Chenjp commented on code in PR #751:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/751#discussion_r1758003371
##
java/org/apache/tomcat/util/http/FastHttpDateFormat.java:
##
@@ -104,8 +104,9 @@ public final class FastHttpDateFormat {
*/
public static String getCurrentDat
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69320
--- Comment #14 from Konstantin Kolinko ---
(In reply to elatllat from comment #10)
> (In reply to Mark Thomas from comment #6)
> > Release votes are announced on the dev list.
>
> I'm not seeing anything relevant:
>
> https://lists.apache.or
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69320
--- Comment #13 from Mark Thomas ---
I'm seeing something similar. Running the h2spec test suite seems to trigger
the bad state reliably. Next step is to use git bisect to figure out where the
problem was introduced. Once we know which commit i
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69320
--- Comment #12 from elatl...@gmail.com ---
I can trigger this issue just by reloading a page with ~40 assets.
I can not trigger it on a page with 5 assets.
Once the issue is triggered it manifests on pages with 5 assets (2 to 4 of 5
will fail)
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69320
--- Comment #11 from elatl...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 39866
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39866&action=edit
curl log
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
--
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69320
--- Comment #10 from elatl...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Mark Thomas from comment #6)
> Release votes are announced on the dev list.
I'm not seeing anything relevant:
https://lists.apache.org/list?dev@tomcat.apache.org:release%20candidate:
Pl
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69320
--- Comment #9 from Mark Thomas ---
The errors I am seeing on the rare occasions I am able to reproduce what I
think is this new error suggest an issue with header processing.
The stack trace in the attachment looks like the result of the clie
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69320
--- Comment #8 from EJ Egyed ---
I am experiencing an error I believe is related on 9.0.94. After reverting to
9.0.93 the error went away. I am not sure how to reproduce the error, but was
seeing errors written to the catalina log file. Attache
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69320
--- Comment #7 from EJ Egyed ---
Created attachment 39865
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39865&action=edit
Catalina log file
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
---
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69320
--- Comment #6 from Mark Thomas ---
Release votes are announced on the dev list.
It appears that this bug is harder to reproduce that it first appeared. I've
seen in - or something that might be it - with 10.1.x and 11.0.x but not 9.0.x
and I
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69320
--- Comment #5 from elatl...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Mark Thomas from comment #4)
> I'll note that bugs that get reported during the release vote nearly always
> result in the vote being cancelled, the bug being fixed and a new release
> vote
markt-asf commented on PR #753:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/753#issuecomment-2346801534
This approach could be implemented as a Filter. If we were going to do this,
I think something that enforces the limit at the point the parameters are
parsed - rather than after - is the w
On 12/09/2024 15:15, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
Hi,
This JEP has the potential to have a significant impact with Tomcat's
JNI use starting with Java 26.
https://openjdk.org/jeps/471
Unsafe.invokeCleaner will be removed, which will effectively prevent
using the direct ByteBuffers that are needed for
See BZ 69320. I've reproduced the issue on 10.1.x. Haven't tested other
versions yet or started to look for a root cause. That is next.
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands,
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69320
--- Comment #4 from Mark Thomas ---
I'll note that bugs that get reported during the release vote nearly always
result in the vote being cancelled, the bug being fixed and a new release vote.
To put it another way, test the release candidate du
markt-asf commented on code in PR #751:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/751#discussion_r1757204766
##
java/org/apache/tomcat/util/http/FastHttpDateFormat.java:
##
@@ -104,8 +104,9 @@ public final class FastHttpDateFormat {
*/
public static String getCurrent
Hi,
This JEP has the potential to have a significant impact with Tomcat's
JNI use starting with Java 26.
https://openjdk.org/jeps/471
Unsafe.invokeCleaner will be removed, which will effectively prevent
using the direct ByteBuffers that are needed for tomcat-native. The
solution is to use a memor
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
remm pushed a commit to branch 9.0.x
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/9.0.x by this push:
new f035e6a278 Tests the compatibility with rewrite from
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
remm pushed a commit to branch 10.1.x
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/10.1.x by this push:
new 6bb7babff4 Tests the compatibility with rewrite fr
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
remm pushed a commit to branch 11.0.x
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/11.0.x by this push:
new 904b6e79ed Tests the compatibility with rewrite fr
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
remm pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
commit 67dc904530a42aeaca0b5c6af3dbb6f61e68917a
Merge: eec1b2347a 98b4e8d35c
Author: Rémy Maucherat
AuthorDate: Thu Sep 12 15:38:11
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
remm pushed a change to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
from eec1b2347a Remove unused code
add 98b4e8d35c Tests the compatibility with rewrite from httpd for non
existent header
rmaucher merged PR #752:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/752
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.or
dsoumis opened a new pull request, #753:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/753
This is an effort of introducing Parameter Limit Valve to allow limiting the
number of parameters in HTTP requests, but explicitly allowing more parameters
for specific URLs.
It's worth to be note
n828cl commented on PR #752:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/752#issuecomment-2346272595
The new method testRewriteEmptyHeader() does not appear to be invoked from
anywhere. Is some of the change missing?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond t
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69320
--- Comment #3 from elatl...@gmail.com ---
Please let me know what "supporting information" I can share. This regression
is not happening in any other 10.x build.
The last log line is just
12-Sep-2024 08:46:35.076 INFO [main] org.apache.catali
PaulLodge opened a new pull request, #752:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/752
This test adds code coverage for CVE-2010-3718, I noticed it was missing
from the code coverage, the fix also contains a very small code refactor that
allows the test to work.
--
This is an automate
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69320
--- Comment #2 from elatl...@gmail.com ---
I sent an email to us...@infra.apache.org because commenting on this bug is
producing a bug (Too many connections at
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/perl5/5.34/DBI.pm line 691.)
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69320
--- Comment #1 from Chuck Caldarale ---
Without some useful supporting information, this will be closed as WORKSFORME.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69320
elatl...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P5
Severity|normal
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69320
Bug ID: 69320
Summary: ERR_HTTP2_PROTOCOL_ERROR
Product: Tomcat 10
Version: 10.1.29
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priori
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
remm pushed a commit to branch 10.1.x
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/10.1.x by this push:
new 730310c69b Remove unused code
730310c69b is descri
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
remm pushed a commit to branch 11.0.x
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/11.0.x by this push:
new e34c8f6b9b Remove unused code
e34c8f6b9b is descri
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
remm pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new eec1b2347a Remove unused code
eec1b2347a is described
Chenjp commented on code in PR #751:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/751#discussion_r1756465922
##
java/org/apache/tomcat/util/http/FastHttpDateFormat.java:
##
@@ -104,8 +104,9 @@ public final class FastHttpDateFormat {
*/
public static String getCurrentDat
markt-asf commented on code in PR #751:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/751#discussion_r1756307644
##
java/org/apache/tomcat/util/http/FastHttpDateFormat.java:
##
@@ -104,8 +104,9 @@ public final class FastHttpDateFormat {
*/
public static String getCurrent
36 matches
Mail list logo
