optimizations apply nor do I see how LLVM rules apply. I
thought JIT behavior was only controlled by what the JLS said.
Still hoping to learn more…
david jencks
> On Sep 16, 2015, at 4:50 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>
> On 16/09/2015 06:38, David Jencks wrote:
>> At this point I tend to agree
saying it ‘has
different logic” and “has a timing window” might be true but don’t directly
mean that if violates the ch. 14 semantics.
Hoping to learn more….
david jencks
> On Sep 15, 2015, at 9:58 PM, Yilong Li
> wrote:
>
> Your argument seems to assume that reordering is t
patterns like this consistently. I think that the only practical way
to detect these is through analysis tooling, so I’m glad to see it exists.
thanks
david jencks
> On Sep 15, 2015, at 6:33 PM, Yilong Li
> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 3:09 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>
&
For many years Geronimo has had a modified tomcat version implementing jaspic.
I offered it to tomcat when I wrote it but was declined.
thanks
david jencks
On Feb 10, 2015, at 1:05 PM, Fjodor Vershinin wrote:
> Hello!
> I am CS student and it looks like that this task is quite interest
ne place, maybe
we could investigate something like giving any other-project committer with
interest in working on a spec jar commit rights in geronimo. I don't think
spec jar releases have ever been a big timing/delay problem.
thanks
david jencks
On May 16, 2014, at 7:32 AM, Mark Thomas
Geronimo's xbean-finder also supplies this functionality using asm.
david jencks
On Jun 14, 2013, at 9:55 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 14 June 2013 17:35, Christopher Schultz
> wrote:
>> Mark,
>>
>> On 6/14/13 12:21 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>> On 14/06
On Apr 21, 2013, at 3:56 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
> On Apr 19, 2013, at 11:04 PM, David Jencks wrote:
>> IMO you have misinterpreted roles in the ee specs. The specs including the
>> servlet spec define application roles and base the declarative security
>> constraints o
ml#bncax which indicates
very clearly that Sun thinks groups are not roles and that you need a flexible
mapping between them. (see the sun-web-app snippet at the bottom).
thanks
david jencks
On Apr 19, 2013, at 2:28 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> Currently, Tomcat only checks against elements if
Umm, a few years ago I was quite interested in implementing it for tomcat, but
couldn't raise any support over here. I still think the geronimo-tomcat-jaspic
integration could be adapted to tomcat standalone pretty easily, although I
don't think I'll have time to work on it
On Dec 19, 2011, at 1:06 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
> On 12/19/2011 07:47 PM, David Jencks wrote:
>> Are you reading the thread? I mentioned dec 17 that geronimo has
>> been maintaining a script for 2+ years that pulls tomcat source out
>> of tomcat svn and puts i
Thanks for your brevity, Mark
On Dec 19, 2011, at 11:24 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 19/12/2011 18:47, David Jencks wrote:
>> Are you reading the thread? I mentioned dec 17 that geronimo has
>> been maintaining a script for 2+ years that pulls tomcat source out
>> of tomc
.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/external/trunk/tomcat-archetype with
e.g an example of what you get from the script
underhttps://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/external/trunk/tomcat-parent-7.0.19
david jencks
On Dec 19, 2011, at 10:20 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> On 12/19/2011 07:04 PM, Henri Go
/repos/asf/geronimo/external/trunk/tomcat-archetype with
e.g an example of what you get from the script under
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/external/trunk/tomcat-parent-7.0.19
thanks
david jencks
On Dec 17, 2011, at 1:12 PM, David Jencks wrote:
> I'll try to keep it short b
t which point I realized discussion was useless.
Maven prevents problems like this through the project structure. If this
situation is not a problem to the tomcat community, then the other possible
benefits of using maven are not likely to be interesting either.
thanks
david jencks
On Dec 17, 20
On Oct 14, 2011, at 9:18 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 14/10/2011 17:09, David Jencks wrote:
>> If using a non-tomcat groupId is the
>> only choice I'd keep the openejb copy in apache svn.
>
> That is not an option that is acceptable to the ASF infrastructure team.
In
cat distro under any other groupid
than the tomcat one seems calculated to confuse everyone in every way possible.
If using a non-tomcat groupId is the only choice I'd keep the openejb copy in
apache svn.
thanks
david jencks
>
> Mark
>
>
Thanks for your response!
On Oct 12, 2011, at 9:56 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2011/10/12 David Jencks :
>> I've been working with someone who has deeply nested SimpleTags (generated
>> from jsp source) that use a lot of regular Tags. By default the jasper
>&
on a patch.
thanks
david jencks
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
ches and
faces-config.xml discovery that geronimo has more or less working solutions
for. If you run into these kinds of problems any solution will be proprietary.
thanks
david jencks
On Nov 6, 2010, at 10:27 AM, Misha Koshelev wrote:
> Hi David and all:
>
> Thank you for the reference
p the bundle/bundle
context in jndi and get it injected into your ee components.
Whether or not this is something you want to look into I'd suggest you look
into a container that supports WABs.
thanks
david jencks
On Nov 5, 2010, at 9:02 PM, Misha Koshelev wrote:
> Dear All:
>
> My
Would you consider putting the time unit (seconds) in the param name or at
least in _all_ the javadoc? Without documentation I would expect the natural
time unit to be minutes.
thanks
david jencks
On Oct 29, 2010, at 4:22 PM, rj...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: rjung
> Date: Fri Oct 29
rvletRegistration. I added some hooks in one of my patches so the info got
to an appropriate class but only implemented the actual processing in geronimo.
see https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50015
thanks
david jencks
> 2. It does.
> 3. It does (as have all 7.0.x releas
ved files) but the part that shows the
modifications of the moved files should.
Supplying an svn script for the file move rather than a patch means that svn
history will be preserved. A patch just from svn mv won't re
his provides what I think is a significant code simplification and has a
better division of responsibility for proecessing and running jsps.
49937 Problems with AsyncListener and resource injection
This one is probably controversial since the spec is contradictory on the
subject.
thanks
david jencks
ience with IDE specific files is that checking them into svn usually
causes far more problems that it solves. Maybe you'll be lucky and solve more
than you cause. If I'm the only IDEA user I'd appreciate your not putting IDEA
t of an EE
technology-compliant implementation. I guess this means that unless tomcat
implements web profile they don't have to support this? It still seems like a
good idea to me.
thanks
david jencks
On Sep 22, 2010, at 10:36 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I want to b
On Sep 15, 2010, at 10:51 PM, David Jencks wrote:
>
> On Sep 15, 2010, at 9:58 PM, David Jencks wrote:
>
>> I think this is how AsyncContextImpl creates async listeners (lines 228ff)
>>
>> @Override
>> public T createListener(Class clazz)
>>
On Sep 15, 2010, at 9:58 PM, David Jencks wrote:
> I think this is how AsyncContextImpl creates async listeners (lines 228ff)
>
>@Override
>public T createListener(Class clazz)
>throws ServletException {
>T listener = null;
>try {
&
llegalArgumentException(sm.getString(
"applicationContext.addListener.iae.wrongType",
t.getClass().getName()));
}
which doesn't accept AsyncListeners. (of course it shouldn't do anything w
On Sep 8, 2010, at 11:48 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 09/09/2010 00:54, David Jencks wrote:
>> I've recently rewritten the geronimo-jetty integration to work off the
>> servlet 3 *Registration classes. This works great except for servlets
>> backed by jsp files, si
SP_FILE request attribute?
thanks
david jencks
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
expect the
commercial vendors to support it as well in their ee6 releases.
There does seem to be remarkable reluctance on the part of users to consider
trying it. Do you have any idea why?
thanks
david jencks
>
> - Chuck
>
>
> THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL A
On Apr 28, 2010, at 4:14 PM, Pid wrote:
> On 28/04/2010 23:40, David Jencks wrote:
>> I'd be curious how many of the features in securityfilter can be done with
>> servlet 3 (which includes the ability for an app to programatically force a
>> login) and jaspic (j
ks to me as if all
the features in your brief description are now supported by ee specs, which
also offer the advantages of container managed authorization.
thanks
david jencks
On Apr 28, 2010, at 10:49 AM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SH
27;t in such a block so
I'm assuming it's not really needed.
thanks
david jencks
On Jan 5, 2010, at 9:41 AM, David Jencks wrote:
On Jan 4, 2010, at 2:56 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 04/01/2010 02:46, Tim Whittington wrote:
No need to re-post. A ping would have sufficed.
We
it for creating
objects that are expected to come from the system rather than
application classes is reasonable. I'll try to come up with a patch
using this additional method in the next day or two.
thanks again!
david jencks
Mark
--
roach.
BTW, has anyone tried to find out if the split into catalina.jar and
coyote.jar works in osgi?
thanks
david jencks
On Dec 19, 2009, at 5:12 PM, David Jencks wrote:
In the tomcat-7 geronimo/osgi integration we've run into a problem
when tomcat loads listener classes using Class.fo
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4992
Many thanks!
david jencks
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Mark,
I've verified that your fix in rev 890479 works great for this.
Many thanks for fixing it so quickly!
david jencks
On Dec 14, 2009, at 11:25 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 14/12/2009 03:58, David Jencks wrote:
I can verify by experiment that the 2nd solution fixes the problem
with
On Dec 13, 2009, at 12:46 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 13/12/2009 09:50, David Jencks wrote:
It looks to me as if the problem is that no JarScanner is installed
in
the ServletContext used by JspC. (There definitely isn't one
installed,
and I think that is the cause of the problem)
uld be great to have some
advice on how this is supposed to work and confirmation that my
theories on what is wrong are reasonable.
thanks
david jencks
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Are you using a SPNEGO enabled
browser on a platform where it can recognize your (client side)
kerberos login? Do you have a link to a description of how SPNEGO is
supposed to work?
thanks
david jencks
Thanks and Regards
Ashish
On 11/13/09, Costin Manolache wrote:
On Fri, Nov 13, 20
On Aug 4, 2009, at 1:18 PM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
does it load all the classes?
IIUC no, it uses asm for byte-code inspection without loading classes.
thanks
david jencks
I think byte code check might make more sense if that is the case
Filip
On 08/04/2009 01:50 PM, David Jencks
adocs.
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-servlet_3.0_spec/1.0-EA-SNAPSHOT/
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/trunk/geronimo-servlet_3.0_spec
thanks
david jencks
On Aug 4, 2009, at 11:11 AM, Costin Manolache wrote:
Hi, a
ains
the identity info including the principal but that trying to enforce
usage of a particular principal class is not a good idea. cf the
jaspic integration I mentioned the other day.
thanks
david jencks
Mark
-
To unsubscri
t I do not expect to be
providing any patches to tomcat for this. I'm happy to talk about the
code, but I'm more likely to see discussion on the geronimo dev list.
thanks
david jencks
-
To unsubscribe,
are saying.
Other things is trivial, just testing the dist.apache.org
with archive.apache.org as fallback for the remaining
dependencies.
I didn't mention this before either but I don't understand why tomcat
is rebuilding the eclipse code. Th
On Jul 10, 2009, at 5:01 PM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
On 07/10/2009 05:19 PM, Yoav Shapira wrote:
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 6:26 PM, David
Jencks wrote:
I am well aware that the tomcat developers regard ant as the one
true build
Having now used Maven 2.x for a couple of years
vn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/trunk/plugins/tomcat/geronimo-tomcat6
thanks
david jencks
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
this other than
using a maven like project layout whether you use maven, ant, ivy, or
something else. Maybe an ant expert can come up with something.
thanks
david jencks
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apac
point here is to easily
support both constraint based checking (as done in tomcat today) and
jacc based permission checking (as done in geronimo and presumably
other javaee integrations such as jboss)
thanks
david jencks
--
Sincerely yours and Best Regards,
Xie Xiaodong
-
or various platforms including java, .net, c++, etc.
thanks
david jencks
On Apr 4, 2009, at 8:42 AM, Costin Manolache wrote:
On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 8:12 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
Costin Manolache wrote:
So in essence you have a new protocol but the sole
difference is how you describe it.
T
auth thingy. The auth thingy
gets called once per request before the request gets to any filters or
servlets.
thanks
david jencks
--
Rahul Saxena
B.Tech Part III
Computer Science and Engineering
I.T. B.H.U. ,Varanasi
Contact No.-09452196645
not occur again for
dispatches. If you can arrange for this with a filter then the rest
of the jsr 196 implementation should not be too hard.
thanks
david jencks
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 3:02 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
Rahul Saxena wrote:
If we derive several servlets form s generic servlet and t
umm, concatinate >> concatenate
david jencks
On Feb 20, 2009, at 10:17 AM, ma...@apache.org wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Fri Feb 20 18:17:29 2009
New Revision: 746321
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=746321&view=rev
Log:
Fix spelling
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/javax/servlet
cf
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/trunk/geronimo-servlet_3.0_spec
Is there a new draft of 3.0 or is this for the first public draft?
thanks
david jencks
On Jan 6, 2009, at 7:15 AM, ma...@apache.org wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Tue Jan 6 07:15:32 2009
New Revision: 731967
Since you are putting this in a separate jar, what would you think of
using a package name appropriate for the tomcat project, since these
classes are tomcat/jasper specific and not a product of apache as a
whole?
thanks
david jencks
On Dec 27, 2008, at 2:17 PM, ma...@apache.org wrote
On Dec 6, 2008, at 9:30 AM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
there has to be a way to automate this, since I'm a frequent
offender, is there some SVN script we could do?
http://www.apache.org/dev/svn-eol-style.txt ?
david jencks
Filip
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: markt
Date
t have a jaspi implementation although I
expect it to be a part of javaee 6, and I'm mostly interested in
trying to understand what you are trying to do rather than suggesting
an implementation strategy.
thanks
david jencks
There is a Microsoft “specification” (bug?) by which
eronimo uses xbean-reflect to handle
object creation and configuration which is a very elegant solution IMO.
I'll try to find some time to remind myself of how this works and
comment on it but it may be a while.
thanks
david jencks
I'll try searching the mail archives - the c
y to
do this, i.e. war and the
deployment. There is no standard API to install/uninstall/start/stop
a .war
umm, jsr-88??
david jencks
- but HttpService
is not that either. Runtime config changes ( adding/removing servlets
without web.xml changes
and re-deployment ) is not specified, but it's a w
ional memory; the only place I know
of this being available is in haskell.
just my highly biased $0.02
david jencks
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For addit
es of this kind of behavior that actually work under load?
thanks
david jencks
Paul
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 7:24 PM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote:
Hi to all,
Did there is plans, ideas or interest around about OSGI-fing
Tomcat ?
I've
On Mar 7, 2008, at 12:46 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
David Jencks wrote:
I wondered if there would be consensus that this is a bug
+1
and the proposed fix is appropriate?
+1
Please raise a BZ ticket so this doesn't get lost.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44562
I di
it fixes the problem. I don't know if there would
be formatting issues applying the patch to tomcat's copy of the spec
classes.
I wondered if there would be consensus that this is a bug and the
proposed fix is appropriate?
thanks
david jencks
/GERONIMO-3417
(click on "all")
david jencks
- Original Message
From: Filip Hanik - Dev Lists <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Tomcat Developers List
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 8:10:36 AM
Subject: [PROPOSAL] Add to changelog.xml
since
we
have
the
ability
to
add
al is
is to recognize duplicate rules.
thanks
david jencks
On Feb 12, 2008, at 4:42 PM, Tim Funk wrote:
In that case - that would revert the functionality which caused the
issue to arrive in the first place.
The original bug had a problem because they had the same listener
class dec
spec jars. I think consistent behavior independent of which
spec jar you happen to pick would be desirable.
thanks
david jencks
Filip
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTE
I don't think this is relevant to the 6.0.x branch, it depends on the
new DefaultInstanceManager class which AFAIK is only in trunk.
thanks
david jencks
On Jan 17, 2008, at 1:47 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: pero
Date: Thu Jan 17 13:47:24 2008
New Revision: 612992
URL:
Sorry, this is my fault. I attached a patch to fix it to http://
issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44261.
thanks
david jencks
On Jan 17, 2008, at 5:01 AM, Peter Rossbach wrote:
Why this message was logged?
17.01.2008 13:57:45 org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngine start
INFO
Would this be from trunk or from a previous 6.0.x branch? I seem to
recall some concerns about including the annotation processing
changes that are now in trunk in a 6.0.x release and some thought
that a version number more like 6.1 would be more appropriate.
thanks
david jencks
On Jan 4
dency injection. What did you have in mind?
thanks
david jencks
2. cluster JMX configurations
+1
3. any NIO improvements that haven't been ported
+1
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional comman
On Nov 11, 2007, at 1:24 AM, David Jencks wrote:
On Nov 10, 2007, at 2:12 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Sat Nov 10 14:12:54 2007
New Revision: 593815
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=593815&view=rev
Log:
Add JSP schema fix
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/ST
noted in a reply to the commit email I think you have replaced the
files Remy checked in with geronimo's copies of those files, so if
I'm correct you have not improved the legal situation.
thanks
david jencks
--
un licensed xsds.
We have not found any authority or reasoning that would let us do
so. I believe the apache policy now allows us to put small numbers
of CDDL schemas in apache svn and ship them but AFAIK we have not yet
done so.
l
eliminate trunk with some concern.
thanks
david jencks
Now we are in a technical debate between comet implementation
between Remy
and Filips "designs". This has seemed to migrate into a personal
attack in
a subtle manner.
Such is life when coding. Disagreements
jasper
org.apache.tomcat
jasper
6.0.13-G543818
thanks
david jencks
On Jun 21, 2007, at 6:37 AM, Ke
idates all other sessions with that sessionId
After a lot of discussion with the jetty devs I got them to implement
this, but I've never been able to understand the discussions about
the subject on the tomcat lists so I'm really not sure what the
expected behavior of tomca
On May 24, 2007, at 10:10 AM, Remy Maucherat wrote:
David Jencks wrote:
I tend to agree that a new branch is more appropriate. However,
earlier versions of the patch had a compatibility layer so the old
api could continue to work. I'm happy to add that back in on
request.
On May 17, 2007, at 2:41 AM, Remy Maucherat wrote:
David Jencks wrote:
As far as I know I've addressed all the issues that were raised,
but that might have a tenuous relationship to whether I actually
did :-). I'd certainly appreciate review by tomcat committers
before I
On May 16, 2007, at 1:10 PM, Paul McMahan wrote:
On Apr 12, 2007, at 12:15 PM, Remy Maucherat wrote:
David Jencks wrote:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12355273/
GERONIMO-3010-4.patch In addition, this one combines the
InstanceManager interfaces. I think this is a bad
On Apr 12, 2007, at 9:15 AM, Remy Maucherat wrote:
David Jencks wrote:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12355273/
GERONIMO-3010-4.patch In addition, this one combines the
InstanceManager interfaces. I think this is a bad idea because it
forces jasper to use an interface
of modern jvms
to eliminate the need to allow replacing the classloader in the
jasper InstanceManager at runtime. Unfortunately I doubt I'll have
time for this in the next month or so.
On Apr 6, 2007, at 5:03 AM, Remy Maucherat wrote:
David Jencks wrote:
but I won't put it in t
On Apr 6, 2007, at 2:54 AM, Remy Maucherat wrote:
David Jencks wrote:
i've worked on this some more and come up with a patch that I feel
more or less comfortable showing to tomcat :-) at https://
issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3010 or directly https://
issues.apache.org/jira/s
On Mar 27, 2007, at 8:31 PM, David Jencks wrote:
Right now, it's mostly pita-win (it's a significant
refactoring) :D You should IMO offer some incentive as part of
this to justify the refactoring, such as support for web.xml
annotation overrides in standalone Tomcat (as y
On Apr 3, 2007, at 7:19 PM, Yoav Shapira wrote:
Hi,
On 4/3/07, David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Following Remy's suggestion I implemented web.xml overrides of
annotations but although the result compiles I have no very good way
to determine if it works. I looked aroun
only test the geronimo javaee integration with the javaee
tck, but that doesn't use the code in question. If the standalone
tck is the normal test method, is there some way I could get access
to it?
thanks
david jencks
-
On Mar 27, 2007, at 10:39 AM, Remy Maucherat wrote:
David Jencks wrote:
compiled jsps
If you read the spec literally, they can't be annotated, but this
is quite arbitrary IMO (as soon as they're mapped in web.xml, they
can).
Doh! Of course you're right. I just haven&#x
On Mar 25, 2007, at 7:40 PM, Remy Maucherat wrote:
David Jencks wrote:
I personally think the AnnotationProcessor is a very questionable
idea and hope no one uses it. However, it is pretty common now.
The point of the adapter is to show that tomcat can still support
people who want to
g pain in practice. Since
externals are no longer needed to reorganize the source tree how
about checking in a little notice into current/tc6+ indicating where
the source actually is.
thanks
david jencks
-
To unsubscribe, e-m
ike to get your feedback, this is a chance step for our two
communities to work together.
There's certainly interest on the geronimo side.
Many thanks
david jencks
Filip
-
To unsu
and jasper
(independently) with the LifecycleProvider instances of your choice.
Many thanks,
david jencks
Cheer's
Fabien
On 3/24/07, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
yo,
I've been in touch with the folks at Geronimo.
They use dependency injection, and have a s
92 matches
Mail list logo
