I'm working on creating the branch right now. Should be done soon and I'll send an email update once it's done.
On Sat, Aug 3, 2024 at 10:31 AM Anshum Gupta <ans...@anshumgupta.net> wrote: > Thanks for the update, Erik. > > David - I didn’t intend to suggest a feature freeze but wanted to check if > there was something that must make it into 9.7 based on what everyone was > working on. > > I’ll cut a branch on by Monday unless there’s a reason for us to wait. > > > Anshum Gupta > > > On Sat, Aug 3, 2024 at 10:27 David Smiley <dsmi...@apache.org> wrote: > >> Eric, merge away; no need to ask permission. Without a release branch >> (there *still* isn't one), it's not reasonable for the RM to begin a >> feature freeze as was kind of hinted at. It's still open season! >> >> On Sat, Aug 3, 2024 at 7:54 AM Eric Pugh >> <ep...@opensourceconnections.com> wrote: >> > >> > I had earlier asked to wait to get both >> https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2593 and >> https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2577 into 9.7. >> > >> > 2577 is in, and Jenkins for main and branch_9x seem to have passed (the >> failures are on the prometheus tests)…. 2577 fixes a lot of documentation >> and user messages and I think is important for 9.7. >> > >> > 2593 needs more work, and is all “behind the scenes” changes, so if it >> ends up in 9.8 that is okay. >> > >> > Eric >> > >> > >> > > On Aug 3, 2024, at 12:59 AM, David Smiley <dsmi...@apache.org> wrote: >> > > >> > > The release branch has not yet been cut. Anshum, based on your >> > > comments, I think you should cut it. I would like to merge things to >> > > branch_9x without it going to 9.7 as I would like more bake time on >> > > some things. >> > > >> > > On Fri, Aug 2, 2024 at 3:09 PM Gus Heck <gus.h...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> >> > >> For https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17298 >> > >> >> > >> I think the key thing that remains is to verify if the exclusion of >> > >> graph/join/rerank queries really is correct. The tests didn't fail >> out of >> > >> the box when I removed that restriction, but I want to add some >> tests that >> > >> explicitly turn it on to be sure. >> > >> >> > >> -Gus >> > >> >> > >> On Fri, Aug 2, 2024 at 2:50 PM Anshum Gupta <ans...@anshumgupta.net> >> wrote: >> > >> >> > >>> Do we have an estimate on when the open issues will get wrapped up? >> I >> > >>> certainly would recommend that we don't rush with releasing code and >> > >>> instead let it bake. If it's almost done, I can create the branch >> early >> > >>> next week and wait a couple of days before moving forward with the >> release. >> > >>> >> > >>> There's no rush, but I wouldn't want to be blocked indefinitely. >> > >>> >> > >>> On Thu, Aug 1, 2024 at 1:14 PM David Smiley <dsmi...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> > >>> >> > >>>> For the Prometheus test failures, I re-opened the issue. Consider >> > >>>> that one just test noise; we should ignore it if it doesn't get >> fixed >> > >>>> soon. >> > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17368 >> > >>>> >> > >>>> On Thu, Aug 1, 2024 at 8:34 AM Gus Heck <gus.h...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> Also looking at >> > >>>> http://fucit.org/solr-jenkins-reports/failure-report.html >> > >>>>> we have a couple tests with high fail rates. This one seems to be >> > >>>>> reproducible (reliably with seed, but also not hard to generate >> > >>> without) >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> org.apache.solr.cloud.DistribDocExpirationUpdateProcessorTest > >> > >>>> testNoAuth >> > >>>>> FAILED >> > >>>>> java.lang.AssertionError: Give up waiting for no results: >> > >>>>> >> > >>>> >> > >>> >> q=should_expire_s:yup&rows=0&_trace=init_batch_check&_stateVer_=expiring:13 >> > >>>>> expected:<0> but was:<55> >> > >>>>> at >> > >>>>> >> > >>> >> __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([11EF0AA307058EA1:CD5AB0CEBDD35C89]:0) >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> 2> 563294 ERROR (qtp1873537458-54511-null-134677) [n: >> 127.0.0.1:34489 >> > >>>> _solr >> > >>>>> c:expiring_secure s:shard2 r:core_node7 >> > >>>> x:expiring_secure_shard2_replica_n3 >> > >>>>> t:null-134677] o.a.s.h.RequestHandlerBase Client exception >> > >>>>> 2> => org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: can not use >> > >>>>> FieldCache on a field w/o docValues unless it is indexed >> > >>>> uninvertible=true >> > >>>>> and the type supports Uninversion: _version_ >> > >>>>> 2> at >> > >>>>> >> > >>>> >> > >>> >> org.apache.solr.schema.SchemaField.checkFieldCacheSource(SchemaField.java:295) >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> On Thu, Aug 1, 2024 at 7:22 AM Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/ >> LONDON) >> > >>> < >> > >>>>> cpoersc...@bloomberg.net> wrote: >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>>> If there is time I'd like to nominate >> > >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17386 and >> > >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2607 to be in the 9.7 >> release. >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> -Christine >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> From: dev@solr.apache.org At: 07/29/24 15:50:24 UTC+1:00To: >> > >>>>>> dev@solr.apache.org >> > >>>>>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Solr 9.7 release >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17298 is more or less >> > >>>> ready, >> > >>>>>> but >> > >>>>>> would like it to at least have a few days sitting in main before >> I >> > >>>> backport >> > >>>>>> it. Without it the multi-threaded search needs to be documented >> as >> > >>> not >> > >>>>>> working with cpuTimeAllowed. >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 12:31 PM Anshum Gupta < >> > >>> ans...@anshumgupta.net> >> > >>>>>> wrote: >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> Sure, I'll wait until the 30th. Thanks for letting me know. >> > >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 9:39 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < >> > >>>>>>> ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>> Hi Anshum, >> > >>>>>>>> I'm still working on unblocking SOLR-13350. Can we please push >> > >>> the >> > >>>> date >> > >>>>>>>> back by a week, say 30 July? >> > >>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>> Thanks and regards, >> > >>>>>>>> Ishan >> > >>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>> On Wed, 24 Jul, 2024, 10:52 pm Anshum Gupta, < >> > >>>> ans...@anshumgupta.net> >> > >>>>>>>> wrote: >> > >>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>> As there are still a few dependency upgrade PRs open, I'll >> give >> > >>>> it a >> > >>>>>>> few >> > >>>>>>>>> days and try and help review + merge those in before starting >> > >>> the >> > >>>>>>> process >> > >>>>>>>>> later this week. >> > >>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 10:04 AM Eric Pugh < >> > >>>>>>>>> ep...@opensourceconnections.com> >> > >>>>>>>>> wrote: >> > >>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>> I would like to see the back port of solr cli changes make >> > >>> it… >> > >>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2540 >> > >>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>> Thanks to some great work from Jan I suspect it can be >> > >>>> committed >> > >>>>>> this >> > >>>>>>>>> week. >> > >>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 6:55 PM David Smiley < >> > >>>> dsmi...@apache.org> >> > >>>>>>>> wrote: >> > >>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>> There is at least one blocker, a notable one: >> > >>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13350 (search >> > >>>>>> segments >> > >>>>>>> in >> > >>>>>>>>>>> parallel) >> > >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 4:12 PM Anshum Gupta < >> > >>>> ans...@apache.org> >> > >>>>>>>>> wrote: >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi everyone, >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> The Change log for Solr 9.7 looks pretty good already >> > >>> with >> > >>>> the >> > >>>>>>>> Lucene >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> upgrade and a bunch of other fixes, improvements, and >> > >>>> features. >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> I'd like to start the release process next *Tuesday, July >> > >>>> 23 >> > >>>>>>>> *unless >> > >>>>>>>>>>> there >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> are objections or reasons to wait. >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> -Anshum >> > >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> >> > >>> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > >>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org >> > >>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org >> > >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>> -- >> > >>>>>>>>> Anshum Gupta >> > >>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> -- >> > >>>>>>> Anshum Gupta >> > >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> -- >> > >>>>>> http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work) >> > >>>>>> https://a.co/d/b2sZLD9 (my fantasy fiction book) >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> -- >> > >>>>> http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work) >> > >>>>> https://a.co/d/b2sZLD9 (my fantasy fiction book) >> > >>>> >> > >>>> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org >> > >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org >> > >>>> >> > >>>> >> > >>> >> > >>> -- >> > >>> Anshum Gupta >> > >>> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> -- >> > >> http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work) >> > >> https://a.co/d/b2sZLD9 (my fantasy fiction book) >> > > >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org >> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org >> > > >> > >> > _______________________ >> > Eric Pugh | Founder | OpenSource Connections, LLC | 434.466.1467 | >> http://www.opensourceconnections.com < >> http://www.opensourceconnections.com/> | My Free/Busy < >> http://tinyurl.com/eric-cal> >> > Co-Author: Apache Solr Enterprise Search Server, 3rd Ed < >> https://www.packtpub.com/big-data-and-business-intelligence/apache-solr-enterprise-search-server-third-edition-raw >> > >> > This e-mail and all contents, including attachments, is considered to >> be Company Confidential unless explicitly stated otherwise, regardless of >> whether attachments are marked as such. >> > >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org >> >> -- Anshum Gupta
