tomcat native 1.1.15 or 1.1.16?

ttp://www.nabble.com/-RESULT---VOTE--Releasing-Apache-Tomcat-Native-1.1.16-td20483235.html -- Haroon Rafique - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org

slight gotcha with tomcat 6.0 cluster startup with already running tomcat 5 cluster on the network

uation and display a more helpful message? Thanks, -- Haroon Rafique <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

mod_jk 1.2.26 and stricter check for VirtualHosts

me as if they were in the parent. Posting on the dev list to continue discussion here. Regards, -- Haroon Rafique <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Quality check mod_jk 1.2.25-dev

gt; Works fine for me on Gentoo Linux w/ Apache 2.2.4. w/ APR 1.2.8. Cheers, -- Haroon Rafique <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [ANN] Apache Tomcat 5.5.23 released

HDL> Filip Synopsis seems to be that the "optional" jar for javamail not being present causes this bug to resurface once again. Perhaps the release manager can: a) modify the tomcat build instructions to make this jar "not so optional" any more b) fix the build file t

Re: mod_jk problem when streaming files larger than ~400k (causes ClientAbortException)

gt; worker.local.port=8009 HG> > worker.local.host=localhost HG> > My situation is the opposite. I have apache 2.0.59 and tomcat 5.5.20 on the same machine (local) and the problem occurs. I never tried with network. I will make a bugzilla issue

Re: mod_jk problem when streaming files larger than ~400k (causes ClientAbortException)

On Today at 3:11pm, J=>Jean-Frederic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: J> J> I can't reproduce something like that with 5.5.17, could you try with a J> TC5.5.x? J> J> Cheers J> J> Jean-Frederic Hi Jean, My reported problem occurs on 5.5.20. Regards,

mod_jk problem when streaming files larger than ~400k (causes ClientAbortException)

-t2756411.html If I don't get any responses, then I can submit a bugzilla bug with a "testcase" war file and its source (maven driven) so that the devs can play around with it. Cheers, -- Haroon Rafique <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- Forwarded message -- Date: Mon, 4 De

Re: patch for ManagerServlet (was Re: yet another tomcat goes stable and I still have to make a custom package)

On Apr 6 at 9:54am, HR=>Haroon Rafique <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: HR> On Mar 22 at 3:04pm, FHDL=>Filip Hanik - Dev Lists <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: HR> HR> FH> patch looks good to me, +1, HR> FH> if no objections arise, then I can submit, we'll wait unt

patch for ManagerServlet (was Re: yet another tomcat goes stable and I still have to make a custom package)

H> Any status on committing the above patch attached to bug 36847? -- Haroon Rafique <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: yet another tomcat goes stable and I still have to make a custom package

On Today at 2:47pm, HR=>Haroon Rafique <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: HR> HR> Patch 17943 submitted on bugzilla 36847. That should read Patch 17944. My mistake. -- Haroon Rafique <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - T

Re: yet another tomcat goes stable and I still have to make a custom package

d=17944 http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36847 Regards, -- Haroon Rafique <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: yet another tomcat goes stable and I still have to make a custom package

copy(localWar, secondCopy); } All done! YS> Like Filip, I'd -1 the patch as is because it's too general and YS> doesn't seem to take into account scenarios where the two paths are YS> different so the copy does not result in a

Re: yet another tomcat goes stable and I still have to make a custom package

e to work for? a) People with default configuration b) People with esoteric configurations that are yet to be discovered I would guess a) since most people run with CATALINA_HOME and CATALINA_BASE as the same. In addition, I have also shown that even if CATALINA_HOME and CATALINA_BASE are different

Re: yet another tomcat goes stable and I still have to make a custom package

;m beginning to understand the full implications. FHDL> Fliip I don't know much about running a different CATALINA_BASE and CATALINA_HOME but I'll try in a second and report back the results. Thanks, -- Haroon Rafique <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ---

Re: yet another tomcat goes stable and I still have to make a custom package

esses some frustration. YS> > I agree about test-coverage. YS> YS> More tests in this area would be awesome. YS> YS> Yoav YS> Cheers, -- Haroon Rafique <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: yet another tomcat goes stable and I still have to make a custom package

On Today at 9:29am, FHDL=>Filip Hanik - Dev Lists <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: FHDL> Haroon Rafique wrote: FHDL> >/www/apache-tomcat-5.5.16/webapps/sws.war FHDL> >/www/tomcat/webapps/sws.war FHDL> FHDL> this would turn my vote into -1, based on false information prov

Re: yet another tomcat goes stable and I still have to make a custom package

ined with the fact that the whole operation is inside a if (tag != null) {} leads me to believe that it is safe to take out the 2nd copy() method. Believe me, with the 2nd copy() method in tact, remote deploying via ant while tagging does *NOT* work. RM> RM> Pl

Re: yet another tomcat goes stable and I still have to make a custom package

-( Sorry to hear that, but at least you responded. Neutral is better than negative. FHDL> FHDL> Filip FHDL> Cheers, -- Haroon Rafique <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: yet another tomcat goes stable and I still have to make a custom package

gth file. Can you see my pain at this point? The code has basically guaranteed a 0-length file. Why is step 3) even necessary? Furthermore, I can confirm for you that taking out the offending lines, makes remote war deployment via tags 100% successful for me. YS> [..snip..] YS> Thank

yet another tomcat goes stable and I still have to make a custom package

developer be kind enough to take a look at the bug and commit it, so that it makes it into the next stable release? I have sent reminder emails before but have gotten no response. Is there anything else I can do? Thanks In Advance, -- Haroon Rafique <[EMAIL PROTEC

RE: never say never...

;w=2 Subject: squeaky wheel gets the oil (so please fix bug 36847) So, yes, the persistent among us will keep trying but, for sure, a few of use will be turned away for good. Cheers, -- Haroon Rafique <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

squeaky wheel gets the oil (so please fix bug 36847)

a custom tomcat installation every time I upgrade. And it might also help someone else avoid this bug in the future. Regards, -- Haroon Rafique <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional com

solicit some interest in fixing bug 36847 (PatchAvailable)

Hi, Can I solicit some interest from the tomcat developers to fix a rather trivial (yet annoying) bug which has an easy fix available? The bug in question is: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36847 Thanks in advance, -- Haroon Rafique <[EMAIL PROTEC