https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65179
--- Comment #3 from Mark Thomas ---
Yes, you will see a RST frame for the stream with error code 8 (cancel) to tell
the client no to bother sending (any more of) the requets body.
The 404 response is sent before the RST frame.
--
You are rec
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65181
Edin Hodzic changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|enhancement |major
Priority|P2
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65179
--- Comment #2 from Doug Whitfield ---
Hi Mark,
Regarding this fix, we still see an error code 8 and not the expected 404. Is
the error code 8 a separate bug? If so, is it logged somewhere I am not
finding? We have a jmx file we have been usin
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64710
--- Comment #21 from Doug Whitfield ---
Arshiya, I am trying to reproduce this issue using the provided application,
but changing the pom file to be Tomcat 9.0.17. The goal is to determine if we
can roll back to 9.0.17. The test application doe
michael-o commented on pull request #406:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/406#issuecomment-802077740
Note that Joe Orton is working in HTTPd to make this possible too A new set
of headers will contain certs in DER form encoded with Base 64.
--
This is an automated message from
michael-o edited a comment on pull request #406:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/406#issuecomment-802077740
Note that Joe Orton is working on HTTPd to make this possible too A new set
of headers will contain certs in DER form encoded with Base 64.
--
This is an automated messa
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64710
--- Comment #20 from Doug Whitfield ---
The earliest reference here is 9.0.36. Is there any reason to believe this
exists in any version before that? Thanks!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
--
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64621
--- Comment #10 from Doug Whitfield ---
Like 64671, I am curious if anyone knows if this was introduced any place
before 9.0.22. Thanks!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
---
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64671
--- Comment #8 from Doug Whitfield ---
Do we have any idea when this was introduced? The earliest reference I see is
9.0.22. Thanks!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
---
rmaucher commented on pull request #414:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/414#issuecomment-801922794
@rmannibucau That wasn't the case before that commit, but it's possible
after it. Personally, I would prefer dropping the reflection. Let's see if Mark
wants to comment on that.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65195
--- Comment #3 from Mark Thomas ---
Early to mid-April
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tom
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65195
--- Comment #2 from pentolone ---
Thanks, when will 9.0.45 be available?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: d
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65195
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65195
Bug ID: 65195
Summary: coyote http2 raise NullPointerException
Product: Tomcat 9
Version: 9.0.44
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
rmannibucau commented on pull request #414:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/414#issuecomment-801842654
@rmaucher due to the code structure I assumed it was intended for custom
loader to be able to benefit from the same configuration without having to
inherit from the default web
rmaucher commented on pull request #414:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/414#issuecomment-801817917
This was introduced by
https://github.com/apache/tomcat/commit/c38e9ccabc0d20e1f88b389ab531dcbf632b0ed8
and I understand the WebappLoader changes part of it.
In StandardCon
Excellent, thanks Martin!
On 17/03/2021 14:36, Martin Grigorov wrote:
Hi Rory,
Apache Tomcat's build and tests pass successfully with JDK 16 16+36-2231
and 17-ea+13-1000 on both Linux x86_64 and aarch64!
Regards,
Martin
On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 5:26 PM Rory O'Donnell
wrote:
Hi Mark,
*Relea
17 matches
Mail list logo