On Nov 9, 2007, at 2:23 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
On Fri, 2007-11-09 at 20:16 +0000, Mark Thomas wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 15:17 +0100, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.15/
According to the release process, the 6.0.15 tag is:
[X] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] Stable
I am undecided about how to proceed with the release. The issues,
although visible, do not sound very serious in the real world,
so it
would seem to be possible to release as stable.
Just checking through the release, we still have a licensing
issue so
I
don't believe we can proceed with the tag as is. See
http://marc.info/?l=tomcat-dev&m=119170137616267&w=2 for details.
Remy - you commmitted the files originally so you are the only
one who
can
answer the question about their provenance. If the source was such
that the
Sun license can be removed, great. If not, we can use the CDDL
ones. I
am
happy to make the changes myself but I need to know which way to go.
These sources can be found in the specification documents.
That doesn't mean we can just copy them.
Geronimo
should also have the same files somewhere.
I believe they use the CDDL ones but I'll check. I'll prepare a
patch for
6.0.16 that uses whatever they use.
Geronimo has gone to a lot of trouble and subjected our users to
noticeable inconvenience to NOT ship any of the sun licensed xsds.
We have not found any authority or reasoning that would let us do
so. I believe the apache policy now allows us to put small numbers
of CDDL schemas in apache svn and ship them but AFAIK we have not yet
done so.
thanks
david jencks
Mark
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
