7
> À : Maven Developers List
> Objet : Re: [VOTE] Release maven and plugins parent pom
>
> I deployed a new version of maven-scm-provider-cvsjava
> without the uppercase, sorry.
>
> Emmanuel
>
> Cabasson Denis a écrit :
> > Hi folks!
> >
> > Having t
on is named maven-scm-provider-cvsJava (upper case j).
Isn't that a bug of some sort?
Cheers.
Denis.
-Message d'origine-
De : Daniel Kulp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : jeudi 15 mars 2007 16:02
À : dev@maven.apache.org
Objet : Re: [VOTE] Release maven and plugins pa
-Message d'origine-
> De : Daniel Kulp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Envoyé : jeudi 15 mars 2007 16:02
> À : dev@maven.apache.org
> Objet : Re: [VOTE] Release maven and plugins parent pom
>
> Brian,
>
> You can see what happens just by running:
> mvn -Prelease pack
---Original Message-
> From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2007 7:46 PM
> To: dev@maven.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release maven and plugins parent pom
>
> On Wednesday 14 March 2007 18:59, Brian E. Fox wrote:
> > Is there a way to
-
From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2007 7:46 PM
To: dev@maven.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release maven and plugins parent pom
On Wednesday 14 March 2007 18:59, Brian E. Fox wrote:
> Is there a way to include notice and license files in the jars
7;s actually one reason we didn't discover
the SNAPSHOT issue since the releases, by definition, don't contain
snapshots.
Dan
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2007 4:15 PM
> To: dev@maven.apache.or
Is there a way to include notice and license files in the jars by
default?
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2007 4:15 PM
To: dev@maven.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release maven and plugins parent pom
On Wednesday 14 March 2007
go for it ;)
On 3/14/07, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wednesday 14 March 2007 16:05, Carlos Sanchez wrote:
> so we use the latest apache parent
If we do, we should update to the latest gpg and remote resource things
as well. Specifically gpg so we don't have to have passphrases b
On Wednesday 14 March 2007 16:05, Carlos Sanchez wrote:
> so we use the latest apache parent
If we do, we should update to the latest gpg and remote resource things
as well. Specifically gpg so we don't have to have passphrases burned
into our settings.xml.
--
J. Daniel Kulp
Principal Eng
so we use the latest apache parent
--
I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
-- The Princess Bride
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional c
10 matches
Mail list logo
