Bug report for Tomcat Native [2013/03/10]

2013-03-09 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Tomcat Modules [2013/03/10]

2013-03-09 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Tomcat 7 [2013/03/10]

2013-03-09 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Tomcat 6 [2013/03/10]

2013-03-09 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Tomcat 8 [2013/03/10]

2013-03-09 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Tomcat Connectors [2013/03/10]

2013-03-09 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Taglibs [2013/03/10]

2013-03-09 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

[Bug 54660] AccessLogValve fileDateFormat can not be changed through JMX

2013-03-09 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54660 Arnaud Kleinveld changed: What|Removed |Added CC||arnaud.kleinv...@gmail.com --

[Bug 54660] New: AccessLogValve fileDateFormat can not be changed through JMX

2013-03-09 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54660 Bug ID: 54660 Summary: AccessLogValve fileDateFormat can not be changed through JMX Product: Tomcat 7 Version: 7.0.22 Hardware: PC OS: Linux

Re: Question on SERVLET_SPEC-57 (getSubmittedFileName)

2013-03-09 Thread Nick Williams
On Mar 9, 2013, at 4:57 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > Nick Williams wrote: > >> >> On Mar 9, 2013, at 3:49 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: >> >>> Renaming the method is fine. >>> >>> We don't change the API for the sake of it but if there is a need to >> then it is fine. >>> >>> Mark >> >> Look at you t

[Bug 54658] Implement Part#getSubmittedFileName from SERVLET_SPEC-57

2013-03-09 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54658 Nick Williams changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #30030|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug 54659] New: Echo Websocket Sample using Annotation API throws IllegalStateException

2013-03-09 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54659 Bug ID: 54659 Summary: Echo Websocket Sample using Annotation API throws IllegalStateException Product: Tomcat 8 Version: trunk Hardware: PC Status: NEW

Servlet 3.1 Request Upgrade

2013-03-09 Thread Nick Williams
Mark, I noticed the HttpServletRequest upgrade method still had the signature void upgrade(HttpUpgradeHandler) when it should be T upgrade(Class) per the latest spec. What's your status on getting this changed? I started to try to clean this up a bit (I can email you a partial patch that has

Re: Question on SERVLET_SPEC-57 (getSubmittedFileName)

2013-03-09 Thread Mark Thomas
Nick Williams wrote: > >On Mar 9, 2013, at 3:49 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > >> Renaming the method is fine. >> >> We don't change the API for the sake of it but if there is a need to >then it is fine. >> >> Mark > >Look at you top-posting. :-P :-) Sorry. Mobile client wasn't configured properly

Re: Question on SERVLET_SPEC-57 (getSubmittedFileName)

2013-03-09 Thread Konstantin Kolinko
2013/3/10 Nick Williams : > > On Mar 9, 2013, at 3:49 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > >> Renaming the method is fine. >> >> We don't change the API for the sake of it but if there is a need to then it >> is fine. >> >> Mark > > Look at you top-posting. :-P > > You replied just as I was. I deprecated getF

Re: Question on SERVLET_SPEC-57 (getSubmittedFileName)

2013-03-09 Thread Nick Williams
On Mar 9, 2013, at 3:49 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > Renaming the method is fine. > > We don't change the API for the sake of it but if there is a need to then it > is fine. > > Mark Look at you top-posting. :-P You replied just as I was. I deprecated getFilename and wrapped it around getSubmit

Re: Question on SERVLET_SPEC-57 (getSubmittedFileName)

2013-03-09 Thread Nick Williams
On Mar 9, 2013, at 3:15 PM, Nick Williams wrote: > I'm implementing the Part#getSubmittedFileName method introduced in > SERVLET_SPEC-57 [1]. > > o.a.c.core.ApplicationPart already has a getFilename method that accomplishes > this that is not part of the interface but IS public. This method is

Re: Question on SERVLET_SPEC-57 (getSubmittedFileName)

2013-03-09 Thread Mark Thomas
Renaming the method is fine. We don't change the API for the sake of it but if there is a need to then it is fine. Mark Nick Williams wrote: >I'm implementing the Part#getSubmittedFileName method introduced in >SERVLET_SPEC-57 [1]. > >o.a.c.core.ApplicationPart already has a getFilename metho

[Bug 54658] Implement Part#getSubmittedFileName from SERVLET_SPEC-57

2013-03-09 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54658 Nick Williams changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #30030|0 |1 is patch|

[Bug 54658] New: Implement Part#getSubmittedFileName from SERVLET_SPEC-57

2013-03-09 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54658 Bug ID: 54658 Summary: Implement Part#getSubmittedFileName from SERVLET_SPEC-57 Product: Tomcat 8 Version: trunk Hardware: All OS: All Sta

Question on SERVLET_SPEC-57 (getSubmittedFileName)

2013-03-09 Thread Nick Williams
I'm implementing the Part#getSubmittedFileName method introduced in SERVLET_SPEC-57 [1]. o.a.c.core.ApplicationPart already has a getFilename method that accomplishes this that is not part of the interface but IS public. This method is used only in o.a.c.connector.Request (once), but that's eas

buildbot failure in ASF Buildbot on tomcat-trunk

2013-03-09 Thread buildbot
The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder tomcat-trunk while building ASF Buildbot. Full details are available at: http://ci.apache.org/builders/tomcat-trunk/builds/4054 Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/ Buildslave for this Build: bb-vm_ubuntu Build Reason: scheduler Build Source St

svn commit: r1454758 - in /tomcat/trunk: java/org/apache/tomcat/websocket/ java/org/apache/tomcat/websocket/pojo/ java/org/apache/tomcat/websocket/server/ test/org/apache/tomcat/websocket/pojo/

2013-03-09 Thread markt
Author: markt Date: Sat Mar 9 19:14:18 2013 New Revision: 1454758 URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1454758 Log: Get encoding and decoding working end to end with an associated unit test Added: tomcat/trunk/test/org/apache/tomcat/websocket/pojo/ tomcat/trunk/test/org/apache/tomcat/websocket/p

[Tomcat Wiki] Trivial Update of "AngeliaSa" by AngeliaSa

2013-03-09 Thread Apache Wiki
Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Tomcat Wiki" for change notification. The "AngeliaSa" page has been changed by AngeliaSa: http://wiki.apache.org/tomcat/AngeliaSa New page: Hello and welcome. My name is Conrad Shippee though I don't really like being call

Re: WebSocket progress report

2013-03-09 Thread Mark Thomas
On 09/03/2013 15:29, Nick Williams wrote: > > On Mar 7, 2013, at 5:33 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > >> The current status of the WebSocket implementation is largely >> complete. >> >> The remaining TODOs are (in roughly the order I intend to tackle >> them): >> >> 1. Implement decoding 2. Figure out

Re: WebSocket progress report

2013-03-09 Thread Nick Williams
On Mar 7, 2013, at 5:33 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > The current status of the WebSocket implementation is largely complete. > > The remaining TODOs are (in roughly the order I intend to tackle them): > > 1. Implement decoding > 2. Figure out why there are failures in Autobahn with WSS and NIO and

Re: Tomcat7 EL error (proprietaryEvaluate)

2013-03-09 Thread Praveen Boppana
Ok, I'm new to this list, I will post it in users list. Thanks Praveen On Mar 9, 2013, at 5:14 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 08/03/2013 22:55, Praveen Boppana wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'm very new to tomcat7 environment, we are migrating from oc4j to tomcat7. >> We have an issue with EL in jsp pa

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 7.0.38

2013-03-09 Thread Rainer Jung
On 07.03.2013 23:47, Mark Thomas wrote: > The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.38 release is now available for voting. > > It can be obtained from: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-7/v7.0.38/ > The Maven staging repo is: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapach

Re: Tomcat7 EL error (proprietaryEvaluate)

2013-03-09 Thread Mark Thomas
On 08/03/2013 22:55, Praveen Boppana wrote: > Hi, > > I'm very new to tomcat7 environment, we are migrating from oc4j to tomcat7. > We have an issue with EL in jsp pages throwing error > "The method proprietaryEvaluate(String, Class, PageContext, null, boolean) > is undefined for the type PageCont