Yes, that is the one.

I have not used it.  I have followed it for the past couple of years, and
find it very intriguing.  Others have had success with it, and wonder if it
would help find the problem you are seeing.  I wish I had some time for it,
I think it would be fun to do that.


I also wonder about some of the static checker results.  Tools like FindBugs
and Lint4J have a few checks for thread issues.  Has anyone ever run them on
the code base?  PMD and Checkstyle don't really have those kinds of checks
like the aforementioned do.


-----Original Message-----
From: Arnaud HERITIER [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2007 3:38 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: ConcurrentModificationException in maven 1.x - any ideas ?

You are talking about this one : http://javapathfinder.sourceforge.net/ ?
I never used it. Did you ?
You think it is possible ?

Arnaud

On 17/04/07, Jeff Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > someone have an idea...
>
> I wonder what would happen if we used PathFinder to run Maven/the build;
> perhaps it would find the issue?
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Arnaud HERITIER [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2007 8:10 PM
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: ConcurrentModificationException in maven 1.x - any ideas ?
>
> Hi guys,
>
>   We have regularly a ConcurrentModificationException (MAVEN-1840) when we
> build maven 1.X with continuum.
>
>
http://maven.zones.apache.org:8180/continuum/servlet/continuum/target/Projec
> tBuild.vm?view=ProjectBuild&buildId=247&id=6
>
>   I tried to fix it but without success. The problem is that I can't
> reproduce it locally. I someone have an idea...
>
> cheers
>
> Arnaud
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to