svn commit: r539266 - /tomcat/connectors/tags/jk1.2.x/JK_1_2_23/

2007-05-17 Thread rjung
Author: rjung Date: Thu May 17 22:45:37 2007 New Revision: 539266 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=539266 Log: Tag JK release 1.2.23 from 1.2.23 branch. Added: tomcat/connectors/tags/jk1.2.x/JK_1_2_23/ - copied from r539264, tomcat/connectors/branches/other/JK_1_2_23/ --

svn commit: r539263 - in /tomcat/connectors/branches/other/JK_1_2_23/jk: native/STATUS.txt native/common/jk_version.h native/common/portable.h.sample native/configure.in xdocs/index.xml xdocs/news/200

2007-05-17 Thread rjung
Author: rjung Date: Thu May 17 22:42:49 2007 New Revision: 539263 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=539263 Log: Prepare release of JK 1.2.23. Modified: tomcat/connectors/branches/other/JK_1_2_23/jk/native/STATUS.txt tomcat/connectors/branches/other/JK_1_2_23/jk/native/common/

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42445] - Building tomcat from source - serverinfo.properties not showing minor version

2007-05-17 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

svn commit: r539239 - /tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/webapps/ROOT/index.jsp

2007-05-17 Thread markt
Author: markt Date: Thu May 17 20:15:47 2007 New Revision: 539239 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=539239 Log: Fix link. Modified: tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/webapps/ROOT/index.jsp Modified: tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/webapps/ROOT/index.jsp URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat

svn commit: r539237 - /tomcat/build/tc5.5.x/build.properties.default

2007-05-17 Thread markt
Author: markt Date: Thu May 17 20:15:25 2007 New Revision: 539237 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=539237 Log: Remove cvs reference. Make it more obvious version numbers need to be changed for a release (bug 42445). Modified: tomcat/build/tc5.5.x/build.properties.default Modif

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42449] New: - JNDIRealm does not catch NullPointerException

2007-05-17 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

svn commit: r539066 - in /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/test/org/apache/catalina/tribes/demos: ChannelCreator.java IntrospectionUtils.java LoadTest.java

2007-05-17 Thread fhanik
Author: fhanik Date: Thu May 17 11:28:35 2007 New Revision: 539066 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=539066 Log: left overs Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/test/org/apache/catalina/tribes/demos/ChannelCreator.java tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/test/org/apache/catalina/tribes/demos/In

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42446] New: - Condition is likely to fail in org.apache.tomcat.util.digester.Digester

2007-05-17 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42445] New: - Building tomcat from source - serverinfo.properties not showing minor version

2007-05-17 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Annotation processing - Geronimo injection

2007-05-17 Thread David Jencks
On May 17, 2007, at 2:41 AM, Remy Maucherat wrote: David Jencks wrote: As far as I know I've addressed all the issues that were raised, but that might have a tenuous relationship to whether I actually did :-). I'd certainly appreciate review by tomcat committers before I completely forge

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42409] - Extra response headers not sent when using custom error page

2007-05-17 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

svn commit: r538977 - in /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk: java/org/apache/catalina/tribes/io/ java/org/apache/catalina/tribes/membership/ java/org/apache/catalina/tribes/transport/nio/ test/org/apache/catalina/

2007-05-17 Thread fhanik
Author: fhanik Date: Thu May 17 08:43:49 2007 New Revision: 538977 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=538977 Log: minor optimizations Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/tribes/io/ChannelData.java tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/tribes/member

svn commit: r538975 - in /tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk: native/common/jk_global.h xdocs/miscellaneous/changelog.xml xdocs/reference/apache.xml xdocs/webserver_howto/apache.xml xdocs/webserver_howto/nes.

2007-05-17 Thread rjung
Author: rjung Date: Thu May 17 08:40:49 2007 New Revision: 538975 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=538975 Log: Port 1.2.23 changes from 1.2.23 branch to trunk (r538911, r538964) Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/common/jk_global.h tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/xdocs/m

svn commit: r538966 - /tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/tools/jkrelease.sh

2007-05-17 Thread rjung
Author: rjung Date: Thu May 17 08:28:07 2007 New Revision: 538966 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=538966 Log: Port r538965 from 1.2.23 branch (enhanced jkrelease.sh script). Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/tools/jkrelease.sh Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/tools/jkre

svn commit: r538965 - /tomcat/connectors/branches/other/JK_1_2_23/jk/tools/jkrelease.sh

2007-05-17 Thread rjung
Author: rjung Date: Thu May 17 08:23:16 2007 New Revision: 538965 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=538965 Log: Add flag to release from a branch to release script. Modified: tomcat/connectors/branches/other/JK_1_2_23/jk/tools/jkrelease.sh Modified: tomcat/connectors/branches/ot

svn commit: r538964 - in /tomcat/connectors/branches/other/JK_1_2_23/jk/xdocs: reference/apache.xml webserver_howto/apache.xml

2007-05-17 Thread rjung
Author: rjung Date: Thu May 17 08:21:27 2007 New Revision: 538964 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=538964 Log: Small adjustments to the changed docs parts. Modified: tomcat/connectors/branches/other/JK_1_2_23/jk/xdocs/reference/apache.xml tomcat/connectors/branches/other/JK

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42444] New: - Potential NullPointerException in org.apache.catalina.valves.AccessLogValve

2007-05-17 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42409] - Extra response headers not sent when using custom error page

2007-05-17 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42443] New: - Please upload tomcat 5.5.23 jars (including jasper compile and runtime) to apache repository.

2007-05-17 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42442] - Upload 4.1.36 jars (including jasper compile and runtime) to apache repository.

2007-05-17 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42442] New: - Upload 4.1.34 jars (including jasper compile and runtime) to apache repository.

2007-05-17 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: New branch ?

2007-05-17 Thread Jim Jagielski
On May 17, 2007, at 7:46 AM, Remy Maucherat wrote: Hi, Because of the amount of proposed API changes, it could be a good idea to start a new 6.x branch (with a short release cycle). Or is it acceptable to do these in 6.0.x ? The list would be: - new Comet capabilities, with non blocking

Re: New branch ?

2007-05-17 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
Yoav Shapira wrote: Hi, On 5/17/07, Henri Gomez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > we're calling the existing one 6.0.x, > wouldn't it be reasonable to call the new one 6.1.x? 6.1 or 6.5 ? Like 5.0 and 5.5 :) Exactly my point -- the version number is not something we need to decide now ;) The bra

svn commit: r538920 - in /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk: java/org/apache/catalina/tribes/group/interceptors/OrderInterceptor.java test/org/apache/catalina/tribes/test/interceptors/TestOrderInterceptor.java

2007-05-17 Thread fhanik
Author: fhanik Date: Thu May 17 06:45:15 2007 New Revision: 538920 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=538920 Log: Add locks instead of synchronized statements to avoid issues between receiving and sending Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/tribes/group/inter

Re: New branch ?

2007-05-17 Thread Yoav Shapira
Hi, On 5/17/07, Henri Gomez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > we're calling the existing one 6.0.x, > wouldn't it be reasonable to call the new one 6.1.x? 6.1 or 6.5 ? Like 5.0 and 5.5 :) Exactly my point -- the version number is not something we need to decide now ;) The branch can be named for

svn commit: r538911 - in /tomcat/connectors/branches/other/JK_1_2_23/jk: native/common/jk_global.h xdocs/miscellaneous/changelog.xml xdocs/reference/apache.xml xdocs/webserver_howto/apache.xml

2007-05-17 Thread rjung
Author: rjung Date: Thu May 17 06:26:19 2007 New Revision: 538911 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=538911 Log: Change the default value of JkOptions to ForwardURICompatUnparsed and enhance documentation concerning the three possible forwarding options. Modified: tomcat/connector

svn commit: r538908 - in /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk: java/org/apache/catalina/tribes/group/interceptors/OrderInterceptor.java test/org/apache/catalina/tribes/test/interceptors/TestOrderInterceptor.java

2007-05-17 Thread fhanik
Author: fhanik Date: Thu May 17 06:19:59 2007 New Revision: 538908 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=538908 Log: Added in a unit test for ordering messages Added: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/test/org/apache/catalina/tribes/test/interceptors/TestOrderInterceptor.java Modified: tomc

Re: New branch ?

2007-05-17 Thread Henri Gomez
we're calling the existing one 6.0.x, wouldn't it be reasonable to call the new one 6.1.x? 6.1 or 6.5 ? Like 5.0 and 5.5 :) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: New branch ?

2007-05-17 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
Yoav Shapira wrote: Hi, On 5/17/07, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Because of the amount of proposed API changes, it could be a good idea to start a new 6.x branch (with a short release cycle). Or is it acceptable to do these in 6.0.x ? Like Filip and Mladen, I would prefer a new b

Re: New branch ?

2007-05-17 Thread Remy Maucherat
Jean-Frederic wrote: On Thu, 2007-05-17 at 13:46 +0200, Remy Maucherat wrote: Hi, Because of the amount of proposed API changes, it could be a good idea to start a new 6.x branch (with a short release cycle). Or is it acceptable to do these in 6.0.x ? If you make a new branch I think the be

Re: New branch ?

2007-05-17 Thread Jean-Frederic
On Thu, 2007-05-17 at 13:46 +0200, Remy Maucherat wrote: > Hi, > > Because of the amount of proposed API changes, it could be a good idea > to start a new 6.x branch (with a short release cycle). Or is it > acceptable to do these in 6.0.x ? If you make a new branch I think the best way is to br

Re: New branch ?

2007-05-17 Thread Yoav Shapira
Hi, On 5/17/07, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Because of the amount of proposed API changes, it could be a good idea to start a new 6.x branch (with a short release cycle). Or is it acceptable to do these in 6.0.x ? Like Filip and Mladen, I would prefer a new branch. It's pretty r

Re: New branch ?

2007-05-17 Thread Mladen Turk
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: +1 Sure, I'd prefer the new branch, it's a good idea in the scenario where the new changes may not be complete and we have to do a security fix/release 6.0 But then 6.0 should be frozen for any API change. 6.1.x would work If the 6.2 stable branch will fo

Re: New branch ?

2007-05-17 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
+1 Sure, I'd prefer the new branch, it's a good idea in the scenario where the new changes may not be complete and we have to do a security fix/release 6.0 6.1.x would work Filip Remy Maucherat wrote: Hi, Because of the amount of proposed API changes, it could be a good idea to start a ne

svn commit: r538878 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/tribes/transport/nio/ParallelNioSender.java

2007-05-17 Thread fhanik
Author: fhanik Date: Thu May 17 04:47:50 2007 New Revision: 538878 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=538878 Log: Avoid concurrent mod exception, remove from the iterator instead Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/tribes/transport/nio/ParallelNioSender.java

New branch ?

2007-05-17 Thread Remy Maucherat
Hi, Because of the amount of proposed API changes, it could be a good idea to start a new 6.x branch (with a short release cycle). Or is it acceptable to do these in 6.0.x ? The list would be: - new Comet capabilities, with non blocking IO - revised EE integration APIs (for annotation process

Re: Annotation processing - Geronimo injection

2007-05-17 Thread Remy Maucherat
David Jencks wrote: As far as I know I've addressed all the issues that were raised, but that might have a tenuous relationship to whether I actually did :-). I'd certainly appreciate review by tomcat committers before I completely forget how my patch works :-) The patch could see minor modi

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42439] - asdfasdfasdf

2007-05-17 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

svn commit: r538845 - in /tomcat/connectors/branches/other/JK_1_2_23/jk: native/STATUS.txt native/common/jk_version.h native/iis/installer/isapi-redirector-win32-msi.ism native/iis/isapi_redirect.rc x

2007-05-17 Thread rjung
Author: rjung Date: Thu May 17 02:12:40 2007 New Revision: 538845 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=538845 Log: Port post 1.2.22 changes to 1.2.23 branch: - version bump - docs changes about 1.2.22 release (revs 529275, 530028, 530038, 538842) Modified: tomcat/connectors/branches

svn commit: r538842 - /tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/xdocs/index.xml

2007-05-17 Thread rjung
Author: rjung Date: Thu May 17 01:58:28 2007 New Revision: 538842 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=538842 Log: Fix release date for 1.2.22 in docs welcome page (wrong month). Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/xdocs/index.xml Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/xdocs/index.x

svn commit: r538838 - /tomcat/connectors/branches/other/JK_1_2_23/

2007-05-17 Thread rjung
Author: rjung Date: Thu May 17 01:47:50 2007 New Revision: 538838 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=538838 Log: Create a branch to prepare 1.2.23 based on 1.2.22 plus small fix instead of trunk. Added: tomcat/connectors/branches/other/JK_1_2_23/ - copied from r538836, tomca

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42439] - asdfasdfasdf

2007-05-17 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42439] New: - asdfasdfasdf

2007-05-17 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu