https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55078
--- Comment #2 from Timothy Stewart ---
This problem isn't quite what I thought. I have some other issue than the one
I described. The org.apache.tomcat.jdbc.pool.DataSourceFactory has code to
resolve the DataSource from JNDI, and set it
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55078
--- Comment #1 from Timothy Stewart ---
Created attachment 30407
--> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30407&action=edit
Possible fix
Replaced the TODO with a JNDI lookup and set the datasource on the
poolProperties be
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51813
--- Comment #9 from Christopher Schultz ---
(In reply to Rainer Jung from comment #8)
> (In reply to Christopher Schultz from comment #7)
> > Created attachment 30402 [details]
> > Patch against tcnative-1.1.x
> >
> > I'm not sure if I sho
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55078
Bug ID: 55078
Summary: Configuring a DataSource Resource with dataSourceJNDI
does not work as expected
Product: Tomcat 7
Version: trunk
Hardware: All
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55071
--- Comment #4 from bruce weertman ---
Thanks I've made the switch.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: d
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55071
--- Comment #3 from Christopher Schultz ---
While this is likely to be fixed, you should understand that JDBCRealm is not
appropriate for any real-world situation. Instead, you should use
DataSourceRealm, which is much more robust.
--
You
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51813
--- Comment #8 from Rainer Jung ---
(In reply to Christopher Schultz from comment #7)
> Created attachment 30402 [details]
> Patch against tcnative-1.1.x
>
> I'm not sure if I should be checking s->net or s->sock. They both seem to be
> se
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55071
--- Comment #2 from bruce weertman ---
I was wondering about that. I never do that on SELECT statements myself. After
I read that piece of code, I was thinking that perhaps I've been doing SQL
wrong for all these years!
Looking at
http://
Rainer,
On 6/6/13 4:54 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
> On 06.06.2013 19:56, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>> Rainer,
>>
>> On 6/6/13 1:32 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
>>> On 06.06.2013 18:22, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>
>>> Proposals mostly for the C files probably make sense in a STATUS file
>>> here if they a
On 07.06.2013 16:05, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> Rainer,
> In this particular case, it seems like my changes should be relatively
> compatible between the two. Should I patch trunk and back-port, patch
> 1.1 and forward-port, or patch 1.1 and ignore trunk (thus making the
> problem worse). I susp
On 06.06.2013 14:06, Mark Thomas wrote:
> The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.41 release is now available for voting.
>
> It can be obtained from:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-7/v7.0.41/
> The Maven staging repo is:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapach
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55073
Adrian Nistor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||PatchAvailable
CC|
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55073
Bug ID: 55073
Summary: wasted work in ValidateVisitor.isExpression()
Product: Tomcat 7
Version: 7.0.40
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55071
--- Comment #1 from Christopher Schultz ---
That commit() looks weird to me. COMMIT after SELECT?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
Rainer,
On 6/6/13 5:24 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
> On 06.06.2013 23:00, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
>>> From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
>>> Subject: Re: Where to put proposals for tcnative?
>>
>>> PS Here's what I get when trying to build tcnative-trunk:
>>
>>> $ sh b
Rainer,
On 6/6/13 5:06 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
> On 06.06.2013 22:54, Rainer Jung wrote:
>> On 06.06.2013 19:56, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>>> Rainer,
>>>
>>> On 6/6/13 1:32 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 06.06.2013 18:22, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>>
Proposals mostly for the C files probabl
Mark,
On 6.6.2013 14:06, Mark Thomas wrote:
The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.41 release is now available for voting.
It can be obtained from:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-7/v7.0.41/
The Maven staging repo is:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomc
17 matches
Mail list logo