DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36569] - Redirects produce illegal URL's

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36549] - Tomcat Stopped with HotSpot libjvm error

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36540] - pooled cluster replication does not seem ensure synchronized replication in tomcat 5.5.11

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36247] - Jasper throws IllegalStateException

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

svn commit: r453398 - in /tomcat/container/tc5.5.x: catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/servlets/DefaultServlet.java webapps/docs/changelog.xml

Author: markt Date: Thu Oct 5 14:46:48 2006 New Revision: 453398 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=453398 Log: Fix bug 36247. xml is text too. Modified: tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/servlets/DefaultServlet.java tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/web

Re: Bugzilla issue with project "Tomcat 6"

It's an old philosophical debate, with no end in sight, and I don't want to delve into it deeply. JIRA is free for FOSS projects to use, but it itself is not a free product in general. If you wanted to use it for your company, you'd have to pay. Some of us feel that we should set somewhat of an

Re: Bugzilla issue with project "Tomcat 6"

Yoav Shapira wrote: -0.5, close to -1 on JIRA on philosophical grounds, as it's not a free and open-source product... huh? its free for open source projects, I thought JIRA was widely used within the ASF, why wouldn't we? Filip Yoav On 10/5/06, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40691] - Test 3

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40691] New: - Test 3

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40690] - test

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40690] - test

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Bugzilla issue with project "Tomcat 6"

-0.5, close to -1 on JIRA on philosophical grounds, as it's not a free and open-source product... Yoav On 10/5/06, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: > Yoav Shapira wrote: >> It looks the same for Tomcat 5 and Tomcat 6 right now. The default >> milestone i

Re: Bugzilla issue with project "Tomcat 6"

Hi, I created a new milestone for Tomcat 6,called "default," and set it as the default milestone. Creating and editing an issue seems to work OK now. I created 40690 (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40690) and edited it a bit. If it works for you as well, great. Yoav On 10/5

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40690] - test

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40690] New: - test

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Bugzilla issue with project "Tomcat 6"

Remy Maucherat wrote: Yoav Shapira wrote: It looks the same for Tomcat 5 and Tomcat 6 right now. The default milestone is --- (three hyphens in a row). Should we add a dummy one for Tomcat 6, called "unspecified" or something like that? Feel free to try anything which could make it work :)

Re: Bugzilla issue with project "Tomcat 6"

Yoav Shapira wrote: It looks the same for Tomcat 5 and Tomcat 6 right now. The default milestone is --- (three hyphens in a row). Should we add a dummy one for Tomcat 6, called "unspecified" or something like that? Feel free to try anything which could make it work :) The only alternative is

Re: Bugzilla issue with project "Tomcat 6"

It looks the same for Tomcat 5 and Tomcat 6 right now. The default milestone is --- (three hyphens in a row). Should we add a dummy one for Tomcat 6, called "unspecified" or something like that? Yoav On 10/5/06, Yoav Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Let me see if I can add one. Yoav On 10

Re: Bugzilla issue with project "Tomcat 6"

Let me see if I can add one. Yoav On 10/5/06, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, There's an issue at the moment with the "Tomcat 6" product, more specifically about the definition of milestones: - if I add a milestone, bugs can be edited, but not created - if I remove the milestone,

Bugzilla issue with project "Tomcat 6"

Hi, There's an issue at the moment with the "Tomcat 6" product, more specifically about the definition of milestones: - if I add a milestone, bugs can be edited, but not created - if I remove the milestone, bugs can be created, but not edited The milestone feature is not actually used, so all

Re: Version of Tomcat on the home page

Thanks Mark, beat me to it Filip Mark Thomas wrote: Fernando Nasser wrote: Hi, Can someone bump the "production quality" release number in the little table in the "Apache Tomcat Versions" to 5.5.20? It is still 5.5.17 in there. Done. Thanks for pointing this out. The mirror will tak

Re: Version of Tomcat on the home page

will do, thanks for the notice Filip Fernando Nasser wrote: Hi, Can someone bump the "production quality" release number in the little table in the "Apache Tomcat Versions" to 5.5.20? It is still 5.5.17 in there. Regards to all, Fernando ---

Re: Version of Tomcat on the home page

Fernando Nasser wrote: > Hi, > > Can someone bump the "production quality" release number in the little > table in the "Apache Tomcat Versions" to 5.5.20? > It is still 5.5.17 in there. Done. Thanks for pointing this out. The mirror will take a little while to sync up. Mark ---

svn commit: r453317 - in /tomcat/site/trunk: docs/index.html xdocs/index.xml

Author: markt Date: Thu Oct 5 12:08:08 2006 New Revision: 453317 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=453317 Log: Update latest stable version. Modified: tomcat/site/trunk/docs/index.html tomcat/site/trunk/xdocs/index.xml Modified: tomcat/site/trunk/docs/index.html URL: http:

Version of Tomcat on the home page

Hi, Can someone bump the "production quality" release number in the little table in the "Apache Tomcat Versions" to 5.5.20? It is still 5.5.17 in there. Regards to all, Fernando - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fo

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36204] - Webapp unable to pick the Class by the shared classloader

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40679] - PermGen Space OutOfMemory Error after repeated Reload

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36179] - Error getting setter for Tag Attribute

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40679] - PermGen Space OutOfMemory Error after repeated Reload

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [VOTE] Split soTimeout to soTimeout and keepAliveTimeout

On Oct 2, 2006, at 7:24 AM, Mladen Turk wrote: Hi all, I propose that we split that to the real soTimeout which is the timeout between two consecutive read() on http request and the additional keepAliveTimeout that will be used for determining the timeout between two requests. [X] I'm for tha

Re: Tomcat keepAliveTimeout

On Sep 29, 2006, at 11:18 AM, Mladen Turk wrote: Hi, The problem is that we presume that socket timeout is keep-alive timeout, and that is wrong. The reason is simple because the time between two requests has noting to do with the the time the data will be read. FWIW, httpd separates the 2

Re: svn commit: r451157 - in /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache: catalina/connector/ coyote/ajp/ coyote/http11/ tomcat/util/net/

On Sep 29, 2006, at 8:39 AM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: mturk Date: Fri Sep 29 01:23:37 2006 New Revision: 451157 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=451157 Log: Introduce keepAliveTimeout to be able to separate the Keep-A

Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.1.34 Stability

Mark Thomas wrote: Peter Rossbach wrote: Apache Tomcat 4.1.34 is: [x ] Stable - no major issues I found only a small issue at service.bat Peter, I haven't forgotten this. It is sat in my inbox waiting for me to find the time to look at it. I found another (small) glitch: in the admin webap

Re: JIRA ?

Mark Thomas wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: Is there still interest to migrate ? Personally, I am interested in using JIRA for TC 6 (mainly because the bugzilla project does not work, What is broken? It looks OK but I didn't go as far as actually creating a bug. Ok, it goes like this: - if I ad

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40279] - ServletContext.getMinorVersion() returns 4

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: JIRA ?

Remy Maucherat wrote: > Is there still interest to migrate ? Personally, I am interested in > using JIRA for TC 6 (mainly because the bugzilla project does not work, What is broken? It looks OK but I didn't go as far as actually creating a bug. Mark -

Re: JIRA ?

Mark Thomas wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: Mark Thomas wrote: +0. If we do move to Jira then we should move all TC projects to Jira. Why exactly ? Continuity. It is easier to have all bugs in a single system than to field the continual "There wasn't a option for Tomcat X when creating a new bu

svn commit: r453200 - in /tomcat/site/trunk: docs/faq/misc.html docs/faq/printer/misc.html xdocs-faq/misc.xml

Author: markt Date: Thu Oct 5 05:22:04 2006 New Revision: 453200 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=453200 Log: Remove broken link. Modified: tomcat/site/trunk/docs/faq/misc.html tomcat/site/trunk/docs/faq/printer/misc.html tomcat/site/trunk/xdocs-faq/misc.xml Modified:

Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.1.34 Stability

Peter Rossbach wrote: >> Apache Tomcat 4.1.34 is: >> [x ] Stable - no major issues > > I found only a small issue at service.bat Peter, I haven't forgotten this. It is sat in my inbox waiting for me to find the time to look at it. Mark ---