Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.0-alpha-2

2009-02-05 Thread Jason van Zyl
ository in case you're trying to build against it, but they are separated into different repos. -Original Message- From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:dk...@apache.org] Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 9:21 AM To: dev@maven.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.0-alpha-2 -1 on a procedura

RE: [VOTE] Maven 3.0-alpha-2

2009-02-05 Thread Brian E. Fox
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.0-alpha-2 I'll withdraw my -1 and put a +1 That said, in the future, make sure the appropriate URL is used in the VOTE message. The vote needs to be very clear exactly which artifacts (and no others) are being voted on. It might be best to separate it

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.0-alpha-2

2009-02-05 Thread Daniel Kulp
-Original Message- > From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:dk...@apache.org] > Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 9:21 AM > To: dev@maven.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.0-alpha-2 > > > -1 on a procedural basis. > > There needs to be a URL for JUST the artifacts going into th

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.0-alpha-2

2009-02-05 Thread Henri Gomez
> I'll do a sample project. Done >> If you pull a new update-dev build of m2e you'll notice that we have the >> problem reporting integrated now. With latest build you can go down to the >> "Maven" menu and at the bottom you'll see the "Report Issue..." option. You >> can put in the summary, desc

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.0-alpha-2

2009-02-05 Thread Henri Gomez
> I think your problem is specifically with ant so something that represents > what you tried to do in the project that failed would be handy. I'll do a sample project. > If you pull a new update-dev build of m2e you'll notice that we have the > problem reporting integrated now. With latest build

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.0-alpha-2

2009-02-05 Thread Jason van Zyl
I think your problem is specifically with ant so something that represents what you tried to do in the project that failed would be handy. If you pull a new update-dev build of m2e you'll notice that we have the problem reporting integrated now. With latest build you can go down to the "M

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.0-alpha-2

2009-02-05 Thread Henri Gomez
> Ant stuff doesn't work properly. Let's do the same thing, make a test > project and we'll work through it. Do you need a sample projet using ant task or something without ant ? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.ap

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.0-alpha-2

2009-02-05 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 5-Feb-09, at 6:21 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote: -1 on a procedural basis. That's the grouping for convenience but everything is separate under the covers. I see Brian gave you the separate. Don't worry nothing gets staged together in blobs, each deployment is actually separated. If I rele

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.0-alpha-2

2009-02-05 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 5-Feb-09, at 3:48 AM, Henri Gomez wrote: I checked it with on a simple project using jaxws wsgen and it works now (it was failing with 3.0-alpha1), good news. I tried on other projects where I got an maven ant involved to grab some system informations : Ant stuff doesn't work properly. L

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.0-alpha-2

2009-02-05 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 4-Feb-09, at 11:35 PM, Oleg Gusakov wrote: +1 This is awesome news - real repository manager at last !! When can we start using it? I'm going to stage a few 3.0 alphas, Brian is going to do the 2.0.x and I believe John is going to stage the 2.1.x releases there so lets work though

RE: [VOTE] Maven 3.0-alpha-2

2009-02-05 Thread Brian E. Fox
repos. -Original Message- From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:dk...@apache.org] Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 9:21 AM To: dev@maven.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.0-alpha-2 -1 on a procedural basis. There needs to be a URL for JUST the artifacts going into this release. Right now, I see 2.0.1

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.0-alpha-2

2009-02-05 Thread Daniel Kulp
-1 on a procedural basis. There needs to be a URL for JUST the artifacts going into this release. Right now, I see 2.0.10-RC8 stuff along with 3.0-alpha-2 stuff and enforcer stuff in the URL presented. I should have to sift through all the files in the URL to figure out which is stuff that

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.0-alpha-2

2009-02-05 Thread Henri Gomez
I checked it with on a simple project using jaxws wsgen and it works now (it was failing with 3.0-alpha1), good news. I tried on other projects where I got an maven ant involved to grab some system informations : org.apache.maven.plugins maven-antrun-plugin

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.0-alpha-2

2009-02-05 Thread PascalLeclercq
t; -- Jacques Ellul, The Technological Society > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org &g

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.0-alpha-2

2009-02-05 Thread Paul Benedict
+1 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.0-alpha-2

2009-02-04 Thread Oleg Gusakov
+1 This is awesome news - real repository manager at last !! When can we start using it? Jason van Zyl wrote: Hi, This release worked out better and the release profile is working now and everything is signed. This release is being staged with Nexus that we've installed in a new zone. So B

[VOTE] Maven 3.0-alpha-2

2009-02-04 Thread Jason van Zyl
Hi, This release worked out better and the release profile is working now and everything is signed. This release is being staged with Nexus that we've installed in a new zone. So Brian and I are guinea pigging the whole setup. We deployed with a self-signed SSL cert and we've asked for a