DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37238] New: - Unable to start HTTPS listener using PKCS12 format certificate.

2005-10-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Status/Authority of AJP/1.5

2005-10-24 Thread Henri Gomez
AJP 1.5 should support automatic discovery of tomcat backend, new systems and new webapps. That's the current need for many of us when adding tomcats / webapp behind Apache 2 webservers. In such case we need to restart them and it's sad. How could it be accomplished, may be via a master tomcat wh

Re: Status/Authority of AJP/1.5

2005-10-24 Thread Costin Manolache
I see. Sorry, I've been sleeping for quite a while, I'm slowly getting up to speed with the latest developments. Are you saying that mod_proxy_ajp is significantly faster than mod_proxy ? That's interesting. To answer your question - ajp10 and ajp11 were used in JServ, developed in Apache. Ajp12

Re: Status/Authority of AJP/1.5

2005-10-24 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Costin Manolache wrote: I tought some time ago AJP was 'deprecated' - to be replaced with plain HTTP and mod_proxy ? Why? It turns out that mod_proxy_ajp v.s. mod_proxy_http does prove the validity of optimizing the backend connection. I don't think anyone forsees mod_jk being deprecated (at

Re: Status/Authority of AJP/1.5

2005-10-24 Thread Bill Barker
- Original Message - From: "Costin Manolache" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Developers List" Sent: Monday, October 24, 2005 3:11 PM Subject: Re: Status/Authority of AJP/1.5 >I tought some time ago AJP was 'deprecated' - to be replaced with >plain HTTP and mod_proxy ? > Once httpd-2.2

Context tag with path attribute

2005-10-24 Thread Vivek Lakshmanan
Hi Folks, I just noticed that the Context tag's path attribute is ignored (at least seems to be) in tomcat 5.5.9 unless it is included in the server.xml file statically. If an application were to be deployed at a context like /foo/bar in previous versions (5.0.28), I suppose that would require an e

Re: Status/Authority of AJP/1.5

2005-10-24 Thread Costin Manolache
I tought some time ago AJP was 'deprecated' - to be replaced with plain HTTP and mod_proxy ? Costin On 10/24/05, Bill Barker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > - Original Message - > From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: > Sent: Monday, October 24, 2005 1:52 PM > Subject: St

Re: Status/Authority of AJP/1.5

2005-10-24 Thread Bill Barker
- Original Message - From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Monday, October 24, 2005 1:52 PM Subject: Status/Authority of AJP/1.5 > Questions since some interesting ideas have popped up with respect to the > next flavor of AJP... firstoff, who holds the AJP standard

Status/Authority of AJP/1.5

2005-10-24 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Questions since some interesting ideas have popped up with respect to the next flavor of AJP... firstoff, who holds the AJP standard; is it the ASF? Second, what is the status of AJP/1.5 and where is it discussed? I would like to float some various questions to not only introduce some 'flush' s

follow up on 'busyness-based' load balancing patch: bug 36138

2005-10-24 Thread Chris Lamprecht
I'd like to follow up on a patch I submitted in August: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36138 The patch includes a new load balancing algorithm based on current worker "busyness" (lb.method=B). The details of the patch are in bugzilla, and of course, in the patch itself. It im

Re: [VOTE] JK 1.2.15

2005-10-24 Thread Glenn Nielsen
I have built mod_jk 1.2.15 for apache 2.0.55 on both Solaris 7 (Sun CC) and FreeBSD 5.3. Build and normal use appear to be fine. +1 to release as stable Regards, Glenn On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 05:56:55PM +0200, Mladen Turk wrote: > Hi, > > JK 1.2.15 has been tagged last week. > Please see the:

Re: [JK] Status -- was [VOTE] JK 1.2.15

2005-10-24 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Jean-frederic Clere wrote: Mladen Turk wrote: Anyhow, what should I do, since I've volunteer for a RM? Good questions... I mean, I don't expect to see the 1.3 branch for couple of months from now, well, that's neither here nor there w.r.t. 1.2.x - whoever needs to do new development (if

Re: [JK] Status -- was [VOTE] JK 1.2.15

2005-10-24 Thread Jean-frederic Clere
Mladen Turk wrote: William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Do you guys find something that would prevent 1.2.15 to be declared as stable that I'm missing? I'll try to find cycles to test myself, next week. I know I'm having alot of trouble with the apache 1.3 build on odd architectures, probably beca

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37220] - Semi-colon in filename HTTP bug

2005-10-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37220] - Semi-colon in filename HTTP bug

2005-10-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [JK] Status -- was [VOTE] JK 1.2.15

2005-10-24 Thread Peter Rossbach
Sorry for late response, but I start testing and hope finish the test at next two days First testresults at Suse 9.3, Windows XP looks very well Peter Mladen Turk schrieb: William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Do you guys find something that would prevent 1.2.15 to be declared as stable that I'm mi

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27371] - java.lang.ThreadDeath caused by log4j when reloading Tomcat app

2005-10-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27371] - java.lang.ThreadDeath caused by log4j when reloading Tomcat app

2005-10-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Sandbox ?

2005-10-24 Thread Remy Maucherat
Costin Manolache wrote: On 10/24/05, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: For sending a file on a socket - I'm sure using apr would be faster ( is sendfile wrapper implemented ? ), you shouldn't have to read the file in java. You need to look a bit into the code ;) There is: - APRized H

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27371] - java.lang.ThreadDeath caused by log4j when reloading Tomcat app

2005-10-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27371] - java.lang.ThreadDeath caused by log4j when reloading Tomcat app

2005-10-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Sandbox ?

2005-10-24 Thread Costin Manolache
On 10/24/05, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > For sending a file on a socket - I'm sure using apr would be faster ( > > is sendfile wrapper implemented ? ), you shouldn't have to read the > > file in java. > > You need to look a bit into the code ;) > > There is: > - APRized HTTP conn

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27371] - java.lang.ThreadDeath caused by log4j when reloading Tomcat app

2005-10-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [JK] Status -- was [VOTE] JK 1.2.15

2005-10-24 Thread Glenn Nielsen
I plan on installing 1.2.15 on FreeBSD 5.3 and Solaris 7 today and do some minimal testing. Glenn On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 03:17:56PM +0200, Mladen Turk wrote: > William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > >> > >>Do you guys find something that would prevent 1.2.15 to > >>be declared as stable that I'm missing?

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37218] - Configurable wait-time before invalidating ClassLoader on webapp redeploy

2005-10-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37218] - Configurable wait-time before invalidating ClassLoader on webapp redeploy

2005-10-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37220] - Semi-colon in filename HTTP bug

2005-10-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37218] - Configurable wait-time before invalidating ClassLoader on webapp redeploy

2005-10-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37220] - Semi-colon in filename HTTP bug

2005-10-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37220] - Semi-colon in filename HTTP bug

2005-10-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37220] New: - Semi-colon in filename HTTP bug

2005-10-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37218] - Configurable wait-time before invalidating ClassLoader on webapp redeploy

2005-10-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [JK] Status -- was [VOTE] JK 1.2.15

2005-10-24 Thread Mladen Turk
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Do you guys find something that would prevent 1.2.15 to be declared as stable that I'm missing? I'll try to find cycles to test myself, next week. I know I'm having alot of trouble with the apache 1.3 build on odd architectures, probably because the clash of a libt

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37218] - Configurable wait-time before invalidating ClassLoader on webapp redeploy

2005-10-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27371] - java.lang.ThreadDeath caused by log4j when reloading Tomcat app

2005-10-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37218] New: - Configurable wait-time before invalidating ClassLoader on webapp redeploy

2005-10-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37215] - Wrong interpretation of static Content(Excel-File)

2005-10-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37215] New: - Wrong interpretation of static Content(Excel-File)

2005-10-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Sandbox ?

2005-10-24 Thread Remy Maucherat
Costin Manolache wrote: On 10/23/05, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm thinking more as an 'uses' - you create ByteBuffers ( maybe direct buffers ), and you set it in the ByteChunk. "Extend" is not the best choice - it would be hard to work with direct ( or other ) buffers. I'm actu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37213] New: - problem when running tomcat with -security option

2005-10-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28222] - getRequestURL() in forwarded jsp/servlet doesn't return new url

2005-10-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu