https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44494
--- Comment #15 from Suzuki Yuichiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-03-20 18:26:37 PST --- Remy and Filip, thank you for immediate checks. Yes, the logic is same in all of them. (In reply to comment #11, #12) > I tested the patch on 5.5 and it didn't work, I will look deeper into it > I also tested the trunk patch, and couldn't get it to work properly I'm sorry, I might have made a mistake in something. I will check them more. (In reply to comment #14) > if we are streaming a few megabytes of data, tomcat would have to cache all > that data in order to support mark properly. If it says more in detail, Tomcat would have to cache data only after the mark() method calling, and Tomcat would have to cache characters up to only the size that the application specified with the method. Of course, we can choose to support these methods or not to support. I think it's wonderful if Tomcat can support that. And I'm believing that the implementation of Tomcat has enough possibility. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
