On Dec 22, 2009, at 4:32 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:

> On 22/12/2009 09:11, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>> On 12/22/2009 09:28 AM, Henri Gomez wrote:
>>>> Up till now we always had tcnative-1.dll not libtcnative-1.dll
>>>> so it's just broken build comming from private builds,
>>>> because there is no 1.1.18 binaries in w.a.o/dist/
>>>> Meaning:
>>>> 1. Wrong tcnative
>>>> 2. Build is not reproducable
>>>> 
>>>> I'd say the packaging is broken, not the 6.0.21 itself.
>>> 
>>> So nothing prevent from a release of 6.0.21 ?
>> 
>> I just have to redo the package and produce the missing tcnative-1.dlls.
> 
> You'll need to revert some of the changes you made to the tag as well.
> It might be cleaner to create a new tag. i.e.
> - delete the current 6.0.21 tag
> - set the version in 6.0.x/trunk
> - tag 6.0.21
> - reset the version in 6.0.x/trunk
> - regenerate the release candidate
> 
> Only a thought though. As long as the source tarball we vote on a)
> matches the tag and b) can be used to generate the release binaries
> everything else is academic.
> 

+1


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org

Reply via email to