Author: rjung
Date: Thu Jun 21 06:59:29 2018
New Revision: 1833978
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1833978&view=rev
Log:
Fix permissions for ciphers.sh in binary
distribution (750 instead of 640).
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/build.xml
Modified: tomcat/trunk/build.xml
URL:
http://svn.apache
Turns out my issues were due to resources ending up in a sub-directory,
prefixed with java/org, like find out in sources. One aspect I would
like to see done if possible. Tomcat mixes a lot of stuff into the same
directories. Its layout and what not started before the normal java
conventions now su
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 9:45 PM Mark Thomas wrote:
> The proposed Apache Tomcat 9.0.10 release is now available for voting.
>
> Note:
> 9.0.9 was tagged and uploaded when BZ 62476 was created and the decision
> was taken to re-tag to pick up that fix.
>
> The major changes compared to the 9.0.8 r
The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.5.32 release is now available for voting.
The major changes compared to the 8.5.31 release are:
- Add the RemoteCIDRFilter and RemoteCIDRValve that can be used to
allow/deny requests based on IPv4 and/or IPv6 client address where the
IP ranges are defined using CI
Author: markt
Date: Wed Jun 20 20:26:39 2018
New Revision: 27597
Log:
Upload 8.5.32 for voting
Added:
dev/tomcat/tomcat-8/v8.5.32/
dev/tomcat/tomcat-8/v8.5.32/KEYS
dev/tomcat/tomcat-8/v8.5.32/README.html
dev/tomcat/tomcat-8/v8.5.32/RELEASE-NOTES
dev/tomcat/tomcat-8/v8.5.32/bin
Author: markt
Date: Wed Jun 20 19:47:34 2018
New Revision: 1833943
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1833943&view=rev
Log:
Tag 8.5.32
Added:
tomcat/tc8.5.x/tags/TOMCAT_8_5_32/ (props changed)
- copied from r1833942, tomcat/tc8.5.x/trunk/
Modified:
tomcat/tc8.5.x/tags/TOMCAT_8_
The proposed Apache Tomcat 9.0.10 release is now available for voting.
Note:
9.0.9 was tagged and uploaded when BZ 62476 was created and the decision
was taken to re-tag to pick up that fix.
The major changes compared to the 9.0.8 release are:
- Add the RemoteCIDRFilter and RemoteCIDRValve that
Author: markt
Date: Wed Jun 20 19:44:32 2018
New Revision: 1833940
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1833940&view=rev
Log:
Typo
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/webapps/docs/changelog.xml
Modified: tomcat/trunk/webapps/docs/changelog.xml
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/trunk/webapps/docs
Author: markt
Date: Wed Jun 20 19:42:35 2018
New Revision: 1833939
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1833939&view=rev
Log:
Update status
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/webapps/docs/changelog.xml
Modified: tomcat/trunk/webapps/docs/changelog.xml
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/trunk/web
Author: markt
Date: Wed Jun 20 19:40:51 2018
New Revision: 1833938
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1833938&view=rev
Log:
Fix typo
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/webapps/docs/changelog.xml
Modified: tomcat/trunk/webapps/docs/changelog.xml
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/trunk/webapps/
Author: markt
Date: Wed Jun 20 18:29:41 2018
New Revision: 27587
Log:
Upload 9.0.10 for voting
Added:
dev/tomcat/tomcat-9/v9.0.10/
dev/tomcat/tomcat-9/v9.0.10/KEYS
dev/tomcat/tomcat-9/v9.0.10/README.html
dev/tomcat/tomcat-9/v9.0.10/RELEASE-NOTES
dev/tomcat/tomcat-9/v9.0.10/bin
Author: markt
Date: Wed Jun 20 18:10:29 2018
New Revision: 1833932
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1833932&view=rev
Log:
Increment version for next development cycle
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/build.properties.default
tomcat/trunk/res/maven/mvn-pub.xml
tomcat/trunk/res/maven/mvn.pro
Author: markt
Date: Wed Jun 20 17:29:24 2018
New Revision: 1833930
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1833930&view=rev
Log:
Tag 9.0.10
Added:
tomcat/tags/TOMCAT_9_0_10/ (props changed)
- copied from r1833929, tomcat/trunk/
Modified:
tomcat/tags/TOMCAT_9_0_10/build.properties.de
The Buildbot has detected a restored build on builder tomcat-8-trunk while
building . Full details are available at:
https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomcat-8-trunk/builds/1350
Buildbot URL: https://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: silvanus_ubuntu
Build Reason: The AnyBranchScheduler
Github user markt-asf closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/115
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Github user markt-asf commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/115
Thanks for the PR. We have fixed this but with a simpler approach that
makes use of `ConcurrentDateFormat.formatRfc1123()`
---
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62476
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
Author: markt
Date: Wed Jun 20 15:03:50 2018
New Revision: 1833922
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1833922&view=rev
Log:
Fix https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62476
Use GMT timezone for the value of Expires header
Modified:
tomcat/tc7.0.x/trunk/ (props changed)
tomca
Author: markt
Date: Wed Jun 20 15:02:39 2018
New Revision: 1833921
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1833921&view=rev
Log:
Add specific RFC1123 support
Modified:
tomcat/tc7.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/util/ConcurrentDateFormat.java
Modified:
tomcat/tc7.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/c
Author: markt
Date: Wed Jun 20 14:54:23 2018
New Revision: 1833920
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1833920&view=rev
Log:
Fix https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62476
Use GMT timezone for the value of Expires header
Modified:
tomcat/tc8.0.x/trunk/ (props changed)
tomca
Author: markt
Date: Wed Jun 20 14:51:04 2018
New Revision: 1833919
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1833919&view=rev
Log:
Fix https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62476
Use GMT timezone for the value of Expires header
Modified:
tomcat/tc8.5.x/trunk/ (props changed)
tomca
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62476
--- Comment #2 from Konstantin Kolinko ---
It is a static constant. It is calculated only once.
Looking at references to RFC1123_DATE constant, I am more concerned of
"TimeZone.getTimeZone("GMT")" calls in Response#addDateHeader(),
#setDateHea
Author: markt
Date: Wed Jun 20 14:29:45 2018
New Revision: 1833918
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1833918&view=rev
Log:
Simplify
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/authenticator/AuthenticatorBase.java
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/authenticator/Authenti
Author: markt
Date: Wed Jun 20 14:11:15 2018
New Revision: 1833916
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1833916&view=rev
Log:
Increment version for next development cycle
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/build.properties.default
tomcat/trunk/res/maven/mvn-pub.xml
tomcat/trunk/res/maven/mvn.pro
Author: kkolinko
Date: Wed Jun 20 14:08:52 2018
New Revision: 1833915
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1833915&view=rev
Log:
Fix https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62476
Use GMT timezone for the value of Expires header
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/authentic
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62476
Michael Osipov <1983-01...@gmx.net> changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
--- Comment #
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62476
Bug ID: 62476
Summary: Expires header shall use GMT timezone
Product: Tomcat 9
Version: 9.0.8
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Author: markt
Date: Wed Jun 20 13:05:58 2018
New Revision: 1833913
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1833913&view=rev
Log:
Tag 9.0.9
Added:
tomcat/tags/TOMCAT_9_0_9/ (props changed)
- copied from r1833908, tomcat/trunk/
Modified:
tomcat/tags/TOMCAT_9_0_9/build.properties.defau
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62453
--- Comment #7 from Konstantin Kolinko ---
I think that the feature of JSP Tag files reported in this BZ ticket is rather
confusing. In my opinion, if I have a tag file that declares
<%@ attribute name="baz" %>
then evaluating "${baz}" shoul
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62453
--- Comment #6 from Mark Thomas ---
That typo is significant. With the typo fixed the performance difference is
4.6s vs ~50ms - two orders of magnitude difference. I think that probably
changes the balance.
Future additions to java.lang concer
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62453
--- Comment #5 from Rainer Jung ---
(In reply to Konstantin Kolinko from comment #4)
> (I wonder if it is possible to do a consistency check programmatically -
> similar to OpenSSL cipher suite tests that we have. The crucial thing is to
> get
Github user rainerjung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/115
@michael-o IMHO because an invalid header value will push most parsing code
to the error handling code path. And only by additional rules should that code
handle it like a valid header in the past
Author: markt
Date: Wed Jun 20 11:28:28 2018
New Revision: 1833907
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1833907&view=rev
Log:
Improve tracking of connection closure.
Modified:
tomcat/tc8.5.x/trunk/ (props changed)
tomcat/tc8.5.x/trunk/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/net/Nio2Endpoint.java
Author: markt
Date: Wed Jun 20 11:27:53 2018
New Revision: 1833906
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1833906&view=rev
Log:
Improve tracking of connection closure.
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/net/Nio2Endpoint.java
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/net/NioE
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62453
--- Comment #4 from Konstantin Kolinko ---
(In reply to Mark Thomas from comment #2)
> Created attachment 35975 [details]
> Patch for potential optimisation
> standardPackages.put("javax.jsp.servlet", servletJspClassNames);
A typo. The packag
Github user michael-o commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/115
@rainerjung My question simply was that if `Expires: 0` denotes a value in
the past (expired already), why should I explicitly use a valid header in the
past which requires more code to create as w
Github user rainerjung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/115
@michael-o APR_DATE_BAD: the date string was null, or unparsable or the
parsed date does not exist. A date in the past would not result in
APR_DATE_BAD. A timestamp before the unix epoch should be
Github user michael-o commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/115
Here is the reference commit:
https://github.com/apache/httpd/commit/60087a708b051c3c987b80abdfdc3f2e046ebc4d
@rainerjung How is `APR_DATE_BAD` defined? Unparsable? Or before Unix
epoch? I
Github user rainerjung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/115
Note that although the RFC demands to handle an invalid Expires header
(like Expires: 0) like one with a timestamp in the past, I coincidentally ran
into a problem yesterday, where the Apache web
39 matches
Mail list logo
