Bug report for Watchdog [2007/10/14]

2007-10-14 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Tomcat 5 [2007/10/14]

2007-10-14 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Tomcat 3 [2007/10/14]

2007-10-14 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Tomcat 4 [2007/10/14]

2007-10-14 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

svn commit: r584647 - /tomcat/current/tc5.5.x/STATUS

2007-10-14 Thread billbarker
Author: billbarker Date: Sun Oct 14 17:29:28 2007 New Revision: 584647 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=584647&view=rev Log: Add patch for NIO/AJP and vote Modified: tomcat/current/tc5.5.x/STATUS Modified: tomcat/current/tc5.5.x/STATUS URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/current/t

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43621] - soTimeout not worked on channelNioSocket

2007-10-14 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43621] - soTimeout not worked on channelNioSocket

2007-10-14 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43621] New: - soTimeout not worked on channelNioSocket

2007-10-14 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

JSR-245 JavaServer Pages 2.1 standard

2007-10-14 Thread Lucas Galfaso
Hi, I am reading the JSP 2.1 specification and I have a question on how inconsistencies should be read. I was going to ask the users group (and I will if you think is best) but given that you are implementing this standard, I think that you might be in a better position to answer this. "JSP.5.15

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42565] - jsp /expression language ternary expression without space before colon stopped working

2007-10-14 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42565] - jsp /expression language ternary expression without space before colon stopped working

2007-10-14 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu