On 28 June 2013 21:51, Fernando C.V. wrote:
>>> It's for people that don't know how to use FIFOs/process substitution
>>> properly ;-)
>>>
>>
>> should suffice:
>>
>> cat file | tee >(sort -u > sorted) >(sort -R > unsorted)
>>
>
> That's a bashism, not POSIX. Not much better than using pee
>
> --
>> It's for people that don't know how to use FIFOs/process substitution
>> properly ;-)
>>
>
> should suffice:
>
> cat file | tee >(sort -u > sorted) >(sort -R > unsorted)
>
That's a bashism, not POSIX. Not much better than using pee
--
Fernando Carmona Varo
On 27 June 2013 02:43, Chris Down wrote:
> On 27 June 2013 14:33, Martti Kühne wrote:
>> Still. What's pee good for? A quick google disappointed my
>> expectations in that matter.
>
> It's for people that don't know how to use FIFOs/process substitution
> properly ;-)
>
should suffice:
cat file
On 27 June 2013 14:33, Martti Kühne wrote:
> Still. What's pee good for? A quick google disappointed my
> expectations in that matter.
It's for people that don't know how to use FIFOs/process substitution
properly ;-)
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 5:43 AM, Strake wrote:
> On 25/06/2013, Martti Kühne wrote:
>> [...]
>>> pee
>>
>> And a cloth to clean up the mess...
>
> No, that's what sponge is for.
>
Still. What's pee good for? A quick google disappointed my
expectations in that matter.
cheers!
mar77i
On 25/06/2013, Martti Kühne wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Calvin Morrison
> wrote:
>> my votes are for at a minimum are for:
>>
>> sponge
>> tee
>> pee
>
> And a cloth to clean up the mess...
No, that's what sponge is for.
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Calvin Morrison wrote:
> my votes are for at a minimum are for:
>
> sponge
> tee
> pee
And a cloth to clean up the mess...
busybox ash.
my votes are for at a minimum are for:
sponge
tee
pee
On 25 June 2013 10:54, Daniel Bryan wrote:
>> first of all, some things in moreutils would be awesome
>
> Especially if they weren't written in Perl.
> first of all, some things in moreutils would be awesome
Especially if they weren't written in Perl.
Am 2013-06-25 16:42, schrieb Jesse Ogle:
I understood sbase to have a loose correspondence to coreutils. Is
this the case? Coreutils does not have a shell, or am I wrong about
that?
I don't think „Everyone is doing it this way“ is a valid argument in
any discussion.
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at
On 25 June 2013 10:45, Chris Down wrote:
> On 25 June 2013 22:42, Jesse Ogle wrote:
>> I understood sbase to have a loose correspondence to coreutils. Is
>> this the case? Coreutils does not have a shell, or am I wrong about
>> that?
>
> GNU coreutils has no shell, it is packaged separately (as G
On 25 June 2013 22:42, Jesse Ogle wrote:
> I understood sbase to have a loose correspondence to coreutils. Is
> this the case? Coreutils does not have a shell, or am I wrong about
> that?
GNU coreutils has no shell, it is packaged separately (as GNU bash).
I understood sbase to have a loose correspondence to coreutils. Is
this the case? Coreutils does not have a shell, or am I wrong about
that?
Jesse
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Calvin Morrison
wrote:
> why not rc?
>
> On 25 June 2013 10:10, Carlos Torres wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 8:
why not rc?
On 25 June 2013 10:10, Carlos Torres wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 8:58 AM, Galos, David
> wrote:
>>> What is your opinion on a shell for sbase?
>>
>> The shell is a topic around which there is far too much religion.
>> Sbase should not include a shell.
>>
>
> :) i like this answe
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 8:58 AM, Galos, David
wrote:
>> What is your opinion on a shell for sbase?
>
> The shell is a topic around which there is far too much religion.
> Sbase should not include a shell.
>
:) i like this answer
> What is your opinion on a shell for sbase?
The shell is a topic around which there is far too much religion.
Sbase should not include a shell.
[2013-06-25 13:02] Christian Neukirchen
> Chris Down writes:
>
> > On 25 June 2013 18:01, Christian Neukirchen wrote:
> >> pmarin writes:
> >>
> >>> dash has a broken builtin echo command and they are not interested in
> >>> fix it. I think busybox ash fixed the problem.
> >>>
> >>> dash> echo
Chris Down writes:
> On 25 June 2013 18:01, Christian Neukirchen wrote:
>> pmarin writes:
>>
>>> dash has a broken builtin echo command and they are not interested in
>>> fix it. I think busybox ash fixed the problem.
>>>
>>> dash> echo '\tshit'
>>> shit
>>> ash> echo '\tshit'
>>> \tshit
>>
Chris Down dixit:
>try mksh.
FWIW, mksh has three different “echo”; if invoked as mksh, it uses
a BSD echo by default which does interpret backslashes, but if one
uses set -o posix (or invokes it as sh or -sh and it is compiled
with -DMKSH_BINSHPOSIX (CVS HEAD)) it has an echo that only honours
-
Quoth pmarin:
> dash has a broken builtin echo command and they are not interested in
> fix it. I think busybox ash fixed the problem.
Is it really broken? I got the impression from [0] that echo was so
badly specified that one shouldn't trust it to do much at all,
though I confess I haven't rea
On 25 June 2013 18:01, Christian Neukirchen wrote:
> pmarin writes:
>
>> dash has a broken builtin echo command and they are not interested in
>> fix it. I think busybox ash fixed the problem.
>>
>> dash> echo '\tshit'
>> shit
>> ash> echo '\tshit'
>> \tshit
>
> That is bad indeed. Know any
pmarin writes:
> dash has a broken builtin echo command and they are not interested in
> fix it. I think busybox ash fixed the problem.
>
> dash> echo '\tshit'
> shit
> ash> echo '\tshit'
> \tshit
That is bad indeed. Know any other problems?
--
Christian Neukirchenhttp://chneukirchen.
dash has a broken builtin echo command and they are not interested in
fix it. I think busybox ash fixed the problem.
dash> echo '\tshit'
shit
ash> echo '\tshit'
\tshit
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 11:32 PM, Christian Neukirchen
wrote:
> Markus Teich writes:
>
>> What is your opinion on a shell f
Markus Teich writes:
> What is your opinion on a shell for sbase?
I had a look at dash, which is sh-compatible and fairly small, and the
code did not look half as bad as I expected it to be.
--
Christian Neukirchenhttp://chneukirchen.org
25 matches
Mail list logo
