; >>>> main Solr repo.Or, be promoted to some repo that doesn’t have
> >>> “sandbox”
> >>>> in the name, like the Solr-operator project….
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> On Sep 8, 2023, at 4:50 PM, David Smil
The only real complexity around it is properly dealing with the queue in a
large scale production environment, and none of that is code complexity.
CrossDC is a critical feature for many, the problem with the previous
iteration was it tried to be the queuing system and was obviously never
going to
t;>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Houston,
>>>>>
>>>>> Can you please elaborate on the purpose:
>>>>>> and moving it into Solr would allow others to use and collaborate on
>>> it
>>>>> easier.
>
It has integration tests, Kafka has an embedded version for tests, just no
CI setup currently. If it comes into Solr, it will just pick up Solr’s CI.
The design can work with any queuing system, but due to the various
intricacies involved in the different queue implementations, adding support
is b
Hi Anshum,
I mostly agree with you. My point is that we shouldn't *release* it until
broader community has had a chance to weigh in, both development and
testing. Towards that, I like Jan's idea of using PRs etc for more code
reviews, before merging it to some official branch.
I'm not comfortable
Hi,
There has for sure been interest since CDCR disappeared. Given the close
integration with Solr and its small footprint, I’m supportive of this becoming
a Solr module with URP and a standalone app in the main repo.
So the code can be cleaned up, documented and migrated over in a few PRs as a
I wouldn't term people who work at a particular company as
committers. I'm reasonably sure when folks contribute to the project they
wear their ASF hat. If they don't, they should.
Like most other features, this one also is a result of the need by users of
the project. I completely agree it's bee
rate on
> > it
> > > > easier.
> > > >
> > > > How is that?
> > > >
> > > > I am guessing another motivation may be visibility / awareness. If
> > that
> > > is
> > > > a motivation, I think that can be add
; is
> > > a motivation, I think that can be addressed with prominent references
> in
> > > the Solr Reference Guide and website news updates.
> > >
> > > ~ David
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Sep 7, 2023 at 12:33 PM Houston Putman
> >
e Solr Reference Guide and website news updates.
> >
> > ~ David
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 7, 2023 at 12:33 PM Houston Putman
> wrote:
> >
> >> Hey everyone,
> >>
> >> I think it's a good time to talk about the future of
with prominent references in
> the Solr Reference Guide and website news updates.
>
> ~ David
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 7, 2023 at 12:33 PM Houston Putman wrote:
>
>> Hey everyone,
>>
>> I think it's a good time to talk about the future of the cross DC work
>>
ces in
the Solr Reference Guide and website news updates.
~ David
On Thu, Sep 7, 2023 at 12:33 PM Houston Putman wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> I think it's a good time to talk about the future of the cross DC work
> that's been going on in the Solr Sandbox repo.
>
> Ma
Hey everyone,
I think it's a good time to talk about the future of the cross DC work
that's been going on in the Solr Sandbox repo.
Mark (and others) have been doing amazing work there, and I think it's
close to a state that we can bring it out of the sandbox and into Solr
it
13 matches
Mail list logo