+1 (NB)
Successfully built a 71 module internal app suite.
FYI It's pickiness found needs for two dep versions in a legacy module,
which is great find. The fail error message was not helpful ([ERROR]
Invalid Collect Request: null -> (snipped dep path)), but with -e the
nested exception thankfull
+1 (NB)
Successfully tested on a 68 module internal app suite.
On Wed, Mar 5, 2025 at 10:27 AM Mateusz Gajewski <
mateusz.gajew...@starburstdata.com> wrote:
> +1 (nb). Tested on Trino :)
>
> On Wed, Mar 5, 2025 at 3:33 PM Jermaine Hua wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Guillaume Nodet 于2025年3月5日 周三19:15写
+1 (NB)
Successfully tested on a 66 module internal app suite.
On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 3:47 AM Delany wrote:
> I opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-8434 but its just a
> collision with a property I had already set - so fixed it by renaming my
> property.
> The ticket can be close
+1 (NB)
Successfully tested on a 61 module internal app suite. Notables:
* AnsiConsole removal caused a docker-maven-plugin CNFE and thankfully it
has a recent release fixing that.
* Exposed a Spring GraphQL schema classpath file search configuration
issue, worked around by overriding the default
Additionally, since a module is part of a product and project is activity
to change a product, I prefer the term "module" (or even "submodule")
because they are not "projects" (yes Eclipse and other tools refer to them
as "projects" but that is arguably a wrong term). I also would rather
clarify t
I think reformatting files during every build is less desirable and adds
risk. I prefer the build to *enforce* the desired results, failing as
needed, and configuring the IDEs to auto-format the files on save. Both
Eclipse and IntelliJ have many configurable "save actions" for file format
and cle
M is for Milestone, an incremental release towards the eventual final
release considered early production ready but incomplete for full planned
features and implementation.
On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 2:10 PM Gary Gregory wrote:
> Can someone explain the M release meaning? Is it an alpha release? A
I've split git repos before and using filter-branch is the key to keep the
desired and purge the rest.
>From my notes, these two posts helped me:
*
https://docs.github.com/en/get-started/using-git/splitting-a-subfolder-out-into-a-new-repository
*
https://support.atlassian.com/bitbucket-cloud/docs/
In case this helps, Jason Dillon has a "Maven Shell" that does what you
seek for CLI - launches a Maven instance and runs interactive commands with
it, saving the startup time.
https://github.com/jdillon/mvnsh
On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 12:27 AM Jaroslav Tulach
wrote:
> > And it's Apache Maven, ov
The situation is that we
>> copy some sources to a newly created folder in runtime:
>> surefire-its/target//src/main/java/...
>>
>> Then this exceeds the length. The copy is done by Java process JDK 1.8.
>>
>> Cheers
>> Tibor
>>
>>
>>
>
Hi Tibor,
> I should maybe write some limitations regarding length of IT
class/method/package and length of Git branch name in README.md due to
problems with Windows paths length.
In case this helps: instead of shortening names for the Windows path length
limitation, we can configure Windows and
> The date of the commit is not the date it got committed to master, but the
date it got committed to some branch, no longer existing after the commit.
If this is the way GIT works, so be it. I just don't like it. It could not
be more confusing.
A couple of thoughts in case they help you.
1. Git
the plugin or
> upgrade/roll back Maven and we update our mapping layer for the 3.4.1
> release and move forward.
>
> Adding 1000 command line options is not the right answer.
>
> It seems we got lucky here with it only affecting plugins... so we can use
> our luck as
I find the prerequisites idea very intriguing. However, does that mean
it's automatic behavior and no way for user to control it?
(For user to control it, in addition to normal docs, I expect release notes
describing the issue (e.g. links to JIRA) and how to enable/disable the new
breaking feature
Thanks! It's running just fine. :-) It's very cool. Really nice
directory traversal and completion, colors, and commands/features I don't
know yet!
Very interesting timing diffs (for each casual test, I ran the command for
each multiple times to seed infra caches):
* on some asciidoc gen with
On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 3:59 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
> On March 8, 2016 at 7:45:53 AM, Jeff Jensen (
> jeffjen...@upstairstechnology.com) wrote:
>
> FYI Just cloned and tried build but Jansi 1.2 is not in Central: "Could not
>
> find artifact org.fusesource.jansi:j
ason, if you have a built version, do you mind adding it as a download to
the release files?
Do you have interest in supporting further or prefer not to continue with
it?
On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 10:40 PM, Jeff Jensen <
jeffjen...@upstairstechnology.com> wrote:
> Some months ago I was lookin
Some months ago I was looking for something like this. Due to this thread,
I will soon set it up and try it. (Thanks for sharing Tamás!)
On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 10:31 PM, Jason Dillon
wrote:
> On March 3, 2016 at 5:42:56 AM, Tamás Cservenák (ta...@cservenak.net)
> wrote:
> Maven Shell?
>
> htt
>
> Do those of you who are Eclipse users find m2e adequate?
I've successfully used m2e for many years on many different systems
(different customers). I suggest asking about any issues on the m2e users
list.
On Fri, Dec 25, 2015 at 2:37 PM, Gary Gregory
wrote:
> I'm still surprised that no
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 11:05 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY
wrote:
> Le lundi 22 septembre 2014 18:14:52 Kristian Rosenvold a écrit :
> >
> > com.google.code.findbugs
> > jsr305
> > 3.0.0
> > provided
> >
> >
> > The reason for this is that the findbugs project
+1
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 4:17 AM, Martin Gainty wrote:
> +1
>
> Martin
>
>
> > Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 09:16:19 +0100
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Add Manfred Moser as committer
> > From: stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com
> > To: dev@maven.apache.org
> >
> > +1
> >
> > On 13 May 2015 at 08:36, Kristia
I suggest alternative 2 as 1 doesn't scale well with new versions and 3 is
more confusing than 2.
On Sat, May 2, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Christopher wrote:
> Of the choices, alternative 1 seems the easiest for me.
>
> On Sat, May 2, 2015, 16:10 Dennis Lundberg wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm trying to v
And please add me as well.
id is jeffjensen
Thank you.
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Dan Tran wrote:
> Hi
>
> Please add me as well
>
> Thanks
>
> -D
>
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY
> wrote:
>
> > I added you to the last request for maven-developers group
> >
> > https://
I agree Fred... the reports are very helpful. I've always thought of it as
handling two needs: "reports" and "docs"; reports basically working OOTB
and docs as the team decides to hand-create.
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 10:43 PM, Fred Cooke wrote:
> Well, if you created it, then a personal thank
+1 asciidoctor
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 4:56 AM, Martijn Dashorst <
martijn.dasho...@gmail.com> wrote:
> While I use jekyll for lots of stuff (blogs and wicket website), I'd
> urge to use asciidoc[tor] as the markup format. Markdown is great, but
> rather limited for technical documentation. Ther
Sounds like an awesome improvement! Will we see speed improvement on war
file creation with many megs of jars in the lib dir or only with
compressing of files into the archive (ignoring the web files for this
question)?
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 7:43 AM, Kristian Rosenvold <
kristian.rosenv...@gma
While I agree with your assessment Paul, the problem with upgrading
non-sequential release numbers that I encounter with some of my customers
(the larger organizations or ones with regulated products [think medical])
is it usually causes some confusion ("we're on version n.2 and I see n.8
but nothi
>
> Integrating Failsafe in the same way as Surefire would be great for a lot
> of people I think.
I agree!
Personally, I wonder why we don't merge them.
I've wondered the same thing... is there a technical reason why it "won't"
or is difficult to make work?
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 11:54 AM
...and even though dbUnit has a base test class for extension, you can use
composition of it instead. Same for Spring Test - can configure it with
annotations and use a test runner. No base class needed in either case.
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Lennart Jörelid
wrote:
> Well ... trying t
Awesome! Thank you very much for the summary.
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 7:56 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> Here's a short summary of yesterdays discussion:
>
> ---
>
> Manfred Moser
>
> 1) Alternative verifier use in maven-android-plugin for testing. Igor
> created an alternative verifier for use in
Jason, for:
> 1) Include a "since" statement indicating at point the API was deprecated
You didn't mention if you are against doing so or not. Do you find it of
value for yourself and others?
> 2) include a statement pointing to the replacement API (or non-replacement
> and reason for same).
+1
In my circles, changing method params is a bad practice.
Enforcement of rules is key - I do the same thing Manfred, fail the build
on a set of FindBugs, PMD, and CheckStyle violations. Really makes coders
adhere!
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 10:15 PM, Manfred Moser wrote:
> I totally agree with
I just successfully viewed the page, so no problems reaching it.
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 7:30 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> For the last few days the instance seems to be in distress. Anyone else
> having issues?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jason
>
> --
party. The WAR module is not in the list of deps.
On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 10:49 AM, Stephen Connolly <
stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sunday, 13 April 2014, Jeff Jensen
> wrote:
>
> > Agreed, we put the WSDL and related schemas in a domain module and its
The app loads all resources from the classpath.
IIRC, Tomcat requires the exploded WAR. I think the Tomcat plugin also
requires file system files for config, e.g. ,
, and .
On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 10:19 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> On Apr 13, 2014, at 11:14 AM, Jeff Jensen <
>
Agreed, we put the WSDL and related schemas in a domain module and its
build generates these domain classes in its build. Then other modules use
the domain jar...
The only place we currently use dependency:unpack is in an AT (acceptance
test) module that retrieves the war and unpacks it to an exp
Looks good. I like the left nav better tho!
I don't think the Maven logo in the upper right corner looks bad/out of
place, however, a new logo is fun to have!
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 6:17 PM, Stephen Connolly <
stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> https://www.dropbox.com/s/w5eblhl4q0fzc
is switched on! :-)
Yes, very good!
>> -
>> Arnaud
>>
>> Le 27 juil. 2013 à 15:19, Jeff Jensen
>> a écrit :
>>
>> > That message indicates you need to git pull first. Even though you
>> > may already have done so and no one else has pu
That message indicates you need to git pull first. Even though you
may already have done so and no one else has pushed since, this usually
happens when modifying a commit that has been pushed/shared.
On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 8:08 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
> the last 2 commits are to be amended: ls
+1 (non-binding)
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 8:59 AM, Stephen Connolly
wrote:
> This vote is to cover the minimum required version of Java for Maven Core.
>
> Maven Plugins produced by the Apache Maven Project that are flagged as
> compatible with older versions of Maven Core as their baseline will s
It seems that most people care about X.Y and X.Y.Z numbers of the
versioning scheme, not X.Y.Z.N. To spin through version numbers without
concern during release candidates, perhaps using the 4th position, N, would
then allow continued use of the familiar X.Y and X.Y.Z references?
Major.Minor.Poin
g to result in all the children being part of the tag
> > though
> >
> > On Sunday, 24 March 2013, Jeff Jensen wrote:
> >
> >> -N
> >> Same for other operations to not recurse into children/modules.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at
Yes, good point to know of in case that causes a problem.
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 2:30 PM, Stephen Connolly <
stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote:
> That's still going to result in all the children being part of the tag
> though
>
> On Sunday, 24 March 2013, Jeff
-N
Same for other operations to not recurse into children/modules.
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Andrei Pozolotin <
andrei.pozolo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> *Robert*
>
> unrelated question, may be you can clarify: in the current
> maven-release-plugin
> what is the way to release
On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 6:51 AM, Stephen Connolly <
stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sunday, 9 December 2012, Kristian Rosenvold wrote:
>
> > 2012/12/9 Olivier Lamy >:
> > > Perso I'm fine using log4j2.
> > > I use the branch I pushed for some weeks now and I'm happy.
> > > Log4j2 has q
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 2:39 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Why do we have to force our users to a specific logging implementation
> than we choose ?
>
Doesn't the product have to establish a default? Isn't that the one
"forced" on the users?
Substitution of the default for alternate impleme
Milestones are great idea, and there has already been a few (just named the
same! :-).
+1 for 3.1.0
Nice infra improvements including SLF4J. Appreciating you patiently RM'ing
this Jason...
(and +1 for Logback; haven't used Log4j in 4 years).
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 7:59 AM, Jesse McConnell
wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 6:35 AM, Anders Hammar wrote:
>> Here's my suggestion:
>>
>> We keep the current state where we have the new logging API (slf4j) and the
>> System.out style implementation. Then we (Olivier?) create a JIRA ticket
>>
+1 (non-binding)
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 9:53 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Since last vote things have changed:
> * aether is in incubation process @eclipse
> * sisu is in incubation process @eclipse
>
> Due to the fact that those process can be long before having an
> official release f
We've been running the "beta" for (I don't know how many) months, and
works better than it ever has. I agree with Lukas; release it.
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 2:26 AM, Lukas Theussl wrote:
>
>
> Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
>>
>> the rationale behind not going directly to 3.0 was that site plugin is
>> ha
Is there a forthcoming explanation for a seemingly Maven PMC shakeup?
I find it odd that consistently excellent contributors such as Lukas,
Brian, et al are suddenly not on the Maven PMC. This is concerning as
these are people who have drastically improved and moved Maven
forward. It's very conce
With what JUnit version? I just tested is() and hasItems() and the
failure reporting message is 99% the same as assertEquals() with JUnit
4.8.2. They both display toString()s of the expected and actuals,
just prefixed with different names/words. What am I missing?
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 2:52
Works great again... thank you Lukas! :-)
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 2:04 PM, Lukas Theussl wrote:
>
> snapshots are deployed by now, let me know if it helps...
>
> -Lukas
>
>
> Jeff Jensen wrote:
>>
>> Thanks Lukas! Sorry - haven't had a moment to get sour
you have to build it
> yourself as I'm getting a 500 when trying to deploy to apache right now, so
> no snaps are deployed yet.
>
> HTH,
> -Lukas
>
>
> Jeff Jensen wrote:
>>
>> Yes, :-) 3.0-beta-4-SNAPSHOT. The fixes over the past months have
>> been v
ve broken site generation as
> it only concerns the DeployMojo. However, I see that it could break
> site:stage-deploy, is this what you are seeing?
>
> I don't exclude that I broke something somewhere else, but I need more info
> to track it down, a stack trace or better a test pro
Hi Lukas!
I have a question on this commit, as it causes our site gen to now fail.
With the following change:
> +if ( site == null )
> +{
> +throw new MojoExecutionException(
> +"Missing site information in the distribution management of
> the project
+1 (non-binding)
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 2:40 AM, Lukas Theussl wrote:
>
> +1
>
> -Lukas
>
>
> Kristian Rosenvold wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> We solved 10 issues:
>>
>> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10541&version=17014
>>
>> There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA
+1 (non-binding)
This one works great too!
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 5:38 AM, chemit wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 11:46:40 +0100
> Kristian Rosenvold wrote:
>
> +1 (non binding)
>
>
>
> --
> Tony Chemit
>
> tél: +33 (0) 2 40 50 29 28
> email: che...@codelutin.com
> http://ww
f console output;
>
> It turned out for test number N, any stdout/stderr output would be
> duplicated into N tee-streams, and they were'nt going away.
> That's a lot of memory going nowhere.
>
> Kristian
>
> on., 15.12.2010 kl. 08.g08 -0600, skrev Jeff Jensen:
>>
+1 (non-binding)
We can finally run a full build with tests from the parent with this
version (would OOM unless -Xmx was set to nearly 2G!). :-)
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 2:01 AM, chemit wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Dec 2010 00:21:49 +0100
> Kristian Rosenvold wrote:
>
> +1 (none binding)
>
> Works fine
+1 (non-binding)
"better, stronger, faster" :-)
-Original Message-
From: Benjamin Bentmann [mailto:benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu]
Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 8:09 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-3 (take 2)
Hi,
what's a better start for a week th
+1
It's clear, it allows me to continue if I want to try it anyway, and I think
there was plenty of prior discussion of it on the list.
-Original Message-
From: Kristian Rosenvold [mailto:kristian.rosenv...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 2:57 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject
+1
-Original Message-
From: Hervé BOUTEMY [mailto:herve.bout...@free.fr]
Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2010 9:35 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: [VOTE] Release Maven PMD plugin version 2.5
Hi,
We solved 24 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11140&styleNa
+1
-Original Message-
From: Olivier Lamy [mailto:ol...@apache.org]
Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 3:47 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Commit access for Kristian Rosenvold
+1
--
Olivier
2010/1/4 Jason van Zyl :
> Hi,
>
> I have reviewed the patches for the parallel bui
+1
-Original Message-
From: aherit...@gmail.com [mailto:aherit...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Arnaud
HERITIER
Sent: Sunday, September 06, 2009 6:25 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Cc: Stephen Connolly
Subject: [vote] Invite Stephen Connolly to join Maven committers
Hi all,
I'd like to propose
+1
-Original Message-
From: Arnaud HERITIER [mailto:aherit...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, September 04, 2009 8:20 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: What's block maven-toolchains-plugin getting *any* release at
all?
+1 to propose you to join us as committer :-)
Arnaud
On Fri, Sep 4,
Perhaps setup CI (Hudson/CruiseControl/Continuum) locally and manually invoke
builds when desired. Using build dependencies, you can have subsequent builds
kick off from you manually invoking the first. Then manually commit or
automate?
-Original Message-
From: Oleg Gusakov [mailto:[
I like your analogy Brian.
Additionally, I think the Sonatype Maven book has a nice comparison:
http://www.sonatype.com/book/reference/introduction.html#sect-compare-ant-maven
(and I think this is a User-list question, not a Developer-list one?)
-Original Message-
From: Brian E. Fox [ma
Possibly there are some to close (won't fix/won't do the enhancement), but
what is the reasoning for a bulk close of all of them?
If consolidating all to one JIRA is of some benefit, then why not just bulk
move those not closed to the "new one" (after processing them per the
above)?
And consolida
Ugh!! :-(
Thanks for the help Arnaud, Xavier, and Lukas...
> -Original Message-
> From: Arnaud HERITIER [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, December 01, 2007 4:33 PM
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: Re: [m1] PMD plugin dependencies
>
> Hi Xavier,
>
> Thanks a lot for y
7;s why we tried for the 1.1 release of maven to align
dependencies
> > to
> > > have less side effects.
> > > I hope that 1.1.1 is compatible with 1.1-beta-9. Depending of the
part
> > of
> > > jaxen which is used by pmd it's possible that it works fine
7;s why we tried for the 1.1 release of maven to align
dependencies
> > to
> > > have less side effects.
> > > I hope that 1.1.1 is compatible with 1.1-beta-9. Depending of the
part
> > of
> > > jaxen which is used by pmd it's possible that it works fine
Hi Arnaud,
PMD 4.1 has updated its deps (e.g. asm and jaxen), and I am concerned on
upgrading the plugin. I know you (and possibly others) spent considerable
time aligning the dependencies amongst core and many other plugins. I know
Jaxen was one of them.
Do you have concerns/suggestions on upda
+1
Great work on the JS plugin too!
> -Original Message-
> From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2007 3:08 AM
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: [vote] Nicolas de Loof as a committer
>
> I'd like to call a vote for Nicolas de Loof as a committer
I think this might be the most practical solution.
Yes, perhaps the functionality belongs with some type of pom/release/build/CM
topic'd plugin, but that is a secondary issue!
Tools like the archetypes can create them/have them created in the pom too,
e.g. if "genAllDeps=true".
> -Original
An emphatic +1 :-)
-Original Message-
From: Arnaud HERITIER [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2007 12:46 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: [vote] Release Maven 1.1 Final
Hi team,
It's with pleasure that I want to launch the vote to release the final
version of m
+1
-Original Message-
From: Dennis Lundberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2007 10:27 AM
To: dev@maven.apache.org
Subject: [proposal] Change project names for M1 plugins in JIRA
Hi
We get some JIRA issues for the M1 plugins that really belongs to the M2
plugins. To
+1
-Original Message-
From: Lukas Theussl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2007 8:20 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: [vote] Release maven 1.1 RC1
+1
-Lukas
Arnaud HERITIER wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> The time has come to release maven 1.1 RC1.
>
> Since the
+1 for all
-Original Message-
From: Arnaud HERITIER [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2007 4:41 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: [vote] [m1] couple of plugins for rc1
+1 for all
Arnaud
On 02/05/07, Stephane Nicoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> Stéphane
>
+1
-Original Message-
From: Arnaud HERITIER [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 10:49 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: [M1][vote] release plugins : idea 1.7, jalopy 1.5.1, jar 1.8.1,
javadoc 1.9, multichanges 1.3, plugin 1.7.1
Here is a new list of plugins to rele
Agreed. Putting the "release management" hat on, "betas", "RCs", etc. are
not much of a beta/RC when they keep adding new functionalitythey are
continued development releases. :-)
-Original Message-
From: Arnaud HERITIER [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 5:43 A
+1
Generated docs look good.
> -Original Message-
> From: Arnaud HERITIER [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, April 20, 2007 5:49 PM
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: [vote] maven-model 3.0.2 for maven 1.1
>
> Hi team,
>
> We finalized the new version of maven-model 3.0.2 f
> -Original Message-
> From: Arnaud HERITIER [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2007 7:23 PM
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: Re: [m1] review of plugins to release
>
> On 22/04/07, Jeff Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
>
> Thus I have some doubts about some others plugins which have changes
> already applied [3] that could justify a new release :
I'm open to including none/some/all. If your concern is delaying the 1.1
release further, I understand the option to include "none". Are there any
that are "ready" and
d
On 17/04/07, Jeff Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > someone have an idea...
>
> I wonder what would happen if we used PathFinder to run Maven/the build;
> perhaps it would find the issue?
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Arnaud HERITIER [mailto:[
+1
-Original Message-
From: Arnaud HERITIER [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2007 6:32 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: [vote] Release maven-site-plugin 1.7.2 for maven 1.X
Hi,
I encountered some problems with the site plugin and its rsync deployment
feature.
I
+1
-Original Message-
From: Arnaud HERITIER [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2007 7:42 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: [vote] Release maven-announcement-plugin 1.4.1 for maven 1.X
On 16/04/07, Arnaud HERITIER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> In the logi
+1
-Original Message-
From: Arnaud HERITIER [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2007 7:41 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: [vote] Release maven-developer-activity-plugin and
maven-file-activity-plugin 1.6.1 for maven 1.X
Hi,
Those two plugins have a similar fix and
> someone have an idea...
I wonder what would happen if we used PathFinder to run Maven/the build;
perhaps it would find the issue?
-Original Message-
From: Arnaud HERITIER [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2007 8:10 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: ConcurrentModif
That sounds like a great idea...and one less place to visit.
-Original Message-
From: Brian E. Fox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2007 3:23 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: RE: Creating a schedule for releases
I know the calendar is already out there so this mig
;t propose moving the whole site to it, I think it makes sense as
an integrated subsite.
Take a look at these examples:
http://incubator.apache.org/openejb/
http://incubator.apache.org/openjpa/
http://geronimo.apache.org/
- Brett
On 30/03/2007, at 10:27 AM, Jeff Jensen wrote:
> I wish it was all
I wish it was all in one place - Maven site.
Too many don't know or don't go. If it must reside elsewhere, the link to
external site docs must be very prominent.
-Original Message-
From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2007 4:26 PM
To: Maven Developers
The M2 FAQ has a ref to ibiblio. Does this need to change to the "new"
Maven Central ref?
http://maven.apache.org/general.html#available-plugins
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMA
has ibiblio ref
tha info is not even applicable anymore
On 3/24/07, Jeff Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The M2 FAQ has a ref to ibiblio. Does this need to change to the "new"
> Maven Central ref?
>
> http://maven.apache.org/ge
The M2 FAQ has a ref to ibiblio. Does this need to change to the "new"
Maven Central ref?
http://maven.apache.org/general.html#available-plugins
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMA
+1 for all but clover (never used it!).
-Original Message-
From: Lukas Theussl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2007 7:38 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: [vote] [m1] plugin releases
Hi,
These are the plugins that do not need the updated maven-model, so I'd lik
I think it is clear now - Ralph, you jumped into a thread about the Maven 2
Cobertura plugin, and began asking about the Maven 1 plugin. This confused
subsequent replies!
If you have Cobertura questions or issues, please start a new thread as
Lukas suggested.
-Original Message-
From: Ra
For a quick "opinion ASAP", I did a quick review of the pages, and they look
pretty good. When I can review more in-depth, I may suggest some additional
info/clarifications and writing changes on the site docs.
My initial suggestion on the Overview page is that I would like a link to an
example/r
Good Idea (tm) Jason. I'm glad you are making a "production release
environment".
-Original Message-
From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 8:42 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: calling vote for 2.0.5
On 11 Jan 07, at 8:56 AM 11 Jan 07,
maven-1/plugins/trunk/pmd/project.xml
On 1/2/07, Jeff Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Asm 3.0 is not on Ibiblio yet, which I knew, but Lukas told me that
> committing these changes already would break the bootstrap, and asked
> me to revert them.
Ok, he's right.
1 - 100 of 190 matches
Mail list logo
