https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62453
--- Comment #6 from Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> --- That typo is significant. With the typo fixed the performance difference is 4.6s vs ~50ms - two orders of magnitude difference. I think that probably changes the balance. Future additions to java.lang concern me too. I took a quick look at automatic generation / tracking but opted for the manual version (from the Javadoc as it happens) for this patch. Given the performance improvement, some more thought on how to maintain this reliably is called for. The JAR file name could work - as long as rt.jar is in an expected location. I think the location is stable relative to JAVA_HOME. We'd still need to filter public / non-public classes but that should be easy enough. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
