builds for Tomcat 5.5.35 are ready for testing and approval.
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jim/tomcat-5.5/
According to the release process, the 5.5.35 build corresponding to the
tag TOMCAT_5_5_35 [1] is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] Stable
+++
TC 5.5's STATUS file is clean... will wait a few hours and
unless I hear otherwise, will T&R around lunchtime.
On Jan 6, 2012, at 7:36 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> My plan is to T&R today...
>
-
To unsub
My plan is to T&R today...
On Jan 6, 2012, at 2:48 AM, Forrest Xia wrote:
> Good to see a new 5.5.x release soon :-)
>
> On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 8:49 AM, Konstantin Kolinko
> wrote:
>
>> 2011/12/21 Mark Thomas :
>>> On 20/12/2011 10:03, Jim Jagielski wrote:
&
On Dec 20, 2011, at 2:42 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
> On 12/19/2011 10:49 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> I know the 5.5.x change log is short but [1] is one of those annoying
>> (for me any way) bugs it would be nice to get in a fixed release.
>>
>> Jim: Any chance of a 5.5.x tag late
Files placed in dist and changes made to xml/html. Once mirrors
sync up, will svn up the site and announce.
On Sep 22, 2011, at 10:35 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> With 3 binding +1 votes, the Tomcat 5.5.34 build will be/is
> released as STABLE.
>
> I will start the rel
With 3 binding +1 votes, the Tomcat 5.5.34 build will be/is
released as STABLE.
I will start the release process.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache
On Sep 18, 2011, at 3:51 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> The builds for Tomcat 5.5.34 are ready for testing and approval.
> The candidates binaries are available here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~jim/tomcat-5.5/
>
> According to the release process, the 5.5.34 build correspo
The builds for Tomcat 5.5.34 are ready for testing and approval.
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jim/tomcat-5.5/
According to the release process, the 5.5.34 build corresponding to the
tag TOMCAT_5_5_34 [1] is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] Stable
+++
Last I checked it did not have the required 3 +1s and I
hadn't had the chance to test it out. Will try to do so
today and then tag/roll.
On Sep 16, 2011, at 3:05 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2011/9/16 Jim Jagielski :
>> The last remaining promoted STATUS issues have been
>&g
The last remaining promoted STATUS issues have been
committed… I will T&R Tomcat 5.5.34 later on today.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
I should be back from vacation tomorrow evening so I can start
the formal release process Monday! :)
On Aug 16, 2011, at 6:38 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> With Jim likely to be rolling a 5.5.x release next week I have been
> looking at the 5.5.x status file. There are a handful of issues that
> need
I am tempted to do a release next week... we seem to have enough
to warrant it.
On Jul 21, 2011, at 5:57 AM, Sachin Mankapure wrote:
>
> Thanks. I wanted to know *when* 5.5.34 will be available. I got the answer.
>
>
> Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
>>
>> 2011/7/20 msachin :
>>>
>>> Where can I
On Jul 4, 2011, at 2:34 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> The proposed 1.2.32 release is:
> [X] Stable - go ahead and release as 1.2.32 Stable
> [ ] Broken - do not release
+1: OSX and Fed14
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomc
+1
On Jun 28, 2011, at 11:43 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
> +1, great!
>
> On 27.06.2011 20:03, Mladen Turk wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have a time slot available so I volunteer as a 1.2.32 RM.
>> Think we are good for a new release.
>>
>> Comments, objections?
>
> ---
On May 6, 2011, at 11:37 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.13 release is now available for voting.
>
> It can be obtained from:
> http://people.apache.org/~markt/dev/tomcat-7/v7.0.13/
> The svn tag is:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc7.0.x/tags/TOMCAT_7_0_13/
>
On Mar 10, 2011, at 1:50 PM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> On 3/9/2011 11:57 PM, Eiji Takahashi wrote:
>> Hi developers.
>>
>> I encountered the same issue, too.
>> I got following exception.
> an exception is expected if the connection has been abandoned.
> it's tricky, one can always throw
Verified... This seems enough, imo, to warrant a Broken...
On Mar 10, 2011, at 12:09 AM, Keiichi Fujino wrote:
> 2011/3/4 Filip Hanik - Dev Lists :
>> Source and Binary Packages
>> http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/jdbc-pool/v1.1.0.1/
>>
>> Tag
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tags/JDBC_
Hot on the heels of Tomcat 5.5.32, The Apache Tomcat Team announces
the immediate availability of Apache Tomcat 5.5.33 stable.
Apache Tomcat 5.5.33 is primarily a security and bug fix
release. All users of older versions of the Tomcat 5.5
family should upgrade to 5.5.33.
Please refer to the chang
I count more than the required 3 +1 (binding) votes.
Therefore, I deem the 5.5.33 build stable and will start
the release process.
Thanks!!
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-m
+1
On Feb 8, 2011, at 8:22 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Retagged, rerolled and reuploaded... ;)
>
> On Feb 8, 2011, at 8:04 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
Fo
Retagged, rerolled and reuploaded... ;)
On Feb 8, 2011, at 8:04 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> On Feb 8, 2011, at 2:29 AM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
>
>> 2011/2/7 Jim Jagielski :
>>> The builds for Tomcat 5.5.33 are ready for testing and approval.
>>> The candi
On Feb 8, 2011, at 2:29 AM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2011/2/7 Jim Jagielski :
>> The builds for Tomcat 5.5.33 are ready for testing and approval.
>> The candidates binaries are available here:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~jim/tomcat-5.5/
>>
>> Accor
The builds for Tomcat 5.5.33 are ready for testing and approval.
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jim/tomcat-5.5/
According to the release process, the 5.5.33 build corresponding to the
tag TOMCAT_5_5_33 [1] is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] Stable
+++
1
On Feb 2, 2011, at 2:37 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
> The candidates binaries are available here:
> http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.32/
>
> According to the release process, the 6.0.32 build corresponding to the
> tag TOMCAT_6_0_32 is:
> [ ] Broken
> [ ] Alpha
> [ ] Beta
> [X]
go for it.
On Feb 2, 2011, at 10:26 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> All,
>
> I'd like to stick to my plan to release Tomcat 7 every month or so. The
> last release was ~ 3 weeks ago so that suggests next week. However, I
> have some commitments next week that would make tagging and rolling a
> release
The Apache Tomcat Team announces the immediate availability of Apache
Tomcat 5.5.32 stable.
Apache Tomcat 5.5.32 is primarily a security and bug fix
release. All users of older versions of the Tomcat 5.5
family should upgrade to 5.5.32.
Please refer to the change log for the list of changes:
htt
I see more than enough +1-Stable votes to call this
vote closed and the release to proceed!
I will announce and release today...
Thanks to all testers, voters, etc...
On Jan 22, 2011, at 1:01 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> The builds for Tomcat 5.5.32 are ready for testing and approval.
&g
On Jan 28, 2011, at 5:56 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
>
> - 4 errors in run-tester, but I vaguely remember those are
>not regressions (details see below)
>
+1... non regressions (I should have noted them when
I called for the vote).
-
On Jan 24, 2011, at 4:51 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
> The candidates binaries are available here:
> http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.31/
>
> According to the release process, the 6.0.31 build corresponding to the
> tag TOMCAT_6_0_31 is:
> [ ] Broken
> [ ] Alpha
> [ ] Beta
> [
On Jan 22, 2011, at 1:01 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> The builds for Tomcat 5.5.32 are ready for testing and approval.
> The candidates binaries are available here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~jim/tomcat-5.5/
>
> According to the release process, the 5.5.32 build correspo
On Jan 22, 2011, at 1:30 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2011/1/22 Jim Jagielski :
>> The builds for Tomcat 5.5.32 are ready for testing and approval.
>> The candidates binaries are available here:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~jim/tomcat-5.5/
>>
>>
The builds for Tomcat 5.5.32 are ready for testing and approval.
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jim/tomcat-5.5/
According to the release process, the 5.5.32 build corresponding to the
tag TOMCAT_5_5_32 [1] is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] Stable
+++
All remaining code-level changes have been added...
Will tag and roll either later on today or over the weekend.
On Jan 18, 2011, at 10:57 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
> On 01/17/2011 03:02 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> I'd like to look over the remaining STATUS of 5.5 in hopes o
I'd like to look over the remaining STATUS of 5.5 in hopes of
getting a 5.5.32 out soon... I'll RM.
Comments?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
The Apache Tomcat Team announces the immediate availability of Apache
Tomcat 5.5.31 stable.
Apache Tomcat 5.5.31 is primarily a security and bug fix
release. All users of older versions of the Tomcat 5.5
family should upgrade to 5.5.31.
Please refer to the change log for the list of changes:
htt
Why? The fact that the ASF has retired httpd-1.3 doesn't mean
that the world has stopped using it, or *will* stop using it
before the next connectors release.
On Sep 13, 2010, at 5:15 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> On 3/1/2010 4:45 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
>> The Apache Tomcat team announces the
On Sep 8, 2010, at 10:50 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> The builds for Tomcat 5.5.31 are ready for testing and approval.
> The candidates binaries are available here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~jim/tomcat-5.5/
>
> According to the release process, the 5.5.31 build correspo
On Sep 8, 2010, at 10:50 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> The builds for Tomcat 5.5.31 are ready for testing and approval.
> The candidates binaries are available here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~jim/tomcat-5.5/
>
> According to the release process, the 5.5.31 build correspo
On Sep 8, 2010, at 12:02 PM, sebb wrote:
>
> There are some non-trivial souce files without AL headers:
>
> build/build.properties.default
> build/resources/welcome.bin.html
>
> These ones also don't have AL headers, but perhaps comments are not allowed:
>
> build/resources/config.ini
> build/
The builds for Tomcat 5.5.31 are ready for testing and approval.
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jim/tomcat-5.5/
According to the release process, the 5.5.31 build corresponding to the
tag TOMCAT_5_5_31 [1] is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] Stable
+++
On Sep 7, 2010, at 10:36 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 07/09/2010 15:15, sebb wrote:
>> On 4 September 2010 21:06, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sep 4, 2010, at 1:01 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
>>>>
>>>> A more complete solution could be adding
The prelim builds can be found at:
http://people.apache.org/~jim/tomcat-5.5/
I will call for an official vote early next week...
NOTE: This is the new roll which addresses the mail factory classes
missing, cf. BZ 49647
On Sep 4, 2010, at 1:01 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
>
> A more complete solution could be adding geronimo-javamail and
> geronimo-activation to download and compile as standard dependencies. Just an
> idea, I never used or tested this though but recently noticed an analogous
> discussion about Java
On Sep 4, 2010, at 12:28 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> Anyone have any problems if I simply fix the build setup
> to download and build those jars if full.dist is set...?
> In addition to that change and the updating of BUILDING.txt,
> we should hopefully have a repeatable buil
On Sep 4, 2010, at 12:10 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> On Sep 4, 2010, at 11:40 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>>
>> On Sep 4, 2010, at 5:52 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Jim,
>>>
>>> On 03.09.2010 21:20, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
On Sep 4, 2010, at 11:40 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> On Sep 4, 2010, at 5:52 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
>
>> Hi Jim,
>>
>> On 03.09.2010 21:20, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>> The prelim builds can be found at:
>>>
>>> http://people.apache.org
On Sep 4, 2010, at 5:52 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
> Hi Jim,
>
> On 03.09.2010 21:20, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> The prelim builds can be found at:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~jim/tomcat-5.5/
>>
>> I will call for an official vote early next week...
The prelim builds can be found at:
http://people.apache.org/~jim/tomcat-5.5/
I will call for an official vote early next week...
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail
On Sep 3, 2010, at 12:59 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 03/09/2010 17:48, Mladen Turk wrote:
>> On 09/03/2010 06:44 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>> I just committed the only one I saw with => 3 votes...
>>>
>>
>> Think there is one with 3 votes for
Ahh... I see a few more being added... will hold of for
a little bit.
I propose a T&R on Monday then; that gives today and the weekend
for people to vote and pick off the remaining low hanging
fruit.
On Sep 3, 2010, at 12:44 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> I just committed the only one I s
I just committed the only one I saw with => 3 votes...
On Sep 3, 2010, at 12:34 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> On 09/03/2010 06:19 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> I think we're at the stage where I can go ahead and T&R Tomcat 5.5.31...
>>
>> Anyone disagree?
>>
&g
I think we're at the stage where I can go ahead and T&R Tomcat 5.5.31...
Anyone disagree?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
On Aug 30, 2010, at 7:31 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
> On 30.08.2010 13:13, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> I was thinking the same thing... I want to test and verify
>> the patches and then will likely T&R 5.5 later this week or
>> early next week (depending on feedback ;) ).
>
I was thinking the same thing... I want to test and verify
the patches and then will likely T&R 5.5 later this week or
early next week (depending on feedback ;) ).
On Aug 27, 2010, at 5:28 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> There was a packaging error in 5.5.31 that will need a 5.5.31 as well as
> a handfu
Hopefully better late than never:
+1
On Aug 5, 2010, at 5:09 PM, Jason Brittain wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> [X] Beta - go ahead and release as 7.0.2 Beta
>>
>
> It seems very close to stable, to me.
>
> One thing I noticed while testing 7.0.2 is that the WebModule MBean
> ObjectNames differ sligh
The Apache Tomcat Team announces the immediate availability of Apache
Tomcat 5.5.30 stable.
Apache Tomcat 5.5.30 is primarily a security and bug fix
release. All users of older versions of the Tomcat 5.5
family should upgrade to 5.5.30.
Please refer to the change log for the list of changes:
htt
The Apache Tomcat Team announces the immediate availability of Apache
Tomcat 5.5.30 stable.
Apache Tomcat 5.5.30 is primarily a security and bug fix
release. All users of older versions of the Tomcat 5.5
family should upgrade to 5.5.30.
Please refer to the change log for the list of changes:
ht
On Jul 1, 2010, at 12:11 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> The builds for Tomcat 5.5.30 are ready for testing and approval.
> The candidates binaries are available here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~jim/tomcat-5.5/
>
> According to the release process, the 5.5.30 build correspo
On Jul 7, 2010, at 9:59 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
> On 01.07.2010 18:11, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> According to the release process, the 5.5.30 build corresponding to the
>> tag TOMCAT_5_5_30 [1] is:
>>
>> [ ] Broken
>> [ ] Alpha
>> [ ] Beta
>> [X] Stab
On Jul 4, 2010, at 11:15 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 04/07/2010 12:00, Rainer Jung wrote:
>> The fixcrlf handling of RTF files when packed into the source
>> distribution has changed as a side effect of
>>
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=893572
>>
>> It was "don't change"
my vote, btw...
On Jul 1, 2010, at 12:11 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> The builds for Tomcat 5.5.30 are ready for testing and approval.
> The candidates binaries are available here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~jim/tomcat-5.5/
>
> According to the release process
On Jul 1, 2010, at 12:58 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2010/7/1 Jim Jagielski :
>> The builds for Tomcat 5.5.30 are ready for testing and approval.
>> The candidates binaries are available here:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~jim/tomcat-5.5/
>>
>
The builds for Tomcat 5.5.30 are ready for testing and approval.
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jim/tomcat-5.5/
According to the release process, the 5.5.30 build corresponding to the
tag TOMCAT_5_5_30 [1] is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] Stable
+++
On Jun 30, 2010, at 3:33 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
> On 06/30/2010 05:20 AM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
>> 2010/6/29 jean-frederic clere :
>>> Due to bugs (49445 and 49424) and as I was not able to finish the
>>> release process quickly (because of working remotely) and as releases
>>> are ch
On Jun 8, 2010, at 4:50 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 07/06/2010 15:38, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> The next Tomcat 7.0.0 release candiate is ready for testing. 7.0.0-RC4
>> can be obtained from:
>> http://people.apache.org/~markt/dev/tomcat-7/v7.0.0-RC4/
>> The svn tag is:
>> http://svn.apac
+1
On Jun 10, 2010, at 1:59 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I plan to tag 6.0.27 on Monday (European morning) and start the release
> process.
>
> Comments?
>
> Cheers
>
> Jean-Frederic
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-ma
On Mar 31, 2010, at 9:52 AM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> The candidates binaries are available here:
> http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/tomcat/tomcat-5.5/v5.5.29/
>
> According to the release process, the 5.5.29 tag is:
> [ ] Broken
> [ ] Alpha
> [ ] Beta
> [X] Stable
>
+1
-
This is best for both the Users lists for tomcat and httpd, but...
On Mar 11, 2010, at 11:17 PM, westside wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am completely new to Tomcat, and I'm trying to setup this module named
> "mod_proxy_html module" I have just installed a product called JIRA and I
> have it working wi
On Mar 9, 2010, at 12:19 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
> The candidates binaries are available here:
> http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.26/
>
> According to the release process, the 6.0.26 tag is:
> [ ] Broken
> [ ] Alpha
> [ ] Beta
> [X] Stable
>
-
I'm +1
On Feb 15, 2010, at 2:57 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Give me 24hrs... I'll be able to test tomorrow AM.
>
> On Feb 15, 2010, at 1:54 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
>
>> On 02/10/2010 11:19 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>
On Feb 16, 2010, at 9:03 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
> On 02/16/2010 12:52 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> Mainly a question for Jean-Frederic, but what are the thoughts on aiming
>> for a 6.0.25 release quite soon? There were a handful of regressions in
>> 6.0.24 it would be good to fix.
>>
>
> +
Give me 24hrs... I'll be able to test tomorrow AM.
On Feb 15, 2010, at 1:54 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> On 02/10/2010 11:19 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>
> Ping. Anyone?
>
>
> Regards
> --
> ^TM
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-
On Jan 19, 2010, at 9:25 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
> The candidates binaries are available here:
> http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.24/
>
> According to the release process, the 6.0.24 tag is:
> [X] Stable
>
Tested OK w/ no regressions from 6.0.20.
+1
On Jan 8, 2010, at 8:02 AM, Yoav Shapira wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 9:50 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
>> Apache Tomcat Native 1.1.19 is:
>>
>> [ X ] Stable - no major issues, no regressions
>> [ ] Beta - at least one significant issue -- tell us what it is
>> [ ] Alpha - multiple significa
On Dec 22, 2009, at 4:32 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 22/12/2009 09:11, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>> On 12/22/2009 09:28 AM, Henri Gomez wrote:
Up till now we always had tcnative-1.dll not libtcnative-1.dll
so it's just broken build comming from private builds,
because there is no
On Sep 19, 2009, at 5:40 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
I've pushed the current state of the Taglibs site out:
http://tomcat.apache.org/taglibs/
It's not ready to go live, but it gives us a good feel for what's
left to do.
Thx!
-
Just clarification: The tgz is broken. Assuming that is fixed,
I see no problems and the actual *codebase* is
[X] Stable
On May 20, 2009, at 12:36 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
[X] Broken
On May 20, 2009, at 11:50 AM, sebb wrote:
extras/catalina-ws.jar does not have a NOTICE or a LICENSE file
[X] Broken
On May 20, 2009, at 11:50 AM, sebb wrote:
extras/catalina-ws.jar does not have a NOTICE or a LICENSE file.
All jars should ideally have N&L files, but they must be present if
the jar is published separately, as appears to be the case here.
The EXE fails to install the following fil
On Mar 5, 2009, at 4:36 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
Rainer Jung wrote:
On 05.03.2009 10:03, Mark Thomas wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
Mark Thomas wrote:
I stumbled across some code in trunk for this. I had a poke
around and
as far as
I can tell this hasn't been supported for quite some time. What
On Nov 2, 2008, at 8:22 AM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
now that we do have a module directory, I'd like to propose to take
the bayeux impl out of tomcat core, and put it into an individual
module
reasons
1. It's built on top of Tomcat, but its not core tomcat
2. We can release it more
On Oct 28, 2008, at 8:59 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
[+1] Stable - no major issues, no regressions
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Oct 21, 2008, at 4:05 PM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Let's get a feel for what we think we should do.
Based on
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46038
I believe (pick only one):
c. [+1] Bring it here, we'll make it an independent module with its
own release cycle
On Oct 3, 2008, at 9:33 AM, Yoav Shapira wrote:
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 1:56 AM, Mladen Turk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to create a branch of connectors
for native component so it depends on the
new APR 1.3.x API
+1.
Like Mark, I'm also OK with removal.
+1
+1
On Oct 3, 2008, at 9:47 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
I would like to propose creating two new products in bugzilla:
- Tomcat mod_jk
- Tomcat APR-native
I am open to suggestions for better component names.
The bug reporting pages on the website and in the docs would need to
be
updated.
Advan
Hopefully not too late:
On Sep 8, 2008, at 8:11 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tcnative/v1.1.15/
According to the release process, the 1.1.15 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[X] Stable
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
1 - 100 of 269 matches
Mail list logo
