Good idea. We will also change the urls of the generated staged repos to
be more like maven-staging-[userid]-[short uniq number] to make them
less onerous.

-----Original Message-----
From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 3:58 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.0-alpha-2


I'll withdraw my -1 and put a +1

That said, in the future, make sure the appropriate URL is used in the
VOTE 
message.   The vote needs to be very clear exactly which artifacts (and
no 
others) are being voted on.   It might be best to separate it into
something 
like:

Staged artifacts being voted on:
https://repository.zones.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-staging-4
....

General staging repository for testing:
https://repository.zones.apache.org/content/groups/staging

Thanks!
Dan


On Thu February 5 2009 9:24:18 am Brian E. Fox wrote:
> This is the url jason meant to use:
>
https://repository.zones.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-staging-4
> 45ef7146ac750/
>
> The group url logically combines the artifacts into a single
repository
> in case you're trying to build against it, but they are separated into
> different repos.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 9:21 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.0-alpha-2
>
>
> -1 on a procedural basis.
>
> There needs to be a URL for JUST the artifacts going into this
release.
>
> Right now, I see 2.0.10-RC8 stuff along with 3.0-alpha-2 stuff and
> enforcer
> stuff in the URL presented.   I should have to sift through all the
> files in
> the URL to figure out which is stuff that is being voted on and which
> isn't.
> The URL presented in the vote needs to be JUST the artifacts being
voted
> on.
>
>
> Dan
>
> On Thu February 5 2009 1:34:18 am Jason van Zyl wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > This release worked out better and the release profile is working
now
> > and everything is signed. This release is being staged with Nexus
that
> > we've installed in a new zone. So Brian and I are guinea pigging the
> > whole setup. We deployed with a self-signed SSL cert and we've asked
> > for a proper one but this will do for now. We're making a plugin for
> > folks to make this dead simple to deployments with https. Anyway
we're
> > almost ready for do alpha-3 but here's alpha-2 in the meantime!
> >
> > Issues resolved:
>
>
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&&fixfor=1
> 443
>
> >0&pid=10500&sorter/field=issuekey&sorter/order=DESC
> >
> > Staging repo:
> > https://repository.zones.apache.org/content/groups/staging/
> >
> > Distributions:
>
>
https://repository.zones.apache.org/content/groups/staging/org/apache/ma
> ven
>
> >/apache-maven/3.0-alpha-2/
> >
> > Vote open for 72 hours.
> >
> > [ ] +1
> > [ ] +0
> > [ ] -1
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Jason
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------
> > Jason van Zyl
> > Founder,  Apache Maven
> > jason at sonatype dot com
> > ----------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > In short, man creates for himself a new religion of a rational
> > and technical order to justify his work and to be justified in it.
> >
> >   -- Jacques Ellul, The Technological Society
> >
> >
> >
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

-- 
Daniel Kulp
[email protected]
http://www.dankulp.com/blog

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to