svn commit: r453023 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/jasper/compiler/Generator.java

2006-10-04 Thread remm
Author: remm Date: Wed Oct 4 14:02:16 2006 New Revision: 453023 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=453023 Log: - Fix non deferred attributes evaluation. - Headache inducing patch submitted by Stan Silvert. Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/jasper/compiler/Generator.j

Re: Package renaming

2006-10-04 Thread William L. Thomson Jr.
On Wed, 2006-10-04 at 21:52 +0200, Remy Maucherat wrote: > William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: > > I have no foreseeable solution to building that jar on Gentoo at this > > time. I have discussed it extensively with others, and we are likely to > > have to do some package specific hacks or etc to build t

Re: Package renaming

2006-10-04 Thread Remy Maucherat
William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: I have no foreseeable solution to building that jar on Gentoo at this time. I have discussed it extensively with others, and we are likely to have to do some package specific hacks or etc to build that jar. In the mean time, those needing that jar are having to fetch

Re: Package renaming

2006-10-04 Thread Remy Maucherat
Peter Rossbach wrote: Hi! At which tomcat release you want to change it? 6.0 Of course. You want use the commons-logging 1.1 code base? No, probably use what is in the sandbox to start with. Rémy - To unsubscribe, e-mai

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40572] - Performance problem with org.apache.catalina.loader and JAXP, JSP

2006-10-04 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Package renaming

2006-10-04 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
I'm all for it, I don't like it, but it prevents version issues when users slap add in their own versions, hence it makes tomcat itself more manageable. Filip Remy Maucherat wrote: Hi, I think Tomcat would be more robust if commons-logging was package renamed (this is the last commons- whi

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38351] - context.xml not used when new host created.

2006-10-04 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Package renaming

2006-10-04 Thread William L. Thomson Jr.
On Wed, 2006-10-04 at 11:21 -0400, Yoav Shapira wrote: > Hi, > Pure neutral zero on this one, so I guess I'm not being particularly > helpful. On one hand I hate the renaming thing because it feels like > an ugly hack and it makes life more difficult for downstream > packagers. Please, please, pl

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40680] New: - SSL issue with X509 own signed certs but same in pkcs12 work

2006-10-04 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39088] - StandardWrapper getRootCause() infinite loop

2006-10-04 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40679] - PermGen Space OutOfMemory Error after repeated Reload

2006-10-04 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40679] New: - PermGen Space OutOfMemory Error after repeated Reload

2006-10-04 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Package renaming

2006-10-04 Thread Peter Rossbach
Hi! At which tomcat release you want to change it? 6.0 That change can be break subclasses or components from other people, not nice. Has you talk with Boris and future usage of his x4juli lib? But I also see your arguments to do that. Hmm! You want use the commons-logging 1.1 code base?

Re: Package renaming

2006-10-04 Thread Remy Maucherat
Yoav Shapira wrote: Hi, Pure neutral zero on this one, so I guess I'm not being particularly helpful. On one hand I hate the renaming thing because it feels like an ugly hack and it makes life more difficult for downstream packagers. On the other hand, we haven't had any DBCP-related complaints

Re: Package renaming

2006-10-04 Thread Yoav Shapira
Hi, Pure neutral zero on this one, so I guess I'm not being particularly helpful. On one hand I hate the renaming thing because it feels like an ugly hack and it makes life more difficult for downstream packagers. On the other hand, we haven't had any DBCP-related complaints (besides the one fro

Package renaming

2006-10-04 Thread Remy Maucherat
Hi, I think Tomcat would be more robust if commons-logging was package renamed (this is the last commons- which is not package renamed at the moment, BTW), so I propose doing that. It would mean integration with alternate loggers in Tomcat is more difficult (the wrapper would have to be pack

Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.1.34 Stability

2006-10-04 Thread Peter Rossbach
Apache Tomcat 4.1.34 is: [x ] Stable - no major issues I found only a small issue at service.bat Many thanks for that release Peter === My Mail from 14.09.2006 s. Hi Mark, I have tested Tomcat 4.1.34 at windows with jdk 1.4.2_12. The service.bat script don't add the %JAVA_HOME%/lib/tools.j

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40677] New: - PKCS11 keystore instead of JKS or PKCS12 keystore

2006-10-04 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.1.34 Stability

2006-10-04 Thread Remy Maucherat
Mark Thomas wrote: All, 4.1.34-beta has been available for just over a month. Tomcat 4.1.34 fixes all open bugs against the 4.1.x branch and updates the libraries to the latest versions. Please vote on its stability using the options below. I will also solicit feedback from the users list in ca

Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.1.34 Stability

2006-10-04 Thread Yoav Shapira
Hi, +1 / Stable, based on limited testing on my behalf. The license bits look fine, the checksums and PGP signatures look fine, building from source worked OK, the examples worked OK, and I ran one of my old apps on it for a few minutes with a JMeter script testing it. I don't know if any of my

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39088] - StandardWrapper getRootCause() infinite loop

2006-10-04 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu