Re: Mavenization (M10N) of Tomcat Build Process - Should Tomcat Be Migrated to Maven 2?

I'm pretty much going to agree with Costin on this one. I have no objection to having a maven build as an alternative to the ant build (assuming that it can do the same thing, which I don't really believe without seeing the pom). But most mavenized projects that I have see (e.g. apache-commons)

Re: Mavenization (M10N) of Tomcat Build Process - Should Tomcat Be Migrated to Maven 2?

Hi guys, i have been a passive listener all the while but i feel its time for change. I vote for Maven regards, Mary >>> Peter Rossbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 10/18/07 11:08 AM >>> Yes! I can't see that maven build is better choice. Peter Vote -1 for build with maven! Am 18.10.2007 um 00

svn commit: r585877 - /tomcat/connectors/trunk/jni/native/os/win32/libtcnative.rc

Author: mturk Date: Wed Oct 17 22:56:42 2007 New Revision: 585877 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=585877&view=rev Log: Fix compilation. Properly quote the strings Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/jni/native/os/win32/libtcnative.rc Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/jni/native/os/win32/

svn commit: r585876 - /tomcat/connectors/trunk/jni/native/os/win32/libtcnative.rc

Author: mturk Date: Wed Oct 17 22:50:50 2007 New Revision: 585876 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=585876&view=rev Log: Fix compilation. Add missing backslash Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/jni/native/os/win32/libtcnative.rc Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/jni/native/os/win32/libtc

Re: Mavenization (M10N) of Tomcat Build Process - Should Tomcat Be Migrated to Maven 2?

Yes! I can't see that maven build is better choice. Peter Vote -1 for build with maven! Am 18.10.2007 um 00:45 schrieb Mark Thomas: Paul Shemansky wrote: Key features that may be useful to us are : - The Standard Directory Layout - Specifically, multi-module builds. This might make manag

svn commit: r585875 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS

Author: pero Date: Wed Oct 17 22:41:23 2007 New Revision: 585875 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=585875&view=rev Log: add my vote Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS?rev=585875&r1=585

Re: Mavenization (M10N) of Tomcat Build Process - Should Tomcat Be Migrated to Maven 2?

Hi, Paul! Just a suggestion how to start (seeing all the opinions around): You may start playing in some sandbox, creating a directory structure there, and pulling branches of tomcat code through the use of svn:externals property. It is called creating a view. Having done that, it will be more e

Re: Mavenization (M10N) of Tomcat Build Process - Should Tomcat Be Migrated to Maven 2?

Paul Shemansky wrote: > Key features that may be useful to us are : > > - The Standard Directory Layout - Specifically, multi-module builds. > This might make managing individual components easier for catalina, > coyote, naming, jsp/servlet api/implementation, connector, etc. "might" isn't a comp

Re: Mavenization (M10N) of Tomcat Build Process - Should Tomcat Be Migrated to Maven 2?

On 10/17/07, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We currently have a "distribute to Maven repo" in place. > The most current version is in the sandbox, that would allow us to > publish to the central ASF repo with signed JAR's. > This allows(will allow) other projects that do use

Re: Mavenization (M10N) of Tomcat Build Process - Should Tomcat Be Migrated to Maven 2?

-1 as well on switching to maven as default ( or back to many source tree 'modules' ). But if you want to create a maven build file ( or a Makefile, or eclipse/netbeans projects, etc :-) that builds tomcat - I personally don't see a problem with that - as long as it doesn't require moving code aro

Re: Mavenization (M10N) of Tomcat Build Process - Should Tomcat Be Migrated to Maven 2?

lemme give you my feedback and some history Paul Shemansky wrote: Dear Fellow Tomcat Developers, As you may have already noticed, I recently joined the ASF and the Tomcat Developer's List. I have been a Maven 2 user since 2005, and I previously used Ant for all of my projects. I suffered thro

Re: Mavenization (M10N) of Tomcat Build Process - Should Tomcat Be Migrated to Maven 2?

Rémy Maucherat wrote: On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 16:21 -0400, Paul Shemansky wrote: It is not my intention to start a flame war between Ant and Maven users, but merely to propose Maven 2 to this group, and respectfully use this thread to discuss the advantages and disadvantages of switching Tomcat

Re: Mavenization (M10N) of Tomcat Build Process - Should Tomcat Be Migrated to Maven 2?

On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 16:21 -0400, Paul Shemansky wrote: > It is not my intention to start a flame war between Ant and Maven > users, but merely to propose Maven 2 to this group, and respectfully > use this thread to discuss the advantages and disadvantages of > switching Tomcat's build process wit

svn commit: r585708 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS

Author: fhanik Date: Wed Oct 17 14:39:15 2007 New Revision: 585708 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=585708&view=rev Log: proposed fix Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS?rev=585708&r1=

svn commit: r585707 - /tomcat/sandbox/gdev6x/java/org/apache/catalina/startup/ConnectorCreateRule.java

Author: fhanik Date: Wed Oct 17 14:38:24 2007 New Revision: 585707 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=585707&view=rev Log: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43643 Modified: tomcat/sandbox/gdev6x/java/org/apache/catalina/startup/ConnectorCreateRule.java Modified: tomcat/s

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43643] - Setting the executor attribute in a connector that does not support the executor attribute causes a

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Mavenization (M10N) of Tomcat Build Process - Should Tomcat Be Migrated to Maven 2?

Dear Fellow Tomcat Developers, As you may have already noticed, I recently joined the ASF and the Tomcat Developer's List. I have been a Maven 2 user since 2005, and I previously used Ant for all of my projects. I suffered through many hardships migrating from Ant to Maven, but in my humble opin

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43641] - Using the bind attribute for Membership tag causes Multicast to break

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

svn commit: r585616 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS

Author: pero Date: Wed Oct 17 11:14:09 2007 New Revision: 585616 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=585616&view=rev Log: add my vote Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS?rev=585616&r1=585

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43641] - Using the bind attribute for Membership tag causes Multicast to break

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

svn commit: r585610 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS

Author: fhanik Date: Wed Oct 17 11:00:23 2007 New Revision: 585610 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=585610&view=rev Log: proposed bug fix Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS?rev=585610

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43641] - Using the bind attribute for Membership tag causes Multicast to break

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

svn commit: r585606 - in /tomcat/sandbox/gdev6x: build.properties.default java/org/apache/catalina/core/StandardServer.java

Author: fhanik Date: Wed Oct 17 10:54:15 2007 New Revision: 585606 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=585606&view=rev Log: Forward port from 6.0 Modified: tomcat/sandbox/gdev6x/build.properties.default tomcat/sandbox/gdev6x/java/org/apache/catalina/core/StandardServer.java Modified:

svn commit: r585604 - in /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk: STATUS java/org/apache/coyote/http11/Http11NioProtocol.java

Author: fhanik Date: Wed Oct 17 10:51:44 2007 New Revision: 585604 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=585604&view=rev Log: Fix property setter for keystore type Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/coyote/http11/Http11NioProtocol.java Modified: to

Re: Tomcat6 BUILDING.txt misunderstood?

On 10/17/07, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Paul Shemansky wrote: > > My Fellow Code Monkeys, . > > My first day here, I noticed that we > > are downloading DBCP source files and compiling them with the Tomcat build. > > In my humble opinion, I think it would be nice to ju

svn commit: r585542 - /tomcat/sandbox/gdev6x/java/org/apache/coyote/http11/Http11NioProtocol.java

Author: fhanik Date: Wed Oct 17 08:42:52 2007 New Revision: 585542 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=585542&view=rev Log: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43634 Modified: tomcat/sandbox/gdev6x/java/org/apache/coyote/http11/Http11NioProtocol.java Modified: tomcat/sandbox

svn commit: r585541 - /tomcat/sandbox/gdev6x/java/org/apache/catalina/core/StandardThreadExecutor.java

Author: fhanik Date: Wed Oct 17 08:41:20 2007 New Revision: 585541 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=585541&view=rev Log: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43642 Modified: tomcat/sandbox/gdev6x/java/org/apache/catalina/core/StandardThreadExecutor.java Modified: tomcat/s

svn commit: r585538 - /tomcat/sandbox/gdev6x/java/org/apache/catalina/tribes/membership/McastServiceImpl.java

Author: fhanik Date: Wed Oct 17 08:34:53 2007 New Revision: 585538 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=585538&view=rev Log: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43641 Modified: tomcat/sandbox/gdev6x/java/org/apache/catalina/tribes/membership/McastServiceImpl.java Modified: t

Re: Tomcat6 BUILDING.txt misunderstood?

Paul Shemansky wrote: My Fellow Code Monkeys, You may have noticed I recommended for a push to change the build to a Maven 2 structure. Before starting a Mavenization discussion thread, I wanted to investigate the entire build process. My first day here, I noticed that we are downloading DBCP

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43643] - Setting the executor attribute in a connector that does not support the executor attribute causes a

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43643] New: - Setting the executor attribute in a connector that does not support the executor attribute causes a

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43642] New: - Add prestartminSpareThreads attribute for Executor

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43642] - Add prestartminSpareThreads attribute for Executor

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43641] - Using the bind attribute for Membership tag causes Multicast to break

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43641] New: - Using the bind attribute for Membership tag causes Multicast to break

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: svn commit: r585313 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS

Rainer Jung wrote: > jean-frederic clere wrote: >> Rémy Maucherat wrote: >>> On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 07:28 -0400, Tim Funk wrote: There was a request in bugzilla to pass in a new env variable called JAVA_EXE (or similar). Could that be an acceptable alternative? Then it would make

Re: svn commit: r585313 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS

jean-frederic clere wrote: Rémy Maucherat wrote: On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 07:28 -0400, Tim Funk wrote: There was a request in bugzilla to pass in a new env variable called JAVA_EXE (or similar). Could that be an acceptable alternative? Then it would make the bug submitter happy since he can sym

Re: Tomcat6 BUILDING.txt misunderstood?

My Fellow Code Monkeys, You may have noticed I recommended for a push to change the build to a Maven 2 structure. Before starting a Mavenization discussion thread, I wanted to investigate the entire build process. My first day here, I noticed that we are downloading DBCP source files and compili

Re: svn commit: r585313 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS

Rémy Maucherat wrote: > On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 07:28 -0400, Tim Funk wrote: >> There was a request in bugzilla to pass in a new env variable called >> JAVA_EXE (or similar). >> >> Could that be an acceptable alternative? Then it would make the bug >> submitter happy since he can symlink my_program

Re: Tomcat6 BUILDING.txt misunderstood?

On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 08:41 -0400, Yoav Shapira wrote: > Hi DI, > > On 10/17/07, DI Roman Fiedler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > If misunderstood: Change line to > >Download a Java Development Kit (JDK) release (version 1.5.x) from: > > > > If error: > > search for it? > > It's an error: th

Re: Tomcat6 BUILDING.txt misunderstood?

Yoav Shapira wrote: Hi DI, On 10/17/07, DI Roman Fiedler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: If misunderstood: Change line to Download a Java Development Kit (JDK) release (version 1.5.x) from: If error: search for it? It's an error: the build is intended to work with Java 1.5 and later,

svn commit: r585465 - in /tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk: jkstatus/src/share/org/apache/jk/status/JkStatusUpdateLoadbalancerTask.java jkstatus/src/share/org/apache/jk/status/JkStatusUpdateTask.java xdocs/

Author: pero Date: Wed Oct 17 05:42:28 2007 New Revision: 585465 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=585465&view=rev Log: Fix correct parameter validation at JkStatusUpdateTask and JkStatusUpdateLoadbalancerTask ant tasks. Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/jkstatus/src/share/org/apache

Re: Tomcat6 BUILDING.txt misunderstood?

Hi DI, On 10/17/07, DI Roman Fiedler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If misunderstood: Change line to >Download a Java Development Kit (JDK) release (version 1.5.x) from: > > If error: > search for it? It's an error: the build is intended to work with Java 1.5 and later, including Java 1.6, bu

Tomcat6 BUILDING.txt misunderstood?

Hi List, tomcat6 Building.txt says: * Download a Java Development Kit (JDK) release (version 1.5.x or later) from: http://java.sun.com/j2se/ I tried it with 1.6 (which is later than 1.5.x) and it failed. With 1.5 it worked. Did I misunderstand the line or should 1.6 have worked also? I

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43530] - Bad links on Apache Tomcat 6.0 Documentation Index

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: svn commit: r585313 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS

On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 07:28 -0400, Tim Funk wrote: > There was a request in bugzilla to pass in a new env variable called > JAVA_EXE (or similar). > > Could that be an acceptable alternative? Then it would make the bug > submitter happy since he can symlink my_program_that_i_can_see_in_ps to >

Re: svn commit: r585313 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS

+1 for that env variable, but also autodetection must be implemented Peter Am 17.10.2007 um 13:28 schrieb Tim Funk: There was a request in bugzilla to pass in a new env variable called JAVA_EXE (or similar). Could that be an acceptable alternative? Then it would make the bug submitter h

Re: svn commit: r585313 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS

There was a request in bugzilla to pass in a new env variable called JAVA_EXE (or similar). Could that be an acceptable alternative? Then it would make the bug submitter happy since he can symlink my_program_that_i_can_see_in_ps to java. -Tim Rémy Maucherat wrote: On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 05:

Re: svn commit: r585313 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS

Hi Remy, but is'nt /usr/lib/java the correct value to JRE_HOME ? Regards Peter Am 17.10.2007 um 13:10 schrieb Rémy Maucherat: On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 05:47 +0200, Peter Rossbach wrote: Hi Remy, I think the patch is incomplete this line seem not correct: +else + JRE_HOME=/usr +

Re: svn commit: r585313 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS

On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 05:47 +0200, Peter Rossbach wrote: > Hi Remy, > > I think the patch is incomplete > > this line seem not correct: > > +else > + JRE_HOME=/usr > +fi > > better > +else > + JRE_HOME=/usr/bin/java > +fi The path to the Java executable is $JRE_HOME/b