Hi, I am reading the JSP 2.1 specification and I have a question on how inconsistencies should be read. I was going to ask the users group (and I will if you think is best) but given that you are implementing this standard, I think that you might be in a better position to answer this.
"JSP.5.15 <jsp:text>" reads ... No subelements may appear within jsp:text; for example the following fragment is invalid and must generate a translation error. ... The jsp:text action has no attributes. The action may have a body. The body may not have nested actions nor scripting elements. ... "JSP.5.11 <jsp:body>" reads Normally, the body of a standard or custom action invocation is defined implicitly as the body of the XML element used to represent the invocation. The body of a standard or custom action can also be defined explicitly using the <jsp:body> standard action. This is required if one or more <jsp:attribute> elements appear in the body of the tag. If one or more <jsp:attribute> elements appear in the body of a tag invocation but no <jsp:body> element appears or an empty <jsp:body> element appears, it is the equivalent of the tag having an empty body. It is also legal to use the <jsp:body> standard action to supply bodies to standard actions, for any standard action that accepts a body (except for <jsp:invoke>, <jsp:body>, <jsp:attribute>, <jsp:scriptlet>, <jsp:expression>, and <jsp:declaration>). The body standard action accepts no attributes. So, JSP5.15 says that <jsp:text> <jsp:body>Hello world</jsp:body> </jsp:text> is invalid, and JSP.5.11 says that it is legal. How the standard should be read? Thanks, lg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
