was:<55>
>> > >>>>>at
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>
>> __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([11EF0AA307058EA1:CD5AB0CEBDD35C89]:0)
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>> 2> 563294 ERROR (qtp187353745
511-null-134677) [n:
> 127.0.0.1:34489
> > >>>> _solr
> > >>>>> c:expiring_secure s:shard2 r:core_node7
> > >>>> x:expiring_secure_shard2_replica_n3
> > >>>>> t:null-134677] o.a.s.h.RequestHandlerBase Client except
e s:shard2 r:core_node7
> >>>> x:expiring_secure_shard2_replica_n3
> >>>>> t:null-134677] o.a.s.h.RequestHandlerBase Client exception
> >>>>> 2> => org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: can not use
> >>>>> FieldCac
de7
>>>> x:expiring_secure_shard2_replica_n3
>>>>> t:null-134677] o.a.s.h.RequestHandlerBase Client exception
>>>>> 2> => org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: can not use
>>>>> FieldCache on a field w/o docValues unless it is indexed
type supports Uninversion: _version_
> > > > 2> at
> > > >
> > >
> > org.apache.solr.schema.SchemaField.checkFieldCacheSource(SchemaField.java:295)
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Aug 1, 2024 at 7:22 AM Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON)
> > &l
e Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON)
> <
> > > cpoersc...@bloomberg.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > > If there is time I'd like to nominate
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17386 and
> > > > https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2
hke (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON) <
> > cpoersc...@bloomberg.net> wrote:
> >
> > > If there is time I'd like to nominate
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17386 and
> > > https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2607 to be in the 9.7 release.
> > >
>
N) <
> cpoersc...@bloomberg.net> wrote:
>
> > If there is time I'd like to nominate
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17386 and
> > https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2607 to be in the 9.7 release.
> >
> > -Christine
> >
> > F
://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17386 and
>> https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2607 to be in the 9.7 release.
>>
>> -Christine
>>
>> From: dev@solr.apache.org At: 07/29/24 15:50:24 UTC+1:00To:
>> dev@solr.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Solr 9.7 rele
t; If there is time I'd like to nominate
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17386 and
> https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2607 to be in the 9.7 release.
>
> -Christine
>
> From: dev@solr.apache.org At: 07/29/24 15:50:24 UTC+1:00To:
> dev@solr.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [D
If there is time I'd like to nominate
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17386 and
https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2607 to be in the 9.7 release.
-Christine
From: dev@solr.apache.org At: 07/29/24 15:50:24 UTC+1:00To: dev@solr.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Solr 9.7 re
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17298 is more or less ready, but
would like it to at least have a few days sitting in main before I backport
it. Without it the multi-threaded search needs to be documented as not
working with cpuTimeAllowed.
On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 12:31 PM Anshum Gupta
Hey Anshum, due to the delay I've merged and backported
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10808 (New schema version where
docValues=true by default)
In that PR, Tomas mentioned adding
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12963 (Setting
uninvertible=false by default).
The PR for tha
Really hoping to get https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2593 and
https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2577 in for 9.7 as well.
I’ve asked on the user mailing list for help testing the changes out on
Windows, so hopefully we get some confirmation the work I’ve done is bug free
and it won’t hold
I hadn't realized it wasn't marked for 9.7 but
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17298 was always intended as a
blocker as well.
On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 12:31 PM Anshum Gupta
wrote:
> Sure, I'll wait until the 30th. Thanks for letting me know.
>
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 9:39 PM Ishan C
Sure, I'll wait until the 30th. Thanks for letting me know.
On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 9:39 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Anshum,
> I'm still working on unblocking SOLR-13350. Can we please push the date
> back by a week, say 30 July?
>
> Thanks and regards,
> Isha
Hi Anshum,
I'm still working on unblocking SOLR-13350. Can we please push the date
back by a week, say 30 July?
Thanks and regards,
Ishan
On Wed, 24 Jul, 2024, 10:52 pm Anshum Gupta, wrote:
> As there are still a few dependency upgrade PRs open, I'll give it a few
> days and try and help review
As there are still a few dependency upgrade PRs open, I'll give it a few
days and try and help review + merge those in before starting the process
later this week.
On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 10:04 AM Eric Pugh
wrote:
> I would like to see the back port of solr cli changes make it…
> https://github.
I would like to see the back port of solr cli changes make it…
https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2540
Thanks to some great work from Jan I suspect it can be committed this week.
On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 6:55 PM David Smiley wrote:
> There is at least one blocker, a notable one:
> https://iss
There is at least one blocker, a notable one:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13350 (search segments in
parallel)
On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 4:12 PM Anshum Gupta wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> The Change log for Solr 9.7 looks pretty good already with the Lucene
> upgrade and a bunch of othe
Hi,
Sounds ok.
Will try to merge some of the latest dependency upgrades. There are still ~30
dependency PRs, so anyone feel free to jump in and resolve some of them before
the release.
Jan
> 16. juli 2024 kl. 22:12 skrev Anshum Gupta :
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> The Change log for Solr 9.7 looks
Hi everyone,
The Change log for Solr 9.7 looks pretty good already with the Lucene
upgrade and a bunch of other fixes, improvements, and features.
I'd like to start the release process next *Tuesday, July 23 *unless there
are objections or reasons to wait.
-Anshum
22 matches
Mail list logo
