DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39309] tomcat can't compile big jsp, hitting a compiler limit

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39309 Madhu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] -

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 44382] Need to add support for HTTPOnly session cookie parameter

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44382 --- Comment #9 from Jim Manico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-07-24 18:47:23 PST --- Thank you for your support to see my HttpOnly session id patch get pushed into a future release of Tomcat. Several of the committers tell me that this patch

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41504] Illegal access: this web application instance has been stopped already

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41504 Gili <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --

Re: WARP development

On Thu, 24 Jul 2008 18:26:57 +0530, Henri Gomez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: So grab the tomcat-dev archives. To be short warp is a good protocol but ajp was more widely used. i have done some googling, but couldnt find anything specific. how do i search in the archives here ?? apart from t

Re: WARP development

> apart from the topic, can you/anyone tell me the "prerequisites for making a > connector of my own"...i mean what things should i be knowing ?? i dont > think i have sufficient knowledge to do this thing at present...but atleast > i can start making a knowledge-base to do so.. > thanks a lot. Yo

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 45419] Return Accept-Ranges from DefaultServlet

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45419 --- Comment #7 from Mike Bremford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-07-24 08:13:35 PST --- Yes, the Apache web server sets this header. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receivin

Re: WARP development

I'm curious - why do you think warp sounds 'better', or 'faster and more efficient' than AJP ? I don't remember any benchmark or major difference. And I think that was the main reason it was abandoned - it was just different, without 'better'. In fact there were even talks to abandon AJP - since it

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 45442] Thread.currentThread.getClassLoader() wrong when looking up Resources

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45442 --- Comment #3 from Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-07-24 06:17:29 PST --- I don't see why it would be mandatory to set the context CL simply to lookup "static" resources. This is done only for resolution through a URL (like jn

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 45419] Return Accept-Ranges from DefaultServlet

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45419 --- Comment #6 from Jess Holle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-07-24 07:50:18 PST --- I'm guessing the Apache web server supports this just fine. If so, then that's both a workaround and a reason to improve Tomcat. Tomcat should strive to be

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 45419] Return Accept-Ranges from DefaultServlet

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45419 --- Comment #5 from Mike Bremford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-07-24 07:08:05 PST --- The Adobe client will request the entire document, but if it finds it's Linearized and the server accepts Ranges it will interrupt that initial request.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 45419] Return Accept-Ranges from DefaultServlet

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45419 --- Comment #3 from Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-07-24 06:34:02 PST --- I think this is a design flaw of the Adobe client. There are plenty of servlets, so adding this to the default servlet is pointless, as it might not be

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 45419] Return Accept-Ranges from DefaultServlet

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45419 --- Comment #4 from Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-07-24 06:34:40 PST --- I think this is a design flaw of the Adobe client. There are plenty of servlets, so adding this to the default servlet is pointless, as it might not be

Re: WARP development

So grab the tomcat-dev archives. To be short warp is a good protocol but ajp was more widely used. 2008/7/24 Deepak Mishra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > sir please !!! i am fond of listening looong stories...if you feel tired, > perhaps you can provide me a link, would you?? please...please.. > > On Thu

Re: WARP development

sir please !!! i am fond of listening looong stories...if you feel tired, perhaps you can provide me a link, would you?? please...please.. On Thu, 24 Jul 2008 17:22:33 +0530, Henri Gomez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: a long long story :-) 2008/7/24 Deepak Mishra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: mod_web

Re: [VOTE] bayeux inclusion

[X] +1 include it as an independent component, I'm interested - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: WARP development

a long long story :-) 2008/7/24 Deepak Mishra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> mod_webapp is not supported since years that is why. >> >> Cheers >> >> Jean-Frederic >> > > this is what i want to ask...WHY is mod_webapp not being worked upon,when > WARP sounds better than AJP ? > > -

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.18

On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 8:23 AM, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The candidates binaries are available here: > http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.18/ > > According to the release process, the 6.0.18 tag is: > [ ] Broken > [ ] Alpha > [ ] Beta > [ X ] Stable Yoav

Re: WARP development

mod_webapp is not supported since years that is why. Cheers Jean-Frederic this is what i want to ask...WHY is mod_webapp not being worked upon,when WARP sounds better than AJP ? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: WARP development

Deepak Mishra wrote: hello. pardon me as a newbie if these comments seem to be awkward... i searched the archives, but failed to find any such thing with reference to tomcat6. what i have read till now, i feel WARP to be more faster and efficient than AJP (maybe the book authors were biased !!)