I'm curious - why do you think warp sounds 'better', or 'faster and more efficient' than AJP ? I don't remember any benchmark or major difference. And I think that was the main reason it was abandoned - it was just different, without 'better'. In fact there were even talks to abandon AJP - since it's not so much 'better' than plain HTTP.
If you want to play with connectors - you may want to take a look at the recently opensourced protocol buffers, it will save you the time writing the marshalling and they're very efficient and flexible. I would enthusiastically support such a connector :-) The only reason I can see to still have a non-http connector is to allow 'out of band' management operations and enable other RPC-style communication, and for that you would need a more generic marshaling than AJP. Costin On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 6:24 AM, Deepak Mishra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 24 Jul 2008 18:26:57 +0530, Henri Gomez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > So grab the tomcat-dev archives. >> >> To be short warp is a good protocol but ajp was more widely used. >> > > i have done some googling, but couldnt find anything specific. > how do i search in the archives here ?? > > > apart from the topic, can you/anyone tell me the "prerequisites for making > a connector of my own"...i mean what things should i be knowing ?? i dont > think i have sufficient knowledge to do this thing at present...but atleast > i can start making a knowledge-base to do so.. > thanks a lot. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
