svn commit: r677507 - in /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk: STATUS.txt build.properties.default build.xml dist.xml res/tomcat.nsi

2008-07-16 Thread mturk
Author: mturk Date: Wed Jul 16 23:14:31 2008 New Revision: 677507 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=677507&view=rev Log: Backport r676510 from trunk. Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/build.properties.default tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/build.xml tomcat/t

Re: Feedback for Bayeux contribution

2008-07-16 Thread Costin Manolache
BTW - any docs associated with this ? For example, what's the relation with JMS and other products/APIs ? Briefly looking at the code - it would be nice to include javadocs at least on the public APIs, and some indication of which are the public / frozen APIs and which are just impl methods that sh

Re: Feedback for Bayeux contribution

2008-07-16 Thread Costin Manolache
I think this is a nice contribution ( haven't reviewed the code in detail yet ), but seems like a separate enough feature to be distributed as a separate/optional package. I can't think of any good reason to include it in the base tomcat distro ( except that a lot of other stuff is there and should

Feedback for Bayeux contribution

2008-07-16 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
I'd like some feedback on the contribution, before I call for a vote for inclusion thanks Filip [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45413 Summary: Contribution of Bayeux implementation for Tomcat Product: Tomcat 6 Versio

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 45413] New: Contribution of Bayeux implementation for Tomcat

2008-07-16 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45413 Summary: Contribution of Bayeux implementation for Tomcat Product: Tomcat 6 Version: 6.0.16 Platform: All URL: http://svn.hanik.com/svn/repos/tomcat-bayeux OS/Version: All

svn commit: r677475 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt

2008-07-16 Thread fhanik
Author: fhanik Date: Wed Jul 16 17:16:50 2008 New Revision: 677475 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=677475&view=rev Log: fix some comet stuff proposal Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/tr

svn commit: r677474 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt

2008-07-16 Thread fhanik
Author: fhanik Date: Wed Jul 16 17:14:29 2008 New Revision: 677474 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=677474&view=rev Log: votes Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt?rev=67747

svn commit: r677473 - in /tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/connector: CoyoteAdapter.java Request.java

2008-07-16 Thread fhanik
Author: fhanik Date: Wed Jul 16 17:13:37 2008 New Revision: 677473 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=677473&view=rev Log: first chunk - make sure END gets called properly, if the event was closed second chunk - if the POST body is x-www-form-urlencoded, request.getAvailable() returns 0 for Id

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 45412] New: Mod-Jk 1.2.26 AND Aapche 2. 2 not releasing connections quickly to backend Jboss 4.2 release

2008-07-16 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45412 Summary: Mod-Jk 1.2.26 AND Aapche 2.2 not releasing connections quickly to backend Jboss 4.2 release Product: Tomcat 6 Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: Li

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.17

2008-07-16 Thread Rainer Jung
Remy Maucherat schrieb: The candidates binaries are available here: http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.17/ According to the release process, the 6.0.17 tag is: [ ] Broken [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta [ ] Stable No final vote from my side, but a first test: if the shell scripts are used (Linux

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 45406] Decoding URI encoded in UTF-16 does not work correctly.

2008-07-16 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45406 --- Comment #8 from Julian Reschke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-07-16 08:12:02 PST --- I do(In reply to comment #6) > If we are to accept UTC-16, let's examine the bytestream of a GET request; > > GET > \0h\0t\0t\0p\0:\0/\0/\0a\0.\0c\0o\0

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 45406] Decoding URI encoded in UTF-16 does not work correctly.

2008-07-16 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45406 --- Comment #7 from Ran Rubinstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-07-16 08:09:21 PST --- (In reply to comment #6) I was under the impression that only URL parameters that are part of the query string have to be encoded, and that when decodi

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 45406] Decoding URI encoded in UTF-16 does not work correctly.

2008-07-16 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45406 --- Comment #6 from Will Rowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-07-16 07:58:51 PST --- If we are to accept UTC-16, let's examine the bytestream of a GET request; GET \0h\0t\0t\0p\0:\0/\0/\0a\0.\0c\0o\0m\0?\0u\0t\0f\0001\0006\0p\0a\0r\0a\0m\0e\0

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 45406] Decoding URI encoded in UTF-16 does not work correctly.

2008-07-16 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45406 Julian Reschke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECT

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 45406] Decoding URI encoded in UTF-16 does not work correctly.

2008-07-16 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45406 --- Comment #5 from Julian Reschke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-07-16 07:32:26 PST --- (In reply to comment #3) > Marking Invalid. > > You aren't able to use utf-16 or ucs-2. Period. > > The RFC2616 protocol clearly declares the input s

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 45406] Decoding URI encoded in UTF-16 does not work correctly.

2008-07-16 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45406 --- Comment #4 from Ran Rubinstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-07-16 06:57:15 PST --- (In reply to comment #3) > Marking Invalid. > > You aren't able to use utf-16 or ucs-2. Period. > > The RFC2616 protocol clearly declares the input s

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 45406] Decoding URI encoded in UTF-16 does not work correctly.

2008-07-16 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45406 Will Rowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED R

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 45406] Decoding URI encoded in UTF-16 does not work correctly.

2008-07-16 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45406 --- Comment #2 from Ran Rubinstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-07-16 06:20:16 PST --- (In reply to comment #1) > If you are literally correct below in your observation, the request should > return 400 invalid, because %D%7 is not valid.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 45406] Decoding URI encoded in UTF-16 does not work correctly.

2008-07-16 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45406 --- Comment #1 from Will Rowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-07-16 06:14:40 PST --- If you are literally correct below in your observation, the request should return 400 invalid, because %D%7 is not valid. 2 hex digits are mandatory. -- C

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 45406] New: Decoding URI encoded in UTF-16 does not work correctly.

2008-07-16 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45406 Summary: Decoding URI encoded in UTF-16 does not work correctly. Product: Tomcat 6 Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal