To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project tomcat-tc7.0.x-test-bio has an issue affecting its community
integration.
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project tomcat-tc7.0.x-test-nio has an issue affecting its community
integration.
Author: violetagg
Date: Thu Nov 13 23:25:14 2014
New Revision: 1639550
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1639550
Log:
Update docs for Apache Tomcat 7.0.57 release.
[This commit notification would consist of 403 parts,
which exceeds the limit of 50 ones, so it was shortened to the summary.]
-
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57209
Bug ID: 57209
Summary: JNDIRealm userSearch does not work against active
directory with roles
Product: Tomcat 7
Version: 7.0.57
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
Author: violetagg
Date: Thu Nov 13 22:39:06 2014
New Revision: 7144
Log:
Remove 7.0.56
Removed:
release/tomcat/tomcat-7/v7.0.56/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: d
Author: violetagg
Date: Thu Nov 13 22:00:19 2014
New Revision: 1639537
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1639537
Log:
Updates (excluding docs) for 7.0.57 release
Modified:
tomcat/site/trunk/build.properties.default
tomcat/site/trunk/docs/doap_Tomcat.rdf
tomcat/site/trunk/docs/download-70.ht
Mark,
On 11/13/14 11:07 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 13/11/2014 16:01, Andrew Carr wrote:
>> Mark,
>>
>> I previously voted on the severity of this issue in bugzilla.
>>
>> You looking for verification of the fix and the vote here? Just trying to
>> clarify.
>>
>> +1 on 56780 fix
>
> Thanks.
>
>
Thank you Mark, I will test it.
Andrew
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 11:24 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 13/11/2014 16:06, Andrew Carr wrote:
> > I see, I guess, in the svn history where your comments are votes, and
> there
> > is +1 / -1 in the status.txt file. So I would have to be a committer to
>
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57208
Konstantin Kolinko changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
--- Comment #1 from Konst
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56780
--- Comment #13 from Konstantin Kolinko ---
Fixed in Tomcat 6 by r1639415. The fix will be in 6.0.43 onwards.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
Author: kkolinko
Date: Thu Nov 13 17:39:41 2014
New Revision: 1639415
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1639415
Log:
Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56780
Enable Tomcat to start when using a IBM JRE in strict SP800-131a mode
This back-ports the fix as well as some additional chang
2014-11-13 17:14 GMT+03:00 Christopher Schultz :
> Mark,
>
> On 11/12/14 10:15 AM, ma...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: markt
>> Date: Wed Nov 12 15:15:19 2014
>> New Revision: 1638812
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1638812
>> Log:
>> Back to 1.9.3 to avoid regression in tar support.
>
> It is wor
Author: kkolinko
Date: Thu Nov 13 17:24:39 2014
New Revision: 1639399
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1639399
Log:
Remove dependences that were used by removed bayeux module.
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/build.properties.default
Modified: tomcat/trunk/build.properties.default
URL:
http://svn.apache.o
Author: kkolinko
Date: Thu Nov 13 17:21:21 2014
New Revision: 1639397
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1639397
Log:
Rephrase, fix trailing whitespace as nagged by Checkstyle.
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/BUILDING.txt
Modified: tomcat/trunk/BUILDING.txt
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/trunk/BU
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57208
Bug ID: 57208
Summary: NullPointerException on JNDIRealm when search finds no
results - org.apache.catalina.realm.JNDIRealm
Product: Tomcat 7
Version: 7.0.57
Hardware
On 13/11/2014 16:06, Andrew Carr wrote:
> I see, I guess, in the svn history where your comments are votes, and there
> is +1 / -1 in the status.txt file. So I would have to be a committer to
> vote then?
You need to be a committer for your vote to be binding (and to record it
in the status file)
On 13/11/2014 16:08, Robert Sanders wrote:
> Will this include the latest Tomcat Native source as well?
http://svn.us.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/changelog.xml
Mark
>
> -Rob
>
>
> From: Mark Thomas [ma...@apache.org]
> Sent: T
Author: remm
Date: Thu Nov 13 16:11:28 2014
New Revision: 1639377
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1639377
Log:
Vote late
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt?rev=1639377&r1=1639376&r
Will this include the latest Tomcat Native source as well?
-Rob
From: Mark Thomas [ma...@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2014 11:07 AM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: Tomcat 6.0.x release
On 13/11/2014 16:01, Andrew Carr wrote:
> Mark,
>
I see, I guess, in the svn history where your comments are votes, and there
is +1 / -1 in the status.txt file. So I would have to be a committer to
vote then?
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 11:01 AM, Andrew Carr
wrote:
> Mark,
>
> I previously voted on the severity of this issue in bugzilla.
>
> You l
On 13/11/2014 16:01, Andrew Carr wrote:
> Mark,
>
> I previously voted on the severity of this issue in bugzilla.
>
> You looking for verification of the fix and the vote here? Just trying to
> clarify.
>
> +1 on 56780 fix
Thanks.
6.0.x uses RTC (Review-Then-Commit). Every proposed change is
Mark,
I previously voted on the severity of this issue in bugzilla.
You looking for verification of the fix and the vote here? Just trying to
clarify.
+1 on 56780 fix
Andrew
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 4:29 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We need one more vote for the fix for 56780 in 6.0.x.
>
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57142
--- Comment #7 from Arthur Fiedler ---
It seems that the clarification recommendation(per kchung on the JIRA link
mentioned in comment#5) is that EL is covered by the "scripting environment"
label in relation to the JSP page import attribut
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57190
--- Comment #4 from Christopher Schultz ---
I suppose that's the best we can do, but if the client has a session with an
older-than-latest-version of the /foo_b context, things might behave oddly.
Also, when the request-processing switches
Rémy,
On 11/12/14 8:19 AM, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
> 2014-11-12 12:49 GMT+01:00 :
>
>> +12. Consider wrapping the SocketWrapper with a facade to detect / prevent
>> +components retaining references longer than they should.
>>
> There are numerous problem detection facilities in Tomcat, which is
Mark,
On 11/12/14 10:15 AM, ma...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: markt
> Date: Wed Nov 12 15:15:19 2014
> New Revision: 1638812
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1638812
> Log:
> Back to 1.9.3 to avoid regression in tar support.
It is worth putting a version-check into build.xml that fails-fast with
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57206
Konstantin Kolinko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|-
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57038
Konstantin Kolinko changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||arunavat...@gmail.com
--- Com
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57206
Bug ID: 57206
Summary: Different result getting in tomcat 8.0.12 and 8.0.0
Product: Tomcat 8
Version: 8.0.12
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
Severity: blocker
Pr
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57199
--- Comment #2 from Andy Wilkinson ---
Thanks, Mark. In our case in the project with the compile problem when using
8.0.15 we had a test dependency on tomcat-embed-logging-juli so we weren't
seeing a problem with 8.0.14. Furthermore, in ano
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57190
--- Comment #3 from Mark Thomas ---
I think the correct behaviour here would be for getContext("/foo_b") to return
the latest version of foo_b, exactly as would happen if a user requested that
URL.
I like the idea of being able to specify
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57199
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
--- Comment #1 from Mark Thomas
Hi,
We need one more vote for the fix for 56780 in 6.0.x.
Once we have that vote I should be be able to find some time to tag and
roll the release. I'd like to get that done this week if possible since
I'm at ApacheCon EU next week.
Mark
-
33 matches
Mail list logo
