svn commit: r541518 - /tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/webapps/docs/changelog.xml

2007-05-24 Thread billbarker
Author: billbarker Date: Thu May 24 20:07:55 2007 New Revision: 541518 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=541518 Log: doc changes Modified: tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/webapps/docs/changelog.xml Modified: tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/webapps/docs/changelog.xml URL: http://svn.apache.or

svn commit: r541517 - /tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/security/SecurityClassLoad.java

2007-05-24 Thread billbarker
Author: billbarker Date: Thu May 24 19:57:24 2007 New Revision: 541517 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=541517 Log: Allow for a forward/include to call getAttributeNames on the Request in a sandbox. This will offend the purests no end, but it what we do with o.a.c.u.Enumerator, an

Re: Annotation processing - Geronimo injection

2007-05-24 Thread David Jencks
On May 24, 2007, at 10:10 AM, Remy Maucherat wrote: David Jencks wrote: I tend to agree that a new branch is more appropriate. However, earlier versions of the patch had a compatibility layer so the old api could continue to work. I'm happy to add that back in on request. I am examini

Re: Publishing JAR's to Maven

2007-05-24 Thread Paul McMahan
This is great news! Thanks for all the effort, I know it was a major pain but I think it will pay off. I would like to replace geronimo's versions of the servlet 2.5, jsp 2.1, and el 1.0 spec jars with the versions of these jars you published to the main repository. As you may recall, ger

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42515] - API signature discrepancies in el-api

2007-05-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42515] New: - API signature discrepancies in el-api

2007-05-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42509] - API signature errors in javax.servlet.jsp

2007-05-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Security Policy Error

2007-05-24 Thread George Sexton
I'm really not sure if it's a bug or not. Here's exactly what's happening. I have an error handler com.mhsoftware.cdaily.servlet.ErrorServlet.based on a class com.MHSoftware.servlet.BaseServlet. The base class has a method called dumpRequest which dumps an HTTPServletRequestObject to a strin

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42509] - API signature error in TagInfo

2007-05-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: Security Policy Error

2007-05-24 Thread Bill Barker
It pretty obviously a bug. It looks like we need another PA :(. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Yoav Shapira > Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2007 8:34 AM > To: Tomcat Developers List > Subject: Re: Security Policy Error > > George, > Di

Re: Annotation processing - Geronimo injection

2007-05-24 Thread Remy Maucherat
David Jencks wrote: I tend to agree that a new branch is more appropriate. However, earlier versions of the patch had a compatibility layer so the old api could continue to work. I'm happy to add that back in on request. I am examining the patch in detail as part of the new trunk branch (ad

Re: svn commit: r541337 - in /tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/connector: CometEventImpl.java CoyoteAdapter.java

2007-05-24 Thread Remy Maucherat
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: fhanik Date: Thu May 24 08:47:29 2007 New Revision: 541337 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=541337 Log: Add in support to check if the current thread is a Tomcat 'worker' thread or not, that way we can decide if the invokations are appropriate or n

svn commit: r541337 - in /tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/connector: CometEventImpl.java CoyoteAdapter.java

2007-05-24 Thread fhanik
Author: fhanik Date: Thu May 24 08:47:29 2007 New Revision: 541337 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=541337 Log: Add in support to check if the current thread is a Tomcat 'worker' thread or not, that way we can decide if the invokations are appropriate or not Modified: tomcat/tr

Re: Security Policy Error

2007-05-24 Thread Yoav Shapira
George, Did anyone get back to you about this? I myself don't have much of a clue, as I haven't run Tomcat 5.5.x Tomcat under a security manager. Yoav On 5/21/07, George Sexton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm running Tomcat 5.5.23 under a security manager, and I'm hitting this error on a call t

svn commit: r541325 - /tomcat/connectors/trunk/jni/native/build/tcnative.m4

2007-05-24 Thread jfclere
Author: jfclere Date: Thu May 24 08:30:09 2007 New Revision: 541325 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=541325 Log: Arrange the check of openssl version. It was failing on Linux. Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/jni/native/build/tcnative.m4 Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/jni/n

Re: Versioning in sources

2007-05-24 Thread Tim Funk
Why not change dist.xml to rewrite ServerInfo.properties (and other appropriate files) when creating the distribution src pacakges? Then the extra commits are avoided. -Tim Remy Maucherat wrote: Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: aah, that makes sense. Remember that the release manager is carry

Re: Versioning in sources

2007-05-24 Thread William L. Thomson Jr.
On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 13:14 +0200, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: > > I'll try to remember to do it for 5.5.x, Great, pretty sure it was always done in the past. At least till 5.5.23 which was left at 5.5.20. > Remy will opt out doing it, so > you shouldn't depend on it. Ok that's to bad. :(

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42509] - API signature error in TagInfo

2007-05-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42509] New: - API signature error in TagInfo

2007-05-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

svn commit: r541278 - in /tomcat/site/trunk: docs/security-5.html xdocs/security-5.xml

2007-05-24 Thread markt
Author: markt Date: Thu May 24 04:56:30 2007 New Revision: 541278 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=541278 Log: Fix typos in affected version numbers. Modified: tomcat/site/trunk/docs/security-5.html tomcat/site/trunk/xdocs/security-5.xml Modified: tomcat/site/trunk/docs/sec

Re: Versioning in sources

2007-05-24 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 19:46 +0200, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: aah, that makes sense. Remember that the release manager is carrying his/her own build.properties, and if you build from source, you should too. in there you override any properties needed. That

Automatic detection of CPU/JVM for Win32/Win64

2007-05-24 Thread Mladen Turk
Hi, I've committed to the trunk the modified service.bat that automatically detects the host CPU (x86, amd64, ia64) and whether the JVM is 64 bit or not. So it automatically picks tomcat6.exe, amd64/tomcat6.exe depending on the above rules. However it requires that the .zip distro contains those