It is in there. Definitely start the steps now anshum. You dont have to be
ready to do the release to do the first 1/3 of them.
On Mon, Aug 5, 2024 at 10:54 PM David Smiley wrote:
> Does the release wizard not have the next version (9.8) in JIRA get
> created? Ideally that is done with the bran
Does the release wizard not have the next version (9.8) in JIRA get
created? Ideally that is done with the branch freezing so as to
resolve JIRA issues not making the release.
On Mon, Aug 5, 2024 at 11:44 PM David Smiley wrote:
>
> This change here is a super simple fix to the new
> PrometheusRe
This change here is a super simple fix to the new
PrometheusResponseWriter mime type:
https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2616
I'd like to get this in.
On Mon, Aug 5, 2024 at 3:46 PM Anshum Gupta wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I've created the release branch for 9.7. Can you please let me know what'
Hey all, so https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2381 moves the various
commands for doing a snapshot from the
/solr/server/cloud-scripts/snapshotcli.sh script into the bin/solr overall
structure! I had no idea that we had CLI tooling for managing snapshots!
The one slightly icky/weird thing is
Hi everyone,
I've created the release branch for 9.7. Can you please let me know what's
pending and needs to still make it into the release?
Thanks!
--
Anshum Gupta
I'm working on creating the branch right now. Should be done soon and I'll
send an email update once it's done.
On Sat, Aug 3, 2024 at 10:31 AM Anshum Gupta wrote:
> Thanks for the update, Erik.
>
> David - I didn’t intend to suggest a feature freeze but wanted to check if
> there was something
I just finished some benchmarking work using Solr's benchmark module.
It should be pretty easy to tweak an existing benchmark to try both.
Purely from a maintainability standpoint, we could make a hard break
decision in Solr 10.
On Mon, Aug 5, 2024 at 1:00 PM Jason Gerlowski wrote:
>
> My hunch i
On Mon, Aug 5, 2024 at 1:10 PM Eric Pugh
wrote:
> The lenient parsing thing is cool till you try to take the same json
> structure and use it in something else and it blows up.
^^^ This! 100% agree.
The lenient parsing thing is cool till you try to take the same json structure
and use it in something else and it blows up.
I’d love to see a comparison of the performance differences, and assuming no
diff or minimal, then move to Jackson!
> On Aug 5, 2024, at 1:03 PM, Gus Heck wrote:
>
> II
When Yonik wrote noggit, there was nothing else that came close to it in
terms of performance. Jackson might have caught up by now.
Good idea to re-evaluate both once again.
On Mon, 5 Aug 2024 at 22:30, Jason Gerlowski wrote:
> My hunch is that Jackson would be more performant than Noggit, but I
IIUC there were supposed to be memory advantages to noggit. I have not seen
this quantified, and the relevance of those advantages over current jackson
(vs libs available in the early 2000's) seems like a valid thing to
investigate.
Unfortunately, we have areas where we support json with duplicate
My hunch is that Jackson would be more performant than Noggit, but I
don't have any hard numbers to back that up so it's just an educated
guess. I swear there was some other issue that gave Noggit vs.
Jackson numbers but I can't find it now. SOLR-16691 (where Noble
switched at least some things o
This is the dev list for people who are actively working on improving solr.
There are fewer people here and they are typically busier with active tasks
and have less time to help. This question would be better off posted on the
user's list. Additionally, you will need to give a lot more detail befo
Hi ,
I am using solr 7 and jdk17 for java , and our base application runs on Drupal
7.9.2,Since we have updated the jdk version from 8 to 17. We are facing 502
Proxy Errors intermittently, and site is going down. Can you please suggest us
what needs to be done here.
Regards,
Sowjanya
15 matches
Mail list logo
