What's the current status of commons-logging versus juli/logging ? Do
we still need the dep ?
Speaking of deps - I'm completely confused by tomcat-dbcp.jar - it
seems to break the build ( 'download' ) with JDK1.6, yet I can't find
any usage in the code - and just removing it doesn't seem to hurt i
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44494
--- Comment #16 from Suzuki Yuichiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-03-20 19:57:35
PST ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> Not bad, but I have some problem believing that no longer using bb.getLength()
> as the value for limit (or not using Int
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44494
--- Comment #15 from Suzuki Yuichiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-03-20 18:26:37
PST ---
Remy and Filip, thank you for immediate checks.
Yes, the logic is same in all of them.
(In reply to comment #11, #12)
> I tested the patch on 5.5 a
when the commons-logging jar files got updated, they also got renamed,
we missed a few spots,
some files in bin and conf still reference the old name, like
catalina.policy
// These permissions apply to the commons-logging API
grant codeBase "file:${catalina.home}/bin/commons-logging-api.jar" {
Author: remm
Date: Thu Mar 20 11:15:39 2008
New Revision: 639393
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=639393&view=rev
Log:
- Explanation.
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt?re
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39396
--- Comment #4 from Aleksander Adamowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-03-20
10:28:11 PST ---
Julian Reschke wrote:
>The Allow header should contain those methods for which the server would not
>return 405 (Not Allowed).
>
>Thus, if it ret
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44646
Summary: IllegalStateException when using
CometConnectionManagerValve
Product: Tomcat 6
Version: 6.0.16
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status: NEW
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39396
Julian Reschke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECT
This patch has been committed as bug 44645.
-- Seth
Mark Thomas wrote:
Seth Leger wrote:
Hi devs,
I've added support to the JNDIRealm so that a custom
javax.net.SocketFactory can be specified for the JNDI connection.
This is necessary so that you can perform customized SSL negotiation
on
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44645
Summary: [Patch] JNDIRealm - Doesn't support JNDI
"java.naming.ldap.factory.socket" parameter
Product: Tomcat 6
Version: 6.0.16
Platform: PC
URL: http://java.sun.c
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22948
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19444
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comme
On Wed, 2008-03-19 at 18:17 -0600, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> Remy Maucherat wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-03-19 at 22:43 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> >>+1 : remm, markt
> >> - -1 : fhanik - I tried this patch, and it doesn't work, it hangs. I also
> >> saw the bug report, informi
Author: markt
Date: Thu Mar 20 01:22:20 2008
New Revision: 639199
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=639199&view=rev
Log:
Propose removing reference to the admin app
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomc
Author: markt
Date: Thu Mar 20 01:20:05 2008
New Revision: 639198
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=639198&view=rev
Log:
There is no admin app in 6.x
Removed:
tomcat/trunk/webapps/ROOT/admin/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [
15 matches
Mail list logo
